Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:09]

THIS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING THIS BEAUTIFUL DECEMBER 3RD, 2025. MADAM CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL COUNCIL MEMBER BARTON HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER CRISMAN HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER CRAMER HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER. PENMAN HERE. COUNCIL MEMBER. PETROFF HERE. VICE MAYOR.

[2) INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE]

HUTCHINSON HERE. MAYOR HEITMANN HERE. THANK YOU. TODAY WE ARE JOINED BY REVEREND ROBERT MULLIGAN FROM SAINT ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH. IF YOU'LL COME FORWARD AND STAND FOR THE INVOCATION FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. LET US REMEMBER THAT WE ARE IN GOD'S PRESENCE, LOVING GOD, WE DO GOOD WORK, IMPORTANT WORK. INSTILL IN US A SPIRIT OF GRATITUDE FOR COMMUNITY, FOR THE CITY OF NAPLES, FOR ALL THE GOOD WE DO TOGETHER. INSTILL IN US A SPIRIT OF SERVICE. HELP US TO SEE YOU, LORD GOD, WITHIN ALL OF OUR CITIZENS AND VISITORS. INSTILL. INSTILL IN US TO A DRIVE TO PASSIONATELY PURSUE OUR MISSION, THE WELFARE OF OUR CITY AND THE COMMON GOOD. IN THIS SEASON OF HOPE AND GRATITUDE, THERE IS MUCH TO CELEBRATE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COUNSEL, YOUR WISDOM, ALL THAT YOU PROVIDED FOR US OVER THESE MANY YEARS. WE OFFER YOU THANKS FOR MANY LEADERS IN AND OUTSIDE OF THIS ROOM WHO HAVE BUILT OUR CITY AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO IN THE FUTURE. WE HONOR THEIR BOUNDLESS GENEROSITY, THEIR BOLDNESS, THEIR SMARTS, THEIR PERSEVERANCE. FILL US ALL WITH FAITH, HOPE, AND LOVE. WE FACE THE CHALLENGES THAT LIE AHEAD AND AS WE PURSUE NEW OPPORTUNITIES. LOVING GOD HELP US TO BE. WE UNITE US, INSPIRE US, SUSTAIN US, HELP US TOGETHER TO SEE YOU AND SEEK YOU IN ALL THAT WE DO. AND FOR THIS WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. THAT'S THE BEST PART OF THE MEETING RIGHT THERE. THANK YOU SIR. THIS IS PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. FOR ALL. WE'RE AT ITEM FOUR, ANNOUNCEMENTS AND

[4.A) Collier Community Foundation 40th Anniversary Proclamation.]

PRESENTATIONS. AND IT'S MY HONOR TO WELCOME EILEEN CONNELLY, CHRYSLER TO THE PODIUM. MADAM, WHY DON'T WE SET THE AGENDA, MADAM? I'M SORRY. IT'S OKAY. OKAY. SORRY, I GOT THROWN. NO, NO. THAT'S OKAY. I GOT THROWN OVER. GOOD MORNING. WELCOME BACK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO. THANK YOU. THIS PROCLAMATION IS. WHEREAS FOR FOUR DECADES, THE COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION HAS ADVANCED THE CIVIC, CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND CHARITABLE INTERESTS OF COLLIER COUNTY BY PARTNERING WITH DONORS, NON-PROFITS AND STAKEHOLDERS TO INSPIRE IDEAS, IGNITE ACTION, AND MOBILIZE RESOURCES FOR THE COMMUNITY BETTERMENT. AND WHEREAS, CCF HAS ADDRESSED VITAL COMMUNITY PRIORITIES SUCH AS HOUSING, HUNGER, MENTAL HEALTH, SUBSTANCE ABUSE, ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT CRISIS AND DISASTER RELIEF, AND PROGRAMS FOR SENIORS AND VETERANS. WHEREAS SERVING AS A PHILANTHROPIC HUB FOR CCF, MANAGES ENDOWED FUNDS, AWARDS GRANTS, CONVENES PARTNERSHIPS, AND ACTS AS A CATALYST FOR MEANINGFUL CHANGE ACROSS COLLIER COUNTY. WHEREAS THROUGH COLLIER COUNTY TOGETHER RELIEF FUND AND ITS PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY UNIT, CCF PROVIDED CRITICAL DISASTER RELIEF FOLLOWING THE HURRICANE IAN, COORDINATING RECOVERY EFFORTS AND DISTRIBUTING EMERGENCY AID TO 72 HOUSEHOLDS IN SUPPORTING CLEANUP DEBRIS, MEALS, AND HOME REPAIRS IN EAST RIVER PARK EAST, WHILE ALSO SPEARHEADING LONG RESILIENCY PROJECTS THAT WOULD ELEVATE AND REPLACE FLOOD PRONE HOMES, INCLUDING A HISTORIC 63 YEAR OLD RESIDENTS BEING RAISED NEARLY FIVE FEET UNDER A STATE GRANT. WHEREAS IN THE MILESTONE YEAR, CCF CELEBRATES THE LEGACY OF GENEROSITY AND THE INNOVATION OF AWARDING SURPRISE COMMUNITY GRANTS AND LAUNCHING THE INAUGURAL AWARD IN RECOGNITION OF TRANSFORMATIVE GIVING. AND WHEREAS, THE CITY OF NAPLES PROUDLY JOINS RESIDENTS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY IN HONORING THE PARTNERSHIPS, THE DONORS, THE NONPROFITS, AND THE SPIRIT OF

[00:05:02]

COLLABORATION THAT HAS DEFINED THE COLLIER COUNTY FOUNDATION I. I NOW, THEREFORE I TERESA HEITMAN, MAYOR FOR THE CITY OF NAPLES, DO HEREBY RECOGNIZE AND HONOR THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AND EXTEND A HEARTFELT APPRECIATION FOR FOUR DECADES OF TRANSFORMATIVE SERVICE, STEWARDSHIP, AND COMPASSION THAT CONTINUE TO MAKE OUR COMMUNITY STRONGER AND MORE RESILIENT. AND I THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU DO. AND IF YOU'D LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS, YEAH. THANK YOU. WE ARE HONORED TO RECEIVE THIS PROCLAMATION TODAY. WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO HAVE OUR 40TH ANNIVERSARY. AND BY JUST SOME BIZARRE COINCIDENCE, WE HIT 400 MILLION THAT WE'VE DONE OUT IN GRANT MAKING SINCE WE STARTED 40 YEARS AGO. SO IT JUST HAPPENED TO FALL ON THIS ANNIVERSARY. SO WE'RE VERY EXCITED. AND I HOPE IF YOU ALL HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO GO BY MRS. DEAN'S HOUSE AND SEE HOW BEAUTIFUL IT LOOKS AND WHAT CAN HAPPEN TO RIVER PARK. SO THANK YOU AND LOOKING FORWARD TO CONTINUED PARTNERSHIPS.

THANK YOU. THANKS. CAN YOU COME FORWARD AND GET A PICTURE? OKAY. THANKS FOR COMING EARLY.

[3) SET AGENDA (add or remove items)]

OKAY. SORRY I LOVE THAT PRESENTATION FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY FOUNDATION, BUT I WAS SO EXCITED I SKIPPED SETTING THE AGENDA. SO MR. YOUNG, ITEM THREE SETTING THE AGENDA. NO CHANGES MA'AM. OKAY, COUNCIL. MADAM MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MOVE APPROVAL AND SETTING THE AGENDA. OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION BY VICE MAYOR AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PETRANOFF. ALL IN FAVOR? SIGNED BY I. I OPPOSED, THANK YOU. COUNCIL PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[4.B) Recognition of Volunteer Board Members for Their Years of Service to the City of Naples.  ]

NOW THAT TAKES US TO ITEM FOUR B MRS. RAMBO'S. GOOD MORNING, MAYOR, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. AND I'D LIKE TO ALSO INVITE THE MAYOR DOWN TO PRESENT THE AWARD TO AND INVITE MR. KOMARNICKI.

MARK KOMARNICKI. TODAY IS A VERY SPECIAL DAY. WE'RE HERE TO RECOGNIZE TWO OF YOUR BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS THAT HAVE SERVED LONG TERM SERVICE. THE FIRST IS JOHN CROSS, AND HE COULDN'T BE WITH US TODAY. I HOPE HE CAN COME COME BACK. BUT JUST SO YOU KNOW, HE SERVED TWO FULL TERMS ON THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD. HE SERVED AS VICE CHAIR AND CHAIR, AND HE WAS VERY DEDICATED TO PLANNING ACTIVITIES AND VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR THE CITY. AND ALSO WE HAVE MARK KOMARNICKI WITH THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADVISORY BOARD, AND WE WANT TO RECOGNIZE MR. KOMARNICKI FOR HIS DEDICATED SERVICE FROM 2022 TO 2025. HIS LEADERSHIP WAS QUICKLY EVIDENT. HE WAS ELECTED VICE CHAIR IN 2023 AND SERVED AS CHAIR. BEGINNING IN JANUARY OF 2024, UNTIL HE RESIGNED TO MOVE CLOSER TO HIS NEW GRAND CHILD, SON RIGHT SON, SO HE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO MAKE ALL THOSE MEETINGS. BUT HE ALSO SERVED OTHER AREAS OF THE COMMUNITY ON THE MPO, THE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE. SO HE HAD A LOT OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUR COMMUNITY, AND WE SINCERELY THANK HIM FOR OUR SERVICE AND THE SERVICE TO THE CITY OF NAPLES. AND THE MAYOR WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. VERY NICE. THANK YOU. WELL, I'LL BE VERY BRIEF. WELL, IT WAS AN HONOR TO SERVE ON THE CRAB AND AND TO WORK WITH ALL OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MADAM MAYOR, AND ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT SINCE IT WAS PART OF WHERE WE LIVE IN NAPLES SQUARE. SO I APPRECIATE THE TIME THAT I WAS ABLE TO SERVE ON THE CITY BOARDS. AND HOPEFULLY, MAYBE IF THINGS CHANGE, I COULD RETURN. BUT, YOU KNOW, FAMILY CALLED.

SO IT WAS AN IMPORTANT MOVE FOR US, AT LEAST FOR PART OF THE YEAR, TO SPEND SOME TIME NEAR OUR NEW GRANDSON. SO THANK YOU AND THANK YOU FOR THE AWARD.

[00:10:26]

YEAH. YEAH. FIVE FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK IN PUBLIC COMMENT, YOU

[5) PUBLIC COMMENTS]

CAN FILL OUT THE REGISTRATION FORMS THAT ARE IN THE BACK AND GIVE THEM TO THE CLERK. OUR FIRST PUBLIC SPEAKER IS MARTIN KURTZ. OH, THAT'S FOR ITEM 13. I'M SORRY, I HAVE RICHARD SCHROEDER. GOOD MORNING SIR. I'D JUST LIKE TO DISCUSS I KNOW THAT THE COUNCIL IS GOING TO BE CONSIDERING VARIOUS ISSUES AROUND THE PRIDE FEST LAWSUIT OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF MEETINGS OR OVER THE NEXT MONTH. SO I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT I WAS PRESENT AT THE US FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN IN FORT MYERS IN MAY TO LISTEN TO THE ARGUMENTS OF PRIDE FEST VERSUS THE CITY OF NAPLES. THE JUDGE, OF COURSE, DID WHAT JUDGES OFTEN DO, WHICH IS TO ACCEPT THE ARGUMENTS FROM THE SIDE WHOSE CORE PRINCIPLES HE OR SHE WAS INCLINED TOWARDS ANYWAY. SO I AGREE WITH THOSE HERE WHO ASK THAT THIS CASE NOT BE SETTLED AT THIS POINT. THE ROOT CAUSES THAT LED UP TO THIS SUIT, INCLUDING THE FACT THAT A LARGE AND BROAD SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION REGARD THIS EVENT AS AN AFFRONT TO COMMON DECENCY, ESPECIALLY WITH REGARD TO THE OFTEN UNSUBTLE INDOCTRINATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN, WILL NOT BE GIVEN A FAIR HEARING IF THIS RULING IS LEFT AS IS. SO PLEASE STICK TO YOUR GUNS. DON'T SETTLE. WE'RE WITH YOU ON THIS.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS JOHN MANES. MAYO. MANES. AND. ALL RIGHT. HEARING ISN'T AS BAD AS I THOUGHT IT WAS. MY NAME IS JOHN MANES. I'VE BEEN A COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENT FOR 36 YEARS. FOR 21 OF THOSE 36 YEARS I WAS IN NAPLES. POLICE OFFICER WORKED EVERY DAY IN THE CITY. FOR THE LAST 15. I'VE BEEN A REALTOR WORKING MANY DAYS IN THE CITY, SO I LOVE THIS CITY. I LOVE THE COUNCIL, I LOVE WORKING AT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND TO ECHO A LITTLE BIT WHAT DOCTOR SCHROEDER SAID. YEAH, STICK TO YOUR GUNS. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, THE BIBLE SAYS LUKE CHAPTER 17, VERSE TWO, BETTER TO HAVE A MILLSTONE TIED AROUND YOUR NECK AND BE CAST INTO THE SEA THAN TO CAUSE A LITTLE ONE TO STUMBLE. AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING. AND YOU'VE GOT A LOT OF SUPPORT OUT THERE. IF PEOPLE DON'T TAKE THE TIME TO COME IN AND SHOW IT. BUT WE'RE HERE, AND I JUST LIKE TO SHARE ONE LITTLE EXAMPLE WHERE I THINK YOU'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING. IF YOU REMEMBER, A FEW YEARS AGO, THERE WAS A FOOTBALL PLAYER BY THE NAME OF COLIN KAEPERNICK WHO TOOK A KNEE FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO 40 NINERS AND THE NFL OWNERS WERE TOO WEAK TO PUT A STOP TO IT. THEY COULD HAVE NIPPED IN THE BUD RIGHT THEN AND JUST SAID, LISTEN, YOU CAN. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTEST HOWEVER YOU LIKE, BUT NOT ON OUR NOT ON OUR DIME. YOU WERE PAYING YOU TO PLAY, NOT TO PROTEST. DO IT SOMEWHERE ELSE.

THEY DIDN'T DO THAT. AS A RESULT, IT COST THEM BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN REVENUE, LOST VIEWERSHIP AND THAT SORT OF THING. IF WE DON'T TAKE A STAND. AND AGAIN, I APPLAUD YOU GUYS FOR DOING A GREAT JOB. IF WE IF WE SETTLE THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE OTHER PEOPLE COMING WITH EVENTS LIKE THIS THAT ULTIMATELY CAUSE PEOPLE TO STOP VISITING DOWNTOWN, PATRONIZING THE BUSINESSES, AND THAT COULD COST THE TAXPAYER, YOUR BUSINESS OWNERS MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN REVENUE. I MEAN, THAT'S GOING TO COME DOWN THE LINE, BUT I THERE'S NO SENSE TAKING A CHANCE. YOU'RE EITHER GOING TO HAVE TO PAY SOME MONEY UP FRONT TO FIGHT THIS OR POTENTIALLY PAY A LOT OF MONEY DOWN THE LINE. AND I'M PRETTY SURE THE BUSINESS OWNERS ARE SUPPORTING YOU AS WELL. SO THAT'S MY $0.02. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.

THANK YOU CITY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR LOYALTY TO NAPLES. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS KARDAN TAMARA.

NO. OKAY. DONNA. AIDEN. AIDEN. SORRY. MORNING. MORNING. MY NAME IS DONNA. AIDEN. AND I'M A

[00:15:03]

ZIP CODE 34102. RULES ARE FOR THE NOT FOR NAPLES PRIDE. THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT NAPLES PRIDE IS SAYING TO CITY COUNCIL, CITY STAFFING, POLICE, FIRE DEPARTMENT AND NAPLES CITY RESIDENTS ON PAGE FOUR OF THE NAPLES CITY SPECIAL PERMITS MANUAL UNDER CITY STAFFING AND SERVICE FEE. IT CLEARLY STATES THE COST OF ALL CITY SERVICES PROVIDED FOR THE EVENT WILL BE PAID FOR BY THE ORGANIZING AGENCY. A CITY SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THE ESTIMATED COST WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE APPLICANT TO SIGN AND RETURN TO THE EVENT. RETURN PRIOR TO THE EVENT. PAYMENT IS DUE WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF INVOICE. NOTE NAPLES PRIDE WILLINGLY SIGNED THIS CONTRACT ON PAGE NINE OF THE MANUAL. UNDER CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY, THE CITY MANAGER MAY GRANT OR DENY A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT CONSIDERING WHETHER NO OUTSTANDING BALANCES ARE DUE TO THE CITY FOR ASSISTANCE FROM PREVIOUS ACTIVITIES FROM THE APPLICANT, AND THE EVENT IS GENERALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE CITY AND OR THE LOCAL PERMITS. HOSTING AN EVENT IN CAMBRIA PARK IN THE CITY OF NAPLES IS A PRIVILEGE, NOT A RIGHT. SO I ASK THE CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. WHAT PRECEDENTS DOES NAPLES PRIDE SET? ARE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS NOW GOING TO THINK THAT THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY EVENT SECURITY FEES? WHY DOES NAPLES PRIDE THINK THEY ARE EXEMPT FROM FOLLOWING RULES? SINCE NAPLES PRIDE LIKES TO TOUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT AS A REASON WHY THEIR EVENTS ARE DISTASTEFUL, OBSCENE AND LEWD, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE A QUOTE FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON. ARBITRARY POWER IS MOST EASILY ESTABLISHED ON THE RUINS OF LIBERTY, ABUSED TO LICENTIOUSNESS. THROUGH THIS QUOTE, WASHINGTON WARNS US THAT WHEN A SOCIETY BECOMES LICENTIOUS OR EXCESSIVELY PERMISSIVE, IT PAVES THE WAY FOR THE EROSION OF INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS AND EVENTUALLY LEADS TO THE DOWNFALL OF A SOCIETY. FOR EXAMPLE, LET US IMAGINE A SOCIETY WHERE THE BOUNDARIES OF LIBERTY HAVE BEEN ENTIRELY DISSOLVED, LEADING TO A STATE OF LICENTIOUSNESS, LIKE A NAPLES PRIDE EVENT WHERE MEN ARE DRESSED LIKE WOMEN, DANCING HALF NAKED, LAYING ON THE GROUND IN CAMBRIA PARK WITH THEIR LEGS SPREAD OPEN AND ACCEPTING MONEY FROM CHILDREN, OTHERS DRESSED IN SATANIC COSTUMES, AND WOMEN WALKING AROUND WITH THEIR SHIRTS OPEN, SHOWING THEIR MUTILATED BREASTS. SADLY, WE DON'T NEED TO IMAGINE THIS SCENARIO BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT HAS BEEN GOING ON IN CAMBRIA PARK DURING NAPLES PRIDE FEST. WE HAVE PICTURES AND VIDEOS TO PROVE IT. JUST LIKE GEORGE WASHINGTON'S WORDS REMIND US OF THE NEED FOR A WELL BALANCED SOCIETY, THE CITY OF NAPLES VISION DOCUMENT REMINDS US OF THE IMPORTANCE OF A WELL BALANCED SOCIETY. IT STATES THE ENDURING CHARACTER OF NAPLES REFLECTS OUR COMMITMENT TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND PRESERVE OUR SMALL TOWN FEEL AND CHARM. WE WILL MANAGE CONFLICTING INTERESTS OF TOURISTS AND RESIDENTS BY PROMOTING PEACE AND COMFORT OF RESIDENTS. SO NAPLES PRIDE REFLECT THE SMALL TOWN FEEL, CHARM OR CHARACTER OF THE CITY. DOES IT PRIORITIZE THE PEACE AND COMFORT OF RESIDENTS? NO. IT PROMOTES WHAT WASHINGTON WARNED US ABOUT LICENTIOUSNESS AND THE DOWNFALL OF SOCIETY. LASTLY, I ASK THE CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL TO STAND FIRM TO DECLINE NAPLES PRIDE APPLICATIONS GOING FORWARD AND PROTECT NOT ONLY THE PEACE AND COMFORT OF NAPLES RESIDENTS, BUT CHILDREN. NOW MORE THAN EVER, WE NEED NOT ONLY WISE LEADERS, BUT GOD FEARING LEADERS WITH THE COURAGE TO DO THE RIGHT THING. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. AND JUST FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE, PLEASE, WE REFRAIN FROM ANY BOOING, CLAPPING OR DISCUSSION OR COMMENTS DURING PUBLIC COMMENT AND GIVE RESPECT TO THOSE SPEAKING. SO THANK YOU. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS EL NINO. GOOD MORNING SIR. IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, MY GIVEN NAME BY A FRIEND IS EL NINO, LITTLE BROTHER. AND I'VE BEEN A RESIDENT HERE FOR A LONG TIME. YOU SHOULD RESIGN IN DISGRACE FOR WHAT YOU DID TO LAW ENFORCEMENT FAMILIES, FOLLOWING THEM HOME TO THEIR PERSONAL RESIDENCE IS OUTRAGEOUS BEHAVIOR UNBECOMING A MAYOR. RESIGN WHEN YOU CAN. YOU. I DON'T NEED TO SAY MORE MISMANAGEMENT BY CITY MANAGER. YOU SHOULD RESIGN IMMEDIATELY. MISMANAGED. I CAN FIX YOUR PROBLEMS INSTANTLY WITH LITTLE MONEY. PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING AND RESIGN. DAMN. I'M SORRY. I CAN FIX YOUR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PROBLEM INSTANTLY WITH THE LITTLE LABOR I CAN SUPPLY FOR FREE. YOUR POTHOLES. SINKHOLES FOR THE SEWER SYSTEM IS A BIG PROBLEM.

LIABILITY. THE SINKHOLES ARE RIGHT ON THE MAIN SEWER LINE. COMING. I RODE MY BIKE THIS MORNING AND I CAN SHOW YOU WHERE THEY ARE. I'M LOCAL, EXTREME LOCAL. I KNOW THE CITY BY HEART. BY WALKING IT AND LIVING IT FOR A LONG TIME. THE MAYOR HAS TO GO AND THE MANAGER HAS TO GO. PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING. IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE, BUT THIS IS

[00:20:05]

PRIME TIME FOR NAPLES. AND WE NEED BETTER COUNTY, CITY AND COUNTY MANAGEMENT. PLEASE.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. GOD BLESS YOU. THANK YOU. MA'AM, OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS JOYCE EDGE.

THANK YOU. I COULD HAVE FIXED THE PIER IN A WEEK, 25 YEARS. EXCUSE ME, SIR, BUT YOU CAN'T SPEAK FROM BACK THERE, SIR. YOU CAN'T. I HAD A MINUTE LEFT. I. SIR, YOU CAN'T SPEAK FROM BACK THERE. PLEASE RESPECT DECORUM. OKAY. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS JOHN MEEHAN. MIA, SORRY. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING, CITY COUNCIL. MY NAME IS JOHN MAYO. OH. SORRY, SIR. OKAY. IS THAT BETTER? IS THAT THE RIGHT DISTANCE? TELL ME WHEN I'M. WHEN I'M GOOD. IS THAT GOOD? ALL RIGHT. MY WIFE SAYS I'M TOO LOUD. ANYWAY, I'M JOHN MAYO. I'M THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COLLIER COUNTY REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. AS YOU ARE AWARE, MANY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND CITY OF NAPLES RESIDENTS ARE DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE PROSPECT OF A DRAG PERFORMANCE BEING HELD IN A PUBLIC PARK IN THE PRESENCE OF CHILDREN. WE HAVE ALL SEEN PHOTOS, VIDEOS OF THE DRAG PERFORMANCE HOSTED BY NAPLES PRIDE IN CAMBIER PARK IN 2022 WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE CITY, WHICH IN WHICH MEN IN G-STRINGS TIGHTS, PROSTHETIC BREASTS SOLICITED AND ACCEPTED TIPS FROM CHILDREN AS THEY PERFORMED SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE SUGGESTIVE DANCE. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. WE APPRECIATE THE CITY IMPOSING RESTRICTIONS ON NAPLES PRIDE, EVEN TO PROTECT THE INNOCENCE OF THE CHILDREN IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE WERE SHOCKED AND DISMAYED WHEN NAPLES PRIDE, WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE ACLU, YOU DECIDED TO FORGO ITS PRIOR AGREEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY AND CHOOSE INSTEAD TO FILE A LAWSUIT IN FEDERAL COURT. I GUESS THAT SHOWS HOW IMPORTANT IT IS TO THEM TO EXPOSE CHILDREN TO THIS SORT OF LEWD PERFORMANCE, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD MAKE US ALL QUESTION THEIR TRUE MOTIVES. BUT I BUT I DIGRESS. I AM HERE TODAY BECAUSE IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THAT YOU INTEND TO DISCUSS SETTLEMENT SETTLING THE LAWSUIT NAPLES PRIDE FILED AGAINST YOU. UNLESS THE SETTLEMENT INCLUDES A PROVISION THAT ANY DRAG SHOW THAT ORGANIZATION WISHES TO HOST WOULD OCCUR INDOORS AND AWAY FROM MINORS, I URGE YOU NOT TO SETTLE THIS LITIGATION. I COMMEND YOU FOR LITIGATING THIS MATTER THUS FAR, AND NOT CAVING TO THE RADICAL LEFTISTS WHOSE VALUES ARE NOT IN LINE WITH THE VALUES OF OUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE CONTINUE TO STAND STRONG FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN AND THE PARENTS AND GRANDPARENTS WHO ELECTED YOU TO THIS POSITION YOU NOW HOLD. I JUST WANT TO ADD, BEFORE I THANK YOU ALL FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. GIVE ME ONE SECOND. I WANT TO JUST TO QUOTE YOU THIS SCRIPTURE VERSE FROM HEBREWS TEN, BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THE PRESSURE. ANY OF YOU THAT FEEL THAT YOU'RE UP THERE BECAUSE I, I FEEL SOME SIMILAR PRESSURE IN THE ROLE, THE ROLE I PLAY. BUT THIS IS THE SCRIPTURE VERSE, HEBREWS TEN. SO DO NOT THROW AWAY YOUR CONFIDENCE. IT WILL BE RICHLY REWARDED. YOU NEED TO PERSEVERE SO THAT WHEN YOU HAVE DONE THE WILL OF GOD, YOU WILL RECEIVE WHAT HE HAS PROMISED. I THANK YOU AND I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING YOU DO FOR US. THANK YOU SIR, THANK YOU SIR. AND JUST AGAIN I CALLED FOR CARDINAL TANNER. TANNER. NO. OKAY. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS JOHN STRAND. MADAM CLERK. GOOD MORNING. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO ADDRESS YOU, COUNCIL. AND I DO WANT TO JUST START BY SAYING THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU'VE DONE TO THIS POINT ON THE NAPLES PRIDE ISSUE. IT DOES TAKE COURAGE, AND THAT'S TO BE NOTED AND LAUDABLE. BUT I'M NOT JUST HERE TO TELL YOU THAT YOU'VE DONE A GOOD JOB. I'M HERE TO SPEAK SOME HARD TRUTH BECAUSE NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE WILL DO THAT. MY NAME IS JOHN STRAND 34108, AND I AM A PRECINCT COMMITTEEMAN HERE IN NAPLES. I

[00:25:07]

HAVE FIVE BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND SIX BEAUTIFUL NIECES AND NEPHEWS. I'M ALSO A FORMER POLITICAL HOSTAGE. BUT BEFORE A WEAPONIZED DOJ THREW ME IN PRISON FOR STANDING UP TO DEFEND OUR REPUBLIC, I FIRST ESCAPED THE COMMUNISM OF CALIFORNIA FOUR YEARS AGO TO DEFEND LIBERTY HERE IN FLORIDA, AND TO DEFEND THE MORALITY THAT MAKES LIBERTY POSSIBLE. YOU CANNOT HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER. LET ME TELL YOU WHAT I LEARNED WHILE WORKING AS AN ACTOR AND WRITER IN HOLLYWOOD. PRIDE IS A VERY AGGRESSIVE, EXPLICITLY SEXUAL ENTERPRISE WITH A TERRIBLY DESTRUCTIVE AGENDA, CONFUSING, DISTORTING, AND THEN DESTROYING THE NATURAL AND HEALTHY DESIGN OF HUMAN SEXUALITY. I ALSO LEARNED THAT THIS AGENDA IS A KEY COMPONENT OF ERODING THE HEALTH AND STRENGTH OF THE FAMILY UNIT, WHICH IS THE CORE STRATEGY OF TOTALITARIANISM. THIS INCLUDES THE USUAL SUSPECTS MARXISM, SOCIALISM, FASCISM, COMMUNISM, ISLAMISM, ALL THE ISMS. THEY ALL LEAD TO TYRANNY. AND TYRANNY IS OUR SWORN ENEMY HERE IN AMERICA, AND ESPECIALLY HERE IN THE FREE STATE OF FLORIDA. WE GIVE TYRANNY NO QUARTER, NO SAFE SPACE FOR IT TO FESTER AND POISON THE FREEDOM WE LOVE, WHICH WE ARE CHARGED TO DEFEND.

NOW, DID YOU NOTICE A COMMON THREAD IN ALL OF THOSE ISMS OF TYRANNY? THEY ALL FEATURE DEVIANT SEXUAL BEHAVIORS. AGAIN, YOU DON'T HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER. AS COUNCILMEN, AS ELECTED LEADERS, WE ARE NOT HERE TO FANTASIZE ABOUT UTOPIA OR HIDE BEHIND THE SOFT LANGUAGE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. OUR DUTY IS TO SPEAK THE TRUTH AND TO ACT ACCORDINGLY WITH WISDOM AND COURAGE, MAKING TOUGH DECISIONS THAT PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AND PRESERVE OUR FREEDOM. THE PROGRESSIVE AND NOW RADICAL LEFT WILL CLAIM THIS IS A FREE SPEECH ISSUE, OR OTHERWISE CONFUSE YOU WITH GRANDSTANDING ABOUT THEIR RIGHT TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT, NO MATTER HOW DESTRUCTIVE. THIS IS A LIE. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FREE SPEECH. THEY HAVE THE SAME RIGHT TO STAND HERE AT THIS PODIUM LIKE ME AND ARGUE THEIR POSITION. BUT YOU AS ELECTED LEADERS HAVE THE RIGHT AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE RIGHTEOUS, MORAL LEGAL DECISIONS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR COMMUNITY AND OUR NATION.

SO LET US SPEAK PLAINLY. SEX IS PRIVATE AND FOR ADULTS ONLY. I'VE SAID IT BEFORE, I WILL CONTINUE TO SAY IT. WE ALL KNOW IT IS TRUE. THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS. WE ALSO KNOW THAT THIS IS OUR CITY AND OUR COUNTY. IT IS OUR COUNTRY. AND TODAY WE ARE REPENTING FROM ANY PAST CONFUSION OR COWARDICE, AND WE ARE STANDING UP FOR THE TRUTH AND FOR WHAT IS GOOD AND DECENT AND HEALTHY, AND IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR FAMILIES AND OUR FUTURE. WE COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY REJECT THE SEXUALLY EXPLICIT PRIDE MOVEMENT AND ITS UNMISTAKABLE AGENDA OF SEXUAL CONFUSION, GROOMING CHILDREN, ERODING FAMILIES, AND POISONING SOCIETY. THIS DESTRUCTIVE AGENDA IS NOT WELCOME IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA. I URGE YOU TO PROHIBIT DENY ALL PERMITS, ISSUE A DECLARATION FROM THE CITY THAT WE VALUE DECENCY, AND WE WILL DEFEND IT HERE, AND THAT THIS AGENDA IS NOT WELCOME IN ANY QUARTER OF OUR TOWN.

THERE IS NO EXCUSE OR REASON FOR IT. WE DON'T WANT IT HERE, AND IT IS NOT ONLY OUR RIGHT, BUT OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO STOP IT HERE AND NOW. AND FRANKLY, I'M SICK OF WAITING FOR OTHER LEADERS TO DO THIS. SO I'M RUNNING FOR CONGRESS TO MAKE SURE WE GET IT STARTED NOW. THE COUNCIL PREVIOUSLY VOTED TO RETAIN HOME RULE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES. THAT WAS THE RIGHT DECISION. I URGE YOU TO UPHOLD THAT SAME LAWFUL RESPONSIBILITY AND PROHIBIT ALL SEXUAL GROOMING IN OUR COMMUNITY, BECAUSE IT'S JUST COMMON SENSE AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, BECAUSE IT'S CRITICAL TO DEFENDING OUR FREEDOM AND PRESERVING OUR FUTURE. THE NATION IS WATCHING. HISTORY IS RECORDING, AND OUR CHILDREN ARE LISTENING. WE WILL NEVER STAND DOWN AND NEVER SELL OUT IN THE FIGHT TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT. THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS THE GREAT STATE OF FLORIDA AND THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I HAVE JAY KOHLHAGEN. GOOD MORNING, GOOD MORNING. MORNING. HEY, JAY KOHLHAGEN 34112. HEY COUNCIL MEMBERS, THE FIRST AMENDMENT WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE STRETCHED OR DISTORTED BEYOND OUR FOUNDERS INTENT, AND IT WAS NEVER WRITTEN TO BE A PROMOTER OF ENTERTAINMENT. RIGHT NOW, OUTSIDE FORCES ARE TRYING TO WRECK THE CITY OF NAPLES AND PRESSURE THIS COUNCIL INTO SURRENDER. THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO BOW, TO PRESSURE OR SETTLE THE NAPLES PRIDE LAWSUIT. WE

[00:30:01]

EXPECT THIS COUNCIL TO HOLD STEADFAST AND, IF NECESSARY, TAKE THIS CASE ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT AND END THIS NONSENSE FOR GOOD AND AND FOR ALL THIS COUNTRY, TOO. BECAUSE SHOWING WEAKNESS HERE WILL ONLY SET NAPLES AND THE COUNTRY UP FOR MORE LAWSUITS IN THE FUTURE.

AND THIS IS THIS IS ACTUALLY BIGGER THAN NAPLES, AND THE WHOLE COUNTRY IS WATCHING WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE THE NEXT FEW WEEKS. THAT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE BUMPY ROAD, BUT I THINK WE CAN GET THERE. MAY, MAY, MAY GOD BE WITH THE COUNCIL AND THE POLICE CHIEF ON THIS ON THIS JOURNEY. TO WRAP THIS UP, LET'S SHOW THE COUNTRY NAPLES, FLORIDA REFUSES TO BE SHAKEN DOWN. THANK YOU. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS DARREN AKIN AQUINO. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING.

JUST STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. I'M NOT GOING TO HAVE TO TELL YOU WHO I AM AGAIN.

RIGHT. WE ALL KNOW I'M THE NATIONAL CHIEF ADVOCATE FOR DISABLED IN MY ARGUMENT UNDER THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, NOT ALL FIRST AMENDMENT IS FREE. IT CAN CAUSE FORESEEABLE HARM.

SPEAKING FOR THE DISABLED COMMUNITY OF CHILDREN DEVELOPMENTALLY DELAYED, THIS FREEDOM IS PROTECTED MORE UNDER THE 14TH AMENDMENT THAN THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT. I'M NOT AGAINST THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT. IT SHOULD BE CONTAINED TO AN ADULT AREA. THIS IS ADULT CONTENT. THIS CONFUSES OUR VULNERABLE CHILDREN. I MADE THIS ARGUMENT TO THE COURTS.

THEY TRIED TO MAKE MY ARGUMENT THE SAME AS YOURS AT THE APPELLATE COURT. IT'S NOT. I SPECIFICALLY FIGHT FOR AMERICA'S VULNERABLE. I'M THE FIRST GUY THAT STARTED IN THE COUNTRY WITH A NATIONAL GROUP. I'M VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS. I MARCHED IN GAY PRIDE PARADE.

AS A UNION ACTOR, I SUPPORT THEIR FREEDOM. I'M NOT AGAINST IT. BUT THESE THINGS NEED TO BE CONTAINED BECAUSE IT'S ADULT CONTENT. NOW, I'M A PROUD AMERICAN. I'M. I BELIEVE IN THE EQUAL PROTECTION, BUT THEY FORSAKE THE PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE CHILDREN. THEY WANT TO DO IT IN THE PARK, NOT CARING. COME ON, THAT'S JUST WRONG. THE ARGUMENT IS GOOD AND IT'S RIGHT. IT'S NOT INFRINGING ON THEM. IT'S PROTECTING AMERICA'S VULNERABLE. SOME OF THEM MAY BE FUTURE HEROES, SO WE HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THAT IN THE SETTLEMENT. WE WILL NOT SETTLE THAT. IT WILL NOT BE DISPLAYED TO THEM. I WILL FIGHT. THE FIRST ONE WAS A WARNING.

THE NEXT TIME I COME BACK WITH CHIEF COUNSEL. THIS WAS TO MAKE THEM AWARE. WE'RE NOT AGAINST YOU. WAKE UP. BE ADULTS. COME ON. THIS IS ADULT CONTENT. THESE ARE MINOR, VULNERABLE CHILDREN THAT WOULD BE CONFUSED. THEY WOULD GO INTO SCHOOL IN SOME ARGUMENTS AND SAY, I DON'T KNOW, I MIGHT BE A GIRL. I MIGHT BE A GUY I DON'T KNOW. AS THEY'RE LEARNING AND DEVELOPING THEIR MINDS, WE HAVE TO STOP IT. WE KEEP IT WHERE IT BELONGS. THEIR FREEDOM BELONGS IN THE SPACE FOR ADULT CONTENT, NOT IN OPEN PUBLIC PARKS. OKAY. AND THAT'S IT. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR SERVICE. THANK YOU. I DO NOT HAVE ANY FURTHER PUBLIC SPEAKERS. OKAY. THAT CONCLUDES

[APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA]

OUR PUBLIC COMMENT. AND THAT MOVES TO THE CONSENT AGENDA COUNCIL. THERE'S NO. NO OBJECTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. AND A SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISMAN AND A SECOND BY VICE MAYOR. ALL IN FAVOR SIGNED BY I. I OPPOSED THANK YOU. COUNCIL THAT APPROVES THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOVING TO ITEM NINE. THERE AREN'T ANY PUBLIC

[13.A) A Resolution Approving a License Agreement Between the City of Naples and Naples Girls Softball for the Use of Cambier Park and Fleischmann Park Facilities to Conduct a Youth Softball League at Cambier Park and Fleischmann Park for a Three-Year Term with Two One-year Extensions; Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Use Agreement; Providing for Scrivener’s Errors; and Providing an Effective Date. ]

HEARINGS GOING TO REGULAR AGENDA. WE'LL MOVE DOWN TO NEW BUSINESS ITEM 13 A. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. MAYOR, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR. ITEM HERE. SO THIS ITEM IS A SORRY, MR. MAYOR, BEFORE YOU START, MAYOR, MAY I READ THE RESOLUTION? YES. THANK YOU, MISS MR. MCCONNELL. YES. NO PROBLEM. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NAPLES AND NAPLES. GIRLS SOFTBALL FOR THE USE OF CAMBIER PARK AND PARK FACILITIES. TO CONDUCT A YOUTH SOFTBALL LEAGUE AT CAMBRIA PARK AND PARK FOR A THREE YEAR TERM, WITH TWO ONE YEAR EXTENSIONS. AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LICENSE AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, MR. MAYOR, I WAS GOING TO BEAT MATTHEW TO THAT. BUT SO AGAIN, CHAD MERRITT, COMMUNITY SERVICES

[00:35:05]

DIRECTOR, THIS ITEM IS THIS WAS A 25 YEAR AGREEMENT THAT'S COMING TO CLOSE. THIS WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999. THE YOUTH OUR YOUTH SPORTS. AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT ALL THREE OF THEM.

BUT YOU KNOW, THEY'RE VERY IMPORTANT TO OUR COMMUNITY. THEY'RE IMPORTANT TO THE PARKS.

AND WE'VE FACILITATED THESE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. THIS AGREEMENT IS UP FOR RENEWAL.

BUT ONE THING THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DO DIFFERENTLY IS A LOT CHANGES IN 25 YEARS, INCLUDING THE ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERS FROM BOTH SIDES AS WELL AS TRENDS. THE PARKS CHANGE, FINANCIALS CHANGE, PARTICIPATION CHANGES. SO WE WANT TO GO TO A FIVE YEAR AGREEMENT, WHICH IS PRETTY STANDARD WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE DO, WHICH WOULD BE ACTUALLY A THREE YEAR AGREEMENT WITH TWO OPTIONS FOR TWO ONE YEAR RENEWALS. AND THAT ALLOWS US TO EVALUATE BOTH OF THE ORGANIZATIONS TO EVALUATE WHERE WE STAND. A COUPLE OF THINGS ON THIS, AND I WANTED TO KIND OF GIVE YOU A FEEL FOR WHAT IT TAKES. AND WHEN YOU OPERATE THESE TYPES OF PROGRAMS, SO THEY USE THIS FIELD OR THESE FIELDS. EXCUSE ME, WE'VE HAD TO SHIFT THEM A LITTLE BIT.

CAMBIER PARK IS THEIR MAIN HOME, AND WE HAVE TO SHIP THEM TO FLEISHMAN PARK ON OCCASIONS, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE HAVE SPECIAL EVENTS, BECAUSE THEY DON'T THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO PLAY OR PRACTICE THERE. SO WE HAVE MADE A SPACE AT FLEISHMAN PARK SO THAT THEY CAN USE THAT WHEN THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO USE CAMBIER PARK IN ADDITION. SO THEY RUN A FALL LEAGUE, WHICH IS FROM SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER. THEY RUN A SPRING LEAGUE, WHICH IS FEBRUARY TO MAY. THEY USE ABOUT 28 WEEKS OUT OF THE YEAR. WE SPEND ABOUT 52. AND THIS IS A ROUGH ESTIMATE BASED ON WHAT WE COULD COME UP WITH ON MAINTAINING THE FIELDS, THAT'S MOWING THE FIELDS, FERTILIZING THE FIELDS, LINING FIELDS, ALL THAT. WE, THE CITY RECEIVES ABOUT $5,200 IN REVENUE FOR THE SOFTBALL LEAGUE. ABOUT 14% OF THE PARTICIPANTS RESIDE IN THE CITY, AND THAT FLUCTUATES DEPENDING ON, I GUESS, PARTICIPATION. EACH YEAR THE CITY ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT IN 99, AS I SAID, AND IT ENDS ACTUALLY ENDED TWO DAYS AGO. ONE OF THE THINGS WHEN THEY ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT, THEY ENTERED IN, AND THEY MADE AN ADJUSTMENT IN 2001 WHERE THE CITY FRONTED BASICALLY $155,500 THROUGH RESOLUTION 019364, WHICH IS ATTACHED IN THERE.

THIS WAS FOR THE THE STANDS. THEY INSTALLED THE STANDS, DID A COUPLE OTHER WORK. AND THE AGREEMENT IN THAT RESOLUTION WAS THAT THEY WOULD PAY THAT IN GOOD FAITH. AND WITHIN THE 25 YEARS, THE OUTSTANDING BALANCE RIGHT NOW IS 64,000. ACTUALLY, IT'S A I THINK LISA CAME IN TO CONFIRM THAT BECAUSE THERE WAS A PAYMENT MADE AROUND 63,000 AND SOME CHANGE, AND THE THIS WAS THIS IS LEFT OVER FROM THAT ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. OBVIOUSLY THE GIRLS SOFTBALL ORIGINALLY IT WAS GREATER NAPLES. NOW IT'S NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL. THERE'S BEEN SOME LEADERSHIP CHANGES OVER THE YEARS. AND YOU KNOW, SO THAT THAT'S KIND OF HOW A LOT OF THAT HAS STOPPED. I THINK THEY WERE MAKING PAYMENTS PRETTY CONSISTENT RIGHT AT THE START. AND THAT HAS PUT THEM INTO THE SITUATION THEY'RE IN RIGHT NOW. AND I THINK MARTIN I BELIEVE MARTIN'S. YEAH MARTIN'S HERE. SO IF WE NEED HIM TO KIND OF SPEAK ON SOME OF THAT WE CAN. THAT'S NEITHER HERE NOR THERE.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE LOOKED AT, WE DID TAKE THE CSB, CSB AND THE AGREEMENT THAT'S IN FRONT OF YOU IS BASICALLY ALLOWING THEM WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS TO TRY TO SETTLE THAT, THAT BALANCE OF 63,000 AND SOME CHANGE. BUT ONE THING THAT WE ALSO WANTED TO MAKE A CHANGE ON IS THE FEE STRUCTURE. THE FEE STRUCTURES REMAIN PRETTY MUCH THE SAME FOR A WHILE, SO THAT'S $3 PER PARTICIPANT PER WEEK. SO IF YOU LOOK ON HERE, WE'RE STILL KEEPING THAT BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE A DRASTIC CHANGE AND COMPROMISE THEIR EXISTENCE, BECAUSE IF WE PRICE IT TOO HIGH, THEN WE COULD POTENTIALLY LOSE OUR OUR LEAGUES. AND THESE LEAGUES ARE WHAT I WOULD CONSIDER TRADITIONAL RECREATION LEAGUES, WHICH MEAN ANYONE CAN COME AND PARTICIPATE. AND THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT IN OUR SOCIETY AND YOUTH SPORTS. SO $3 PER PARTICIPANT PER WEEK FOR THE FIRST THREE YEARS. AND THEN WE WOULD INCREASE THAT

[00:40:01]

INCREMENTALLY. YEAR FOUR WE WOULD GO UP AN EXTRA DOLLAR. AND THEN YEAR FIVE WE WOULD GO UP AN EXTRA DOLLAR. AND THAT WOULD BE $4 PER PARTICIPANT PER WEEK ON YEAR FOUR, OR $5 PER PARTICIPANT PER PARTICIPANT PER WEEK ALL YEAR FIVE. WE WOULD ALSO ADD IN THE MAINTENANCE FEE.

THE MAINTENANCE FEE HELPS US WITH MAINTAINING THE FIELD AND I KNOW WE GET WE HAVE A LOT OF TIME AND ENERGY THAT'S SPENT IN BOTH SIDES, BUT WE'VE DONE SOME SOME RENOVATIONS TO THE FIELDS TO BRING IT TO WHAT WE FEEL IS THE STANDARD OF WHAT THE FIELDS SHOULD BE. LASER GRADING. WE WENT IN AND RECUT THE ALL OF THE FIELDS SO THAT THEY THEY'RE STANDARD AND THEY MEET THE REGULATION. WE'VE WENT IN AND MADE REPAIRS TO THE WARNING TRACKS. WE'VE JUST RECENTLY INSTALLED A A WIND SCREEN SO THAT IT HELPS WITH THE BATTER'S VIEW. IF YOU'VE AGAIN, IF YOU PLAY BASEBALL OR PLAYED ANY SPORTS, YOU KNOW HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS. BUT WE'VE DONE SOME THINGS. THE FENCE HAS BEEN REPLACED. WE'VE DONE SOME LIGHTING UPGRADES. SO WE JUST WE FEEL THAT THIS MAINTENANCE FEE WOULD JUST BE A LITTLE BIT THAT WOULD HELP WITH OFFSETTING SOME OF THOSE COSTS. THAT WAS OPTION ONE WAS TO DO THE $3 KEEP WITH THE $3 PER PARTICIPANT PER WEEK, AND THEN THE MAINTENANCE FEE. OPTION TWO WAS IS TO USE THE CURRENT RENTAL RATE OF $35 AN HOUR, AND THE ESTIMATED COST FOR TWO FIELDS, IF THEY UTILIZE TWO FIELDS, WOULD BE AROUND 23,005 90, WHICH THAT'S A LOT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE CHART UP ABOVE, YOU CAN SEE THAT WHAT'S KIND OF PROJECTED. IF YOU REMEMBER WHEN I SAID BACK HERE IT WAS FOR $5,200, IS GENERALLY ABOUT WHAT THEY PAY PER YEAR OR PER SEASON. SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT GOING UP THAT MUCH, WE FEEL THAT THAT WOULD PRICE THEM OUT. AND THAT'S NOT WHAT THE GOAL WAS FOR US. AND BUT THAT IS THE OTHER OPTION IS TO CHARGE THE CURRENT RENTAL RATE COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD. AGAIN, THEY WANTED TO GO WITH OPTION ONE. THEY FELT THAT THE THE BALANCE SHOULD BE PAID WITHIN THE FIVE YEAR AGREEMENT. AND FOR US SELECTING OPTION ONE, IT MADE MORE SENSE BECAUSE THAT MEANS THE MORE PARTICIPANTS THAT REGISTER, THE MORE THAT THEY PAY. THE MORE PARTICIPANTS THAT ARE ON THE FIELD, THE MORE IT COSTS US TO MAINTAIN THE FIELD. SO THAT ONLY MADE SENSE. AND BOTH PARTIES AGREED THAT THAT WOULD BE A BETTER OPTION FOR THEM. OBVIOUSLY, THIS IS AN OPTION AND A RECOMMENDATION, AND CITY COUNCIL CAN DECIDE IF IF THERE'S A DIFFERENT ROUTE THAT THEY WANT TO GO. LASTLY, WE WOULD WANT TO MAKE AND THIS WILL BE THE CASE WITH ALL THREE OF THESE. WE WANT THEM TO START ON JANUARY 1ST, AND EVERY YEAR WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO RENEW ALL THREE OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME SO THEY CAN STAY CONSISTENT.

OVER THE YEARS, THEY'VE KIND OF ALL MADE THEIR OWN, MORPHED INTO THEIR OWN TYPE OF AGREEMENT. IT WASN'T CONSISTENT, AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT CONSISTENCY, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE'RE MAINTAINING THESE AGREEMENTS WITH OUR ATHLETIC GROUPS, THAT IS REALLY A SUMMARY ON WHERE WE'RE HERE OR WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY. AND ANY QUESTIONS OR ANY COMMENTS WE WELCOME. AND WE DO HAVE THE ORGANIZERS HERE AS WELL. I DO HAVE A MR. KURTZ HERE AS A PUBLIC SPEAKER, BUT I'LL LET COUNCIL ASK QUESTIONS. FIRST OF ALL, I THINK THAT 63,000 THAT'S OUTSTANDING. I THINK WE COULD HAVE A FUNDRAISER TOMORROW AND GET THAT PAID OFF. I, MY MY DAUGHTER PLAYED THERE. THIS IS A COMMUNITY SOFTBALL FIELD AND WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO WHATEVER WE POSSIBLY CAN, IN MY OPINION, TO PROTECT THIS OPPORTUNITY FOR SOFTBALL FIELD FOR THE GIRLS. WE HAD SPECIAL EVENTS THAT WERE CAUSING THEM TO HAVE TO GO TO ANOTHER FIELD.

BUT IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING WE HAVE NO LONGER ACCEPT ANY SPECIAL EVENTS ON THAT FIELD.

SO WE JUST HAVE THE ONE CAR'S ON FIFTH, BUT EVEN WHEN IT'S NOT ON THE FIELD, UNDERSTANDING THAT SPECIAL EVENT IN THE PARK STILL DISRUPTS THE THE LEAGUE ITSELF. BECAUSE IF IT'S WE HAVE STREETS BLOCKED OFF, IF THE PARKING IS LIMITED, THEN THEY HAVE TO SHIFT AND MOVE TO ANOTHER FACILITY FOR THAT TIME ON THAT WEEKEND. WELL, THAT I WANT TO BETTER UNDERSTAND HOW MANY TIMES AND WHY A STREET CLOSURE WOULD KEEP THEM FROM BEING ABLE TO USE IT. BUT AND MAYBE WE NEED TO RECONSIDER THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, WE ARE ALLOWING IS IT JUST CARS ON

[00:45:05]

FIFTH NOW THAT USES THAT SOFTBALL FIELD? THAT'S THE ONLY SPECIAL EVENT LEFT THAT WE'VE MOVED TO OTHERS, AND THEY PAY TO REPAIR THE FIELD. THEY DID OKAY. I THINK. OH, AND THE FEE STRUCTURE, I'M NOT SURE. I, I LOOK TO MY COLLEAGUES TO THAT INCREASE IN PAY, BUT I'LL ASK THE MR. KURTZ HOW THAT WORKS OUT. I HAVE FOR NOW. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. VICE MAYOR. YEAH. THANK YOU CHAD, I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT YOU AND YOUR TEAM PUT ON THESE ITEMS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE A QUICK COMMENT THAT I'M ONE OF THOSE DADS THAT SPENT YEARS ON A FIVE GALLON BUCKET CATCHING PITCHES AND FAST PITCH. AND BY THE WAY, I WAS COACH OF THE SCREAMERS, ATTENDING UNDER TEAM FOR, WELL, UNTIL THEY REALLY GREW UP AND GOT OUT OF THAT AGE GROUP. AND THERE'S A REASON THEY'RE CALLED THE SCREAMERS. BUT THIS, THIS BALLPARK FOR ME AND AS A CITY COUNCIL PERSON, YOU'RE GOING TO MANY OF US WILL DEAL WITH THIS FOR MANY YEARS, AND I AND THAT'S THE CASE HERE. BUT IT'S A SPECIAL PLACE. IT'S A SPECIAL ASSET FOR OUR COMMUNITY, NOT JUST CAMBIER PARK, BUT THESE OTHER AGENDA ITEMS UNDER DIFFERENT ITEMS THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY. AND I'M JUST A BIG ADVOCATE OF MAINTAINING THEM. I KNOW THAT THERE WAS AN EXPENSE AS A PARENT TO HAVE MY DAUGHTER JOIN AND MY SON JOIN DIFFERENT LEAGUES, RIGHT? BECAUSE THERE'S YOU CAN SEE THESE NUMBERS HERE, THERE'S SOME EXPENSES INVOLVED, AND THAT'S WHAT IT TAKES. IF YOU'RE GOING TO RUN, AS CHAD SAID, YOU RUN A QUALITY. VENUE AND YOU KEEP IT TO SPECS AND REGULATION AND SOME THAT PEOPLE CAN BE PROUD OF AND, AND HAVE MEMORIES OF. SO AND I KNOW MANY OF US, WE HEARKEN BACK TO WHAT WE DID AS KIDS, BUT IT'S JUST A GREAT I HOPE EVERYTHING GOES ON THIS ITEM ACCORDING TO WHAT WE NEED TO HAVE DONE, BUT I SUPPORT IT.

AND. AND AS THE MAYOR SAID, I THINK THE MONEY CAN BE RAISED THROUGH DIFFERENT MEANS, BUT JUST GREAT WORK AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THE CITY STAFF DOES ON MAINTAINING ALL OF THESE FACILITIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTMAN. THANK YOU MAYOR. UNLIKE THE VICE MAYOR, I NEVER COACHED GIRLS SOFTBALL. IT WAS ONE OF THE FEW KIDS SPORTS I DIDN'T COACH, AND ALL OF MY COACHING WAS DONE TOTALLY WITHOUT ANY QUALIFICATION OR ABILITY. EXACTLY. SO I COULD HAVE COACHED GIRLS SOFTBALL TO. BUT I'M GENERALLY I'M VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS AS WELL. I KNOW PEOPLE, BOTH KIDS AND ADULTS, WHO HAVE PLAYED NOT JUST IN GIRLS SOFTBALL, BUT BOYS AND MEN'S SOFTBALL AT OUR PARKS. AND I THINK THE FACT THAT WE HAVE THESE FACILITIES IN OUR CITY, AND THEY'RE USED AND PRIZED BY SO MANY IN OUR COMMUNITY, IS JUST A WONDERFUL PART OF WHAT MAKES NAPLES, NAPLES, AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE FROM OUTSIDE THE CITY ARE A BIG PART OF THE USERS OF THIS DOESN'T BOTHER ME ONE BIT. YOU KNOW, IT'S A THERE'S A LOT OF SEAMLESSNESS BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY, AND IT'S GOOD FOR FOR EVERYBODY. AND I THINK THIS HAS LONG BEEN A VERY POSITIVE PART OF NAPLES. I JUST HAD A COUPLE QUESTIONS. THE FIRST IS, AM I AM I TO BELIEVE THEN THAT GIVEN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT 25 YEARS AGO OR AGREEMENT 25 YEARS AGO, FOR 155,000 ROUGHLY, AND NOW IT'S AT 63,000 THAT APPROXIMATELY 90,000 HAS BEEN RAISED AND PAID BACK TO THE CITY BY THE ORGANIZERS. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. 90,000 OVER 25 YEARS? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. SO MY CONCERN IS I APPRECIATE THE MAYOR'S COMMENTS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WE COULD DO A FUNDRAISER TOMORROW. THEY COULD DO A FUNDRAISER TOMORROW AND RAISE THIS MONEY. I DON'T KNOW, I WOULD HOPE AND SUPPORT THAT THAT IF THAT COULD OCCUR. BUT THEY'VE RAISED 90,000 OVER 25 YEARS. THAT'S A LITTLE OVER 3000 A YEAR. I'M CONCERNED

[00:50:01]

ABOUT HAVING A PROVISION IN THE NEW AGREEMENT THAT THEY WILL SOMEHOW COME UP WITH 63,000 IN 5 YEARS, WHICH WOULD BE IF YOU JUST DO THE MATH, WHAT ABOUT $14,000 A YEAR WHEN THEY'VE BEEN RAISING ABOUT 3000 AND CHANGE A YEAR? I DON'T WANT TO PUT SOMETHING INTO THE NEW AGREEMENT. THAT IS UNREALISTIC. AND SO WHOEVER'S SITTING HERE ON COUNCIL FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, YOU KNOW, HAS WELL, YOU DIDN'T DO WHAT YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO DO. SEE WHAT I'M SAYING? AND WE'RE AND WE'RE IN EFFECT JUST KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD. SO I JUST WANT TO RAISE THAT AS A CONCERN AND, AND, AND MAKE SURE WE'RE IF WE INCLUDE THAT WE'RE GOING INTO IT BOTH ON OUR SIDE AND THE ORGANIZER SIDE WITH EYES WIDE OPEN. YEAH. AND THE REASON WE WE CARRIED THAT NUMBER IN THERE WITH CONTRACT WAS BECAUSE THAT WAS AN ORIGINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THAT ORGANIZATION, AND WE DIDN'T FEEL WE HAD THE RIGHT TO TO TAKE THAT AND SAY, OKAY, WELL, HERE'S THE NEW AGREEMENTS. FIVE YEARS, IF YOU PAY 50% OF IT, THEN THAT'S GOOD. WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT WAS IN HERE AND HAD THIS CONVERSATION, BECAUSE I THINK THAT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE, TOO, THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT THE BALANCE IS. AND AGAIN, I MADE THE STATEMENT, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF CHANGES WITH THE ORGANIZATION, AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT KIND OF STALLED SOME OF THAT, BECAUSE THEN YOU'RE TRYING TO GET YOUR FEET BACK UP. AND I THINK THAT THAT SLOWED THEM UP A LITTLE BIT. THERE'S SOME SOME NEW PLAYERS, NO PUN INTENDED, THAT ARE COMING BACK INTO THE MIX OF THIS. AND I THINK THAT COULD BE VERY BENEFICIAL FOR THE ORGANIZATION ITSELF AS WELL. THAT'S GOOD. AGAIN, I THINK IT'S. VERY COMMENDABLE THAT THEY'VE YOU KNOW, THESE ARE VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATIONS, COMPLETELY VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION, AND THAT THEY'VE RAISED $90,000 IN 25 YEARS. TO ME, THAT'S IMPRESSIVE FOR JUST A VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION. AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S REASONABLE TO EXPECT THEM TO RAISE OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. BUT THAT'S REALLY THE QUESTION I'M PUTTING ON THE TABLE. AND I ALSO WANT TO ADD RECENTLY THEY DID RECEIVE A DONATION FROM SOMEONE TO REPLACE THE SCOREBOARD. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OF THEM AS WELL. SO THERE THAT'S ABOUT $20,000 THAT WAS DONATED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE SCOREBOARD. SO THEY'RE GETTING READY. WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT REPLACING THAT AND WORKING WITH THEM ON THAT. SO THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL 20,000 THAT WAS RAISED. BUT THERE'S ONGOING EXPENSES THAT THEY HAVE THAT THEY HAVE TO DO. YOU GOT UNIFORMS AND YOU GOT ALL SORTS OF THINGS. EQUIPMENT. LET'S NOT TALK ABOUT OR FORGET THE EQUIPMENT. THE EQUIPMENT IS VERY EXPENSIVE. A BAT THAT WHEN I WAS A KID WAS IF YOU BOUGHT $100 BAT, YOU WERE LIKE THE CREAM OF THE CROP. BUT NOW, I MEAN, THEY'RE FIVE, $600, SO IT'S IT'S A IT'S EXPENSIVE. YEAH. SO I DID WANT TO THROW THAT IN AS WELL BECAUSE ANYWAY THAT'S, THAT'S MY, MY FIRST QUESTION. AND I JUST WOULD LIKE TO SEE US HAVE WHATEVER WE SAY ABOUT THAT IN WHATEVER WE AGREE TO HAVE IT BE SOMETHING THAT IS.

CHEAP THAT WE THINK IS ACHIEVABLE. AND THEN NUMBER TWO, MY OTHER QUESTION. I HADN'T EVEN THOUGHT ABOUT THIS BEFORE, BUT YOU BROUGHT IT UP. AND WHEN THE MAYOR WAS MAKING HER COMMENTS, YOU KNOW, IT SAYS HERE IN THE AGENDA MEMORANDUM, THEIR SEASON IS IS SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER AND THEN FEBRUARY TO MAY. WELL, FEBRUARY TO MAY INCLUDES SOME OF THE BUSIEST MONTHS IN OUR SPECIAL EVENTS SEASON. RIGHT. SO I'M JUST IT BOTHERED ME TO HEAR YOU SAY THAT WHEN THERE ARE EVENTS IN CAMBIER PARK THAT THAT AND RELATED THINGS LIKE STREET CLOSURES THAT THAT COULD HAVE THE IMPACT OF OF PREVENTING THEM FROM HAVING THEIR GAMES IN THERE. AND, AND I GUESS BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF AVAILABLE PARKING OR I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE REASONS ARE, BUT IF WE'RE IF THAT'S OCCURRING AND THERE ARE MORE THAN JUST A COUPLE OF TIMES WHERE THAT'S IMPACTING THE SITUATION, THAT'S SOMETHING WE SHOULD. FIGURE OUT HOW TO FIX. BECAUSE WHAT'S THE POINT OF THEM HAVING AN AGREEMENT WITH US THAT SAYS THEY'RE GOING TO PAY FOR AND BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THIS FIELD, AND THEN THEY CAN'T DO IT, RIGHT? SO AND AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW THE EXTENT OF HOW THAT WOULD IMPACT THEM AT CAMBIER, BUT. WE SHOULD ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT THAT WE CAN'T FULFILL FROM OUR END. THANK YOU. THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTMAN, ON THOSE NOTES, DID YOU FIND OUT THE HISTORY OF

[00:55:10]

THAT PAYMENT FOR THE STADIUM BLEACHERS? THE HISTORY? I'VE GOT, THE RESOLUTIONS. I'VE ONLY WENT BACK AS FAR AS THE MINUTES OF HOW THAT CAME ABOUT, BECAUSE I DIDN'T LOOK AT IT, BUT I DIDN'T, BECAUSE IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT, I MEAN, THE CITY COULD HAVE PAID FOR IT BECAUSE IT'S PART OF OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. BUT THE RESIDENTS AND THE PLAYERS AND THE LEADERSHIP AT THAT TIME SAID, WE WANT NEW BLEACHERS. WE'LL TAKE IT ON. AND I THINK, AS YOU CORRECTLY STATED, THAT, YOU KNOW, LEADERSHIP CHANGES. DID THEY EVEN KNOW THEY HAD THIS OUTSTANDING DEBT? WE'VE HAD LEADERSHIP CHANGES. THEY'VE HAD LEADERSHIP CHANGES. YOU KNOW, IS HAS SOMEONE KEPT TRACK OF THAT, ENCOURAGED ANY FUNDRAISERS IN THE PARK OR, YOU KNOW, HAVE WE DONE ANYTHING TO LET THE NEW LEADERSHIP KNOW THAT THERE'S AN OUTSTANDING BALANCE? SO I THINK THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO LOOK INTO. AND I ARE AWARE OF IT. THEY ARE AWARE AND THEY DO THEIR FUNDRAISING BECAUSE THAT WAS 33 YEARS AGO WHEN THOSE BLEACHERS HAPPENED. I MEAN, I WAS PART OF THAT GROUP SAYING, YES, WE'LL PAY FOR IT. BUT I FORGOT ABOUT THAT DEBT. I MEAN, NO ONE SAID SENT ME AN EMAIL AND SAID, YOU KNOW, HEY, HERE'S YOUR $100 EVERY YEAR. YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T ASK FOR IT EVERY YEAR. SO I THINK THAT'S A VERY GOOD POINT. AND THEN THE NUMBER OF EVENTS, I THINK IT'S AN EXCELLENT POINT THAT WE KNOW HOW MANY EVENTS ARE CONFLICTING TO WHERE THEY CAN'T BE IN THE PARK, AND WE'RE TELLING THEM TO GO SOMEPLACE ELSE. I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING WE HAVE TO ANALYZE. YEAH. YES. MR. MAYOR ONE, JUST FROM A FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE, I DO WANT YOU TO KNOW THE CITY CONTINUED TO SEND NORMAL BILLS ON OUTSTANDING BALANCE, AS THEY ALWAYS WOULD. SO I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THE CITY WOULD DO TO THAT PART. BUT TO YOUR OTHER POINT, I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY. AND QUANTIFYING THE NUMBER OF TIMES THEY HAVE TO MOVE BECAUSE OF SPECIAL EVENTS GOES TO THE BROADER CAMBIER PARK. OVERALL SPECIAL EVENTS, QUANTITY, SIZE, ALL OF THOSE THINGS. DISCUSSION. AND SO BY THE TIME WE DO RECONVENE FOR THAT, I WOULD WE SHOULD BE PROVIDING YOU WITH THE NUMBER OF INSTANCES WHEN WE'VE HAD TO MOVE THEM. SO YOU'RE AWARE. SO WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT'S IN THAT PACKAGE. AND SO I HAVE THAT NUMBER ACTUALLY THEY JUST PROVIDED 37 TIMES IS WHAT ONE HOW MANY TIMES THEY WILL HAVE TO MOVE BECAUSE OF SPECIAL EVENTS THIS YEAR. BY THEIR CHOICE OR BECAUSE WE TELL THEM WE'RE HAVING A SPECIAL EVENT AND THEY CAN'T HOLD THEIR SOFTBALL GAME WHEN WHEN THEY HAVE A SPECIAL EVENT. IT IS THAT LARGE OF A DISRUPTION IN THE PARK THAT THEY HAVE LITERALLY NO. IF WE LET THEM HAVE THE GAME AND THEY SHOW UP AND THERE'S 6000 PEOPLE IN THE PARK, THERE'S NO PARKING. SO NOW YOU GOT PARENTS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET THE KIDS TO THE SOFTBALL FIELD. SO WE SHIFTED, WHICH IS WHAT WE DID WITH FLEISHMAN PARK WHEN WE WENT OVER. AND WE PREPARED A FIELD SO THAT THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN. AND THAT WAS A CHALLENGE FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO TO CONTINUE TO TRY TO HAVE A LEAGUE. WHILE THERE WAS SPECIAL EVENT AFTER SPECIAL EVENT AFTER SPECIAL EVENT, AND IT WAS HAPPENING AGAIN 37 TIMES IS WHAT THEY'RE SCHEDULED TO MOVE AND WE WORK WITH THEM AND IT'S, HEY, DO YOU WANT TO MOVE OVER HERE ON THIS DAY? OR HOW DO YOU WANT TO DO THIS? AND SO THAT'S A DISCUSSION WE NEED TO HAVE ON THE SPECIAL EVENTS PIECE. BUT AS I RECALL I'D GO TO THE GAME.

THERE WAS AN ART SHOW. WE WALKED THROUGH THE ART SHOW. WE'D GO HAVE LUNCH AT REGINA'S AND OR ICE CREAM AT REGINA'S. SO USUALLY THEY WOULD KIND OF BLEND TOGETHER, NOT CAUSE US TO NOT ENJOY A SPECIAL EVENT WHILE THERE WAS A GAME. BUT THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNCIL MEMBER.

BARTON. THANK YOU. YEAH. IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE. RECOGNIZE THE BALANCE THAT'S OWED AND WE GET THEM BACK ON TRACK FOR PAYMENTS. BUT EQUALLY AS IMPORTANT, MAYBE EVEN MORE IMPORTANT IS THAT WE MAINTAIN WE FIGURE OUT A STRUCTURE SO THAT WE CAN KEEP THE LEAGUE OPERATIONAL, WHICH IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE MAKING THE EFFORT TO DO SO. AND IT SOUNDS LIKE PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M IF I'M MISTAKEN ON ANY OF THESE STATEMENTS. SOUNDS LIKE YOU'VE YOU'VE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE NEW LEAGUE LEADERSHIP. AND OPTION ONE SEEMS TO BE AN AGREEABLE. AVENUE PATH FOR THAT SOLUTION. WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST IS, AND I AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN

[01:00:09]

CHRISTIAN WHOLEHEARTEDLY, FROM THE STANDPOINT THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE AN AGREEMENT THAT THEY CAN USE THE FIELD AND WE NEED TO UPHOLD OUR END OF THE AGREEMENT. AND IF IT'S GOING TO BE DISRUPTED BY A SPECIAL EVENT, PERHAPS WE NEED TO HAVE A LINE ITEM FEE ON ANY SPECIAL EVENT THAT GOES TO THE SOFTBALL LEAGUE. WHEN THE SOFTBALL LEAGUE CAN'T PLAY ON THE FIELD THAT WE'VE TOLD THEM THEY CAN PLAY ON. SO WE SAY TO A SPECIAL EVENT, YEAH, YOU CAN HAVE IT ON THIS DAY. YOU'RE BY THE WAY, YOU'RE YOU'RE DISRUPTING OUR SOFTBALL LEAGUE. IT'S GOING TO COST YOU AN EXTRA 500 BUCKS, WHATEVER THAT WHATEVER THAT NUMBER MIGHT BE. BUT LET'S, LET'S, LET'S START TO, TO COMPENSATE THE LEAGUE AND ACTUALLY HELP THEM PERHAPS WHITTLE DOWN THAT, THAT DEBT WITH PEOPLE THAT WANT TO HAVE THOSE SPECIAL EVENTS AND THEY'RE GOING TO INTERRUPT A LONG STANDING SOFTBALL LEAGUE UNLESS LET'S TELL THEM THEY HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT. I DON'T SEE WHY THEY SHOULD HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT. OR THEY CAN MOVE TODAY. OKAY. WE DON'T WANT TO PAY THE $500 THIS WILL HAVE ON A DIFFERENT DAY. WE'RE NOT GOING TO DISRUPT THE SOFTBALL LEAGUE, WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE. BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THAT WE CAN HELP. WE CAN HELP THE LEAGUE AND ALSO UPHOLD OUR END ON ON AN AGREEMENT THAT WE'VE MADE WITH THE LEAGUE BY HELPING THEM PAY DOWN THIS DEBT, BY CHARGING A LINE ITEM FEE FOR ANYBODY THAT WANTS TO DISRUPT THEIR LEAGUE. JUST FOOD FOR THOUGHT, BUT I YEAH, I WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS. I WOULD ALSO GUESS THAT IT WAS ONLY 3000 ANNUALLY FOR THE LAST 25 YEARS, BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE MAYBE THAT SOME YEARS WE'RE NOT PAID ANYTHING BECAUSE LEAGUE GOT THEY WERE DISRUPTED A LITTLE BIT FROM LEADERSHIP AND EVERYTHING ELSE. SO AGAIN, IT'S PROBABLY SKEWS THE NUMBERS A LITTLE BIT. YOU KNOW, THEY PROBABLY, YOU KNOW, 3000 IS PROBABLY ON THE LOW END OF WHAT THEY'RE CAPABLE OF DOING. AND AGAIN IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU GUYS HAVE HAD THESE DISCUSSIONS AND YOU'VE GOT IT FIGURED OUT FROM AN OPTION ONE STANDPOINT. BUT AGAIN IT'S IMPORTANT THAT YOU KNOW THAT TO GET PAID. OH, AND ALSO I WOULD ADD THAT SINCE THE MAYOR HAS HAS TAKEN RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DEBT, WHEN SHE AGREED UPON IT 25 YEARS AGO TO MAKE SURE THEY'VE GOT HER EMAIL ADDRESS WHEN THEY START FUNDRAISING. EXACTLY. SO YEAH, I'M IN STRONG SUPPORT OF THIS. WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE WELL ON YOUR WAY TO FIGURING OUT HOW TO GET IT DONE. AND AGAIN, JUST A COUPLE OF IDEAS TO HELP HELP OFFSET SOME OF THAT COST AND DISRUPTION. THANK YOU. I HAVE PETRANOFF. AND THEN YES, IN TERMS OF THE SOFTBALL LEAGUES, ARE THEY FULLY LIQUIDATED COSTS OR ARE THERE SOME COSTS THAT ARE INHERENT IN THIS FIELD AND IN THIS LEAGUE THAT ARE BORNE BY CITY TAXPAYERS? YEAH. WELL, ALL OF YOUR PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES, THEY'RE NOT USED 100% OF THE TIME. AND THEY'RE NOT A BREAK EVEN SCENARIO. THERE'S A COST, A REASONABLE COST RECOVERY ASPECT THAT WAS IN THE PREEXISTING CONTRACTS AND IS IN THIS ONE, I THINK, TO CHAD'S POINT, IS THE OBLIGATION WAS ACCEPTED BY COUNCIL. SO THEY'RE TRYING TO HONOR THAT, MAKE YOU AWARE OF IT. AND AND PUT IT IN POSITION, AS DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO HOLD THAT RESOLUTION TO ITS PURPOSE EXCEPT, YOU KNOW, MAKE REQUIRING PAYMENT AND THEN ALSO SETTING THE STAGE FOR THERE TO BE SOME REASONABLE INCREASES, GIVEN THAT IT WAS THE SAME FEE FOR A PERIOD OF TIME. SO TO SHORT ANSWER IS TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. THEY'RE NOT KNOW. EVERY PARK FACILITY HAS TAXPAYER DOLLARS CONTRIBUTING IN ONE MANNER OR ANOTHER. THIS IS JUST OFFSETTING A PORTION OF THE COST. OKAY, THEN. AND GIVEN AND GIVEN THAT, YOU KNOW, WOULD IT BE THE JUST AN IDEA SINCE WHAT IS IT? DID YOU SAY 14% OF THE OF THE KIDS THAT ARE PARTICIPATING LIVE IN THE CITY? THAT NOT TO DOUBLE DIP ON RESIDENTIAL TAXES, COULD WE DO SOME VALUE PROPOSITION BEING A CITY RESIDENT AND MAKE THEIR FEE LESS OR NOT HAVE A FEE FOR KIDS THAT LIVE IN THE CITY? I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD, YOU KNOW, BE A SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE, BUT I THINK THAT'S TALKING ABOUT WHAT THEIR FEE STRUCTURE IS AS OPPOSED TO WHAT THEY WE'RE CHARGING THEM. SO IF YOU I GUESS IF YOU INTRODUCE THAT, THEY WOULD HAVE TO DETERMINE THE EASE TO WHICH THEY WOULD BE ADJUSTING THEIR, THEIR PREMIUMS OR NOT. OUR, OUR STAFF COULDN'T SPEAK TO HOW THEIR CHARGE FOR THE INDIVIDUAL REGISTRATION AND HOW THE MONEY COMES BACK IN. SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY. THANK YOU. YEAH. YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, THAT I JUST AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT A WAY NOT TO DOUBLE DIP AND TO CREATE A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY LIVE IN THE CITY THAT ARE SUBSIDIZING THESE PARKS ON A REGULAR BASIS. THE OTHER PIECE THAT I CAN'T HELP BUT THINK IS WE NEED TO THINK THROUGH IF IF WE HAVE SPECIAL EVENTS, BOOTING OUT THE SOFTBALL LEAGUES, I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ON WHAT OUR FUNNEL IS, ON PRIORITIES, ON WHAT WE WANT TO HAVE, ON USING OUR PARKS, BECAUSE THAT IS, AND WE NEED TO

[01:05:05]

BE MERCILESS ABOUT IT. AND EVERYONE IS WORTHY AND EVERYONE HAS STRONG ARGUMENTS FOR IT.

BUT I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE THOSE HARD DISCUSSIONS BECAUSE WHAT WAS IT, 37 TIMES? THAT'S A LOT. AND, YOU KNOW, I CAN'T HELP BUT THINK, WELL, IS THERE ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE LOCATION LIKE COULD, COULD THEY BE PERMANENTLY AT FLEISHMAN OR IS THAT JUST NOT A POSSIBILITY? SO IT'S TOUGH BECAUSE WE HAVE A BASEBALL LEAGUE THERE. NOW AS I SAID WE'VE PREPARED ONE OF THE FIELDS. SO IF WE IN THE CASE WE HAVE TO MOVE THEM THAT THEY HAVE A PLACE THAT THEY CAN GO, BECAUSE WHAT WE DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE IS, OKAY, YOU GOT TO MOVE, BUT OR YOU CAN'T PLAY THIS WEEKEND BECAUSE OF THE SPECIAL EVENT, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANYWHERE FOR YOU TO GO. SO WE'VE MADE THAT OPPORTUNITY AND THEY'VE UTILIZED THAT. BUT AGAIN, I'M GOD HAS BEEN HERE FOR FOUR YEARS. THAT FIELD HAS A LOT MORE HISTORY THAN WHAT WHAT I DO HERE. SO I THINK THERE'S A BENEFIT TO HAVING THE FIELD HERE. AND THAT'S KIND OF BEEN MY STANCE SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE IS IF WE GOT A FIELD, WE USE IT AS A FIELD. IF WE WANT A SPECIAL EVENT VENUE WE USE, THEN WE CREATE A SPECIAL EVENT VENUE. BUT ANYTIME THAT YOU MIX THE TWO SOME, SOMEBODY'S GOING TO BE IMPACTED. AND UNFORTUNATELY THE THE LEAGUE IS THE ONE THAT SEEMS TO BE GETTING IMPACTED BY THAT. AND MY SUGGESTION IS THAT WE THAT WE RELOOK AT WHERE OUR FIELDS ARE AND SEE IF, YOU KNOW, WE YOU MADE A TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION. CAN THAT BE A PERMANENT ACCOMMODATION. SO WE'RE NOT HAVING THESE FOLKS SCATTER 37 TIMES TO HAVE A AND GET IT ALL OUT TO THE PARENTS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE AT FLEISHMAN AND NOT AT CAMBIER.

YEAH. AND IT IS IT IS SEMI PERMANENT. BUT THEY ALSO WE LOOK AT IT AS ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO EXPAND. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW YOU'VE GOT THEY HAVE NO WAY TO EXPAND ON WITH ONE FIELD. SO IF THEY GROW AND YOU'VE GOT TEAMS THAT ARE PRACTICING AND AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE USE OF MULTIPLE FIELDS, THEN AT LEAST WE HAVE THAT AS AN OPTION. BUT AGAIN WE CAN'T GO TOO MUCH BECAUSE THEN WE START PUSHING THE LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL OUT AS WELL. SO THERE'S THERE'S KIND OF A BALANCE THAT WE HAVE TO GO. AND OUR TEAM HAS BEEN EXTREMELY WELL WITH SCHEDULING, BUT WE'RE TAKING IT TO THE MAX THAT WE CAN WITH THAT FIELD THAT WE CAN'T REALLY IF WE PUT THEM PERMANENTLY OVER THERE AND NOT IN CAMBIER PARK, WE'RE GOING TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE OTHER LEAGUES AT FLEISHMAN PARK. OKAY. THEN I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, I WOULD LIKE TO GET CONSENSUS THAT WE HAVE A MEETING ABOUT WHAT OUR PRIORITIES ARE OR RECOMMENDATION ON WHAT WHAT OUR PRIORITIES ARE ON ALL OF THESE EVENTS IN CAMBIER AND MAYBE EVEN AT FLEISHMAN, AND HOW WE WOULD ADDRESS THAT. OF THE 37 GAMES THAT ARE BEING PUSHED, HOW MANY? WHAT IS THE DENOMINATOR? HOW MANY TOTAL GAMES ARE THERE? AND YOU'RE GONNA MAKE ME COUNT? I'D HAVE TO LOOK IT UP. IT'S A I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF GAMES THEY PLAY 28 WEEKS AND SO THAT'S ARE THEY PLAY TO HOLD THEIR LEAGUE 28 WEEKS. SO IT'S I MEAN IT'S PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL. I'D HAVE TO COUNT IT. OKAY. I'M JUST CURIOUS ON THE ON THE PERCENTAGE OF TIME I GOT DAVID MICHAEL I'LL LET HIM INTRODUCE.

SO DAVID MICHAEL PARKS MANAGER I JUST GOT THE SCHEDULE IN FRONT OF US. IT'S ACTUALLY ONLY SIX WEEKENDS WHERE WE DON'T ALLOW NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL TO USE CAMBIER PARK THIS COMING SEASON, SO IT'S ONLY SIX WEEKENDS THE REST OF THE TIME, LIKE THE MAYOR SAID, WE DO HAVE OTHER SPECIAL EVENTS, BUT WE STILL DO ALLOW THEM TO USE IT SO THEY COULD HAVE THE GAME, THEN GO TO THE SPECIAL EVENT, GO TO A SMALLER ART SHOW. IT'S JUST SIX WEEKENDS WHERE WE HAVE THE LARGE SCALE EVENTS THAT WE DON'T LET THEM ACTUALLY USE THAT FACILITY. AND THEN, LIKE CHAD SAID, WE DO ALLOW THEM ON THAT SATURDAYS, USUALLY WHEN THEY HAVE THEIR GAMES TO GO TO FLEISCHMANN PARK, WE DID SKIN THE FIELD. WE TRY TO MAKE IT AS BEST WE CAN, ACCOMMODATING FOR THEM AT FLEISCHMANN PARK SO THEY CAN WHEN THEY CAN'T USE CAMBIER PARK, WE DO ACCOMMODATE AND ALLOW THEM TO USE FLEISCHMANN PARK IN THOSE TIMES OF NEEDS. OKAY, SIX SEEMS A LOT MORE REASONABLE. AND SOME OF THOSE DATES THAT CHAD MENTIONED, THOSE WERE JUST WHEN OTHER SPECIAL EVENTS ARE GOING ON IN THE PARK. OKAY. AND THIS IS WE'VE REALLY TRIED TO, LIKE CHAD SAID, MAKE IT A SOFTBALL FIELD AND SEPARATE SPECIAL EVENTS. SO THIS IS THE BEST THAT WE HAVE. IN THE PAST IT HAS BEEN WAY WORSE. BUT THIS COMING SEASON, FOR THE SPRING, WE'VE REALLY TRIED TO LIMIT IT DOWN AND THE REALLY THE ONLY TIME THEY CAN'T USE IT DURING THE WEEK IS WHEN WE HAVE CARS ON FIFTH ON THE FIELD, SO THE REST OF THE TIME THEY CAN USE IT ALL DURING THE WEEK. OKAY, SO IF I COULD JUST TO CLARIFY. SO ONE SECOND I'M JUST ON THIS, IF I COULD EXCUSE ME, COUNCILWOMAN PETRA, I JUST CLARIFYING QUESTION. SO SIX OUT OF 28 WEEKENDS, THERE'S A PROBLEM. THAT'S CORRECT. AND CAN BEER COULD NOT BE USED.

THAT'S CORRECTLY. OKAY, OKAY. I JUST WANT TO BE SURE I UNDERSTOOD. OKAY. THANK YOU.

[01:10:01]

AND MY FINAL COMMENT IS I'D LIKE COUNCIL MEMBER BARTON'S IDEA ON RAISING, YOU KNOW, HAVING A FEE IN THERE SINCE THEY IF OUR FIRST COMMITMENT AND OUR FIRST PRIORITY IS GOING TO BE THE SOFTBALL FIELDS AND NOT THE SPECIAL EVENTS THAT THEY PAY, PAY A PENALTY THAT GOES INTO THE SOFTBALL LEAGUE AND HELPS THEM RAISE SOME MONEY TO LIQUIDATE THAT EXPENSE.

ANOTHER BRILLIANT IDEA. I WOULD JUST I THINK IF YOU I'M SORRY. I THINK THAT'S A SLIPPERY SLOPE.

YOU KNOW, LOOK AND I'M GOING TO JOIN A COUPLE CONVERSATIONS. THE MAYOR SAID IF YOU MAKE AN OBLIGATION, YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. YOU KNOW, THIS IS A PARK FACILITY. IF YOU DECIDED YOU WANTED TO ASSIST THEM WITH OPERATIONS OR WHATEVER, THEN MAKE THAT DECISION. DON'T INCREASE IT TO $4 OR DON'T INCREASE IT TO $5. I MEAN, THINK ABOUT WHAT WE DID. WE HAD PEOPLE THAT SAID WE WANT TO RAISE MONEY FOR THE DOG PARK. THE DOG PARK GETS PAID FOR, WE HAVE AN OPERATIONAL COST AND WE JUST SAY, NO, IT'S WORTH IT FOR US. IT'S OPERATIONS WITHIN OUR FACILITY. SO ONE COUNCIL OBLIGATED AND SAID PUT A FEE IN IF IT DOESN'T PAY FOR ITSELF.

IN THE SAME TOKEN, YOU HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT IN YOUR FINANCIAL ABILITY, AND IT'S ALREADY SUBSIDIZED BY TAXPAYERS. BUT TO TURN AROUND AND SAY, I WANT TO CHARGE A FEE FOR THIS, TO OFFSET THAT, I JUST I WE MAKE A DECISION ON THE QUANTITY AND SIZE OF EVENTS.

IF IT PREVENTS, IT PREVENTS OUR OWN ADMINISTRATIVE CONFLICT OF CONFLICTING CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS. THEN WE EITHER NEED TO ALTER ONE OR THE OTHER OR ABSORB THOSE COSTS WITHIN OUR OPERATIONS. THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD SAY, BECAUSE IT'S A SLIPPERY SLOPE. WHEN YOU START TO DO THAT. THAT'S I WOULD JUST CAUTION THAT. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND COUNCIL MEMBER PETRANOFF, I THINK YOU MADE A REQUEST THAT WE LOOK AT OUR PRIORITIES, AND I THINK WE ARE DOING THAT AND OUR UP AND COMING SPECIAL EVENTS DISCUSSION. IS IT ABOUT THIS OR BECAUSE I HAVE AND THEN OKAY THANK YOU. COUNCIL ARE YOU COMPLETE COMPLETE. THANK YOU THANK YOU. YEAH I SUPPORT 100% WHAT COUNCILWOMAN PETRANOFF IS SAYING. YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO ESTABLISH OUR PRIORITIES HERE. WE'VE TALKED A LOT ABOUT WHAT THESE PARKS ARE FOR. I THINK WE'VE CALLED INTO QUESTION MANY TIMES EXACTLY WHETHER OR NOT SPECIAL EVENTS IS WHAT WOULD WE WANT TO SUPPORT IN OUR PARKS, OR DO WE WANT TO SUPPORT THE MEMORIES THAT YOU ALL HAVE TALKED ABOUT TODAY? AND LOOKING AT THOSE GREAT KIDS OUT THERE, YOU KNOW, 20, 30 YEARS FROM NOW, THEY'RE GOING TO BE HAVING THE SAME CONVERSATION IF WE GIVE THEM THE OPPORTUNITY. SO I THINK THAT'S I THINK THERE'S A BIGGER CONVERSATION HERE HAVING TO DO WITH SPECIAL EVENTS.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU. KRAMER. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. YOU GUYS LOOK GREAT. YEAH. SO SORRY YOU HAD TO SIT HERE SO LONG. THE. I HAVE A QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WOULD BE FOR CHAD OR NAPLES. SOFTBALL. WE'RE IMPROVEMENTS MADE. DID DID THE LEAGUE THROUGH THE YEARS MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FIELD THAT WEREN'T PART OF AN AGREEMENT THAT THEY DID ON THEIR OWN, BUT MAYBE WERE NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS? CHRIS MARTIN KURTZ PRESIDENT, NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL. I'M SORRY, WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? DID YOU ALL MAKE IMPROVEMENTS? NOT NECESSARILY UNDER YOUR LEADERSHIP, BUT THROUGH THESE DURING THESE YEARS WHEN THE $60,000, WHATEVER THAT AGREEMENT WAS? BUT WERE THERE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS MADE ABOVE AND BEYOND THAT, WHETHER THEY'RE WINDSCREENS OR BATTING CAGES OR WHATEVER? DID YOU ALL MAKE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FACILITY? I CAN'T SPEAK TO WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE MY MY TENURE, BUT I KNOW SINCE WE'VE BEEN THERE, WE'VE WE'VE HAVE MADE OUR OWN IMPROVEMENTS. WE'VE REDONE THE BATTING CAGES, WE'VE ADDED BACKSTOP PAD, AND WE'VE DONE A LOT. WE'VE, YOU KNOW, REDONE THE EQUIPMENT. SO BALLPARK ME HOW MUCH THAT COST. I'M SORRY. WHAT'S THAT BALLPARK ME HOW MUCH THAT COST? BATTING CAGES WAS AROUND $3,000. THE BACKSTOP PAD WAS AROUND $1,000.

IT'S JUST 1000 HERE, 500 HERE. OKAY, SO SMALL IMPROVEMENTS, NOTHING TO THE SCALE OF DOING THE FENCING AND THE LIGHTING WHICH WAS DONE, WHICH WE WE REALLY WE WE HAVE THE SCOREBOARD COMING UP WHICH WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT. SO IT IS IN OUR INTEREST TO KEEP THE PARK VITAL AND, AND AND, AND LOOK REALLY NICE AND TO, TO BLEND IN WITH THE REST OF THE COMMUNITY. OKAY. THANKS. NOW, I THINK I DON'T WANT TO CHERRY PICK THE NUMBER OF HOW MANY WHAT PERCENT CITY FOLKS DO THE SOFTBALL THING. IT'S 14, APPROXIMATELY 14. BUT THAT CAN FLUCTUATE. WHAT PERCENT OF CITY FOLKS PARTICIPATE. OF THE ALL THE TOTAL PARTICIPANTS, WHAT PERCENT WOULD BE CITY RESIDENTS FOR CARS ON FIFTH BEFORE OUR BEACHES? FOR EVERY ART SHOW? I'LL BET IT AIN'T MORE THAN 14. I COULDN'T GUESS, BUT YEAH, FOR THE FARMERS MARKET FOR THE DOG

[01:15:07]

PARK. JUST ASKING. SO THAT DOESN'T SEEM VERY RELEVANT TO ME. BUT I'LL TELL YOU, I KNOW THAT THAT ROBERT MURRAY IS GETTING INVOLVED. MICHAEL MORRIS AND THOSE GUYS ARE LEGENDS. AND AND UNTIL GOD TAKES ROBERT AMORY, HE IS THE THE ROCK THAT THE WAVES BREAK ON AND AND HE'S GOT HE'S DEAD SET ON THIS. I DID THE MATH. GREAT MINDS BURN 500 BUCKS IF IT WAS THE 37 NUMBER. SO FOR YEARS, IF YOU CHARGE 500 BUCKS EXTRA, THAT WOULD PAY THE DEBT COMPLETELY. 250 OVER EIGHT, OBVIOUSLY, BUT NOW WE'RE SAYING IT'S ONLY SIX EVENTS THAT CREATE THAT CONUNDRUM. SO NOW THAT WOULD EXPAND THE TIME ON THAT. BUT I'M HEARING WHAT OUR CITY MANAGER'S SAYING. AND I'M SAYING IF WE CAN MAKE SPACE FOR DOGS AND ERASE WHATEVER THAT OBLIGATION WAS, WE CAN SURE MAKE SPACE FOR KIDS IN THE SOFTBALL FIELD. LIKE THAT ISN'T EVEN A THING FOR ME. SO I'M ALL FOR JUST DOING THAT. AND BY WHATEVER MECHANISM WE NEED OVER HOW MANY YEARS WE NEED, THERE'S A THERE'S A THERE'S A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN, THEY'VE GOT NEW MOMENTUM. THIS THING THEY'RE DOING WITH JACKIE TRAIN AND ALL THOSE ALL STARS THAT'S COMING UP IS A BIG DEAL. IT'D BE A IT'S A BIG DEAL LIKE FOR THE SOUTHEAST UNITED STATES.

LIKE, THESE ARE SUPERSTAR GIRLS COMING BACK AND GIVING BACK TO THE COMMUNITY, AND AND THAT'S THAT'S A REALLY COOL EVENT. AND THAT'S JUST THE START OF OF WHAT THIS WAS. AND FOR THOSE THAT WEREN'T HERE, THIS WAS LIKE WE WERE NATIONAL CHAMPIONS REPEATEDLY ON NATIONAL TELEVISION, REPEATEDLY LIKE THIS WAS A BIG DEAL. AND NOT I'M TALKING ABOUT FOLKS THAT HAD NO KIDS AT ALL INVOLVED EVER. YOU WALK. THE PLACE IS PACKED. THAT'S WHY THEY NEEDED THE BLEACHERS, Y'ALL. THIS WASN'T LIKE IN A VACUUM. WHERE? WELL, LET'S JUST PUT A BUNCH OF BLEACHERS UP. AND SO IN THAT VEIN, KNOWING THE POSSIBILITY AND KNOWING HOW IT IMPACTS KIDS AND FAMILIES FOR GENERATIONS, I WANT TO FIND A WAY TO TO TO LET US DO IT. LIKE I SAID, IF WE CAN DO IT FOR DOGS, WE CAN DO IT FOR KIDS IN OUR COMMUNITY. SO JUST TO ADD TO THAT, GARY, YOU CAN CALL THAT LINE ITEM EXPENSE ANYTHING YOU WANT. SO IF YOU WANT TO GET CREATIVE WITH THAT AND SO THAT IT FITS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WHAT YOU THINK WOULD BE AN ACCEPTABLE LINE ITEM FEE, YOU CAN CALL IT BURN BARTON'S FEE, YOU KNOW, SO WHATEVER YOU THINK IS GOING TO IS GOING TO FLY FROM FROM AN ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE IS FINE WITH ME. SO I THANK YOU. THAT WAS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS TRYING TO SAY. I DO WANT TO LET MR. KURTZ SPEAK, BUT I THINK I WANT TO HEAR MORE ABOUT THE EVENT YOU'RE SPEAKING ABOUT. WE ARE CELEBRATING 250 YEARS OF OUR COUNTRY IN JULY. I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A BIG FUNDRAISER AND HOT DOGS AND HAMBURGERS AND BRING BACK THOSE OLD SUPPORTERS AND LET THEM LET EVERY BOY AND GIRL, WHETHER IT'S AT FLESHMAN OR WHETHER IT'S HERE, KNOW THAT THAT'S OUR PRIORITY IS OUR FUTURE AND OUR AND OUR GIRLS AND OUR BOYS THAT ARE GOING TO BE FUTURE LEADERS. SO COULD I JUST HAVE THAT WHOLE GROUP OF SOFTBALL PLAYERS AND THOSE THAT COME AND STAND BEHIND YOU AND I'LL GIVE YOU, DON'T BE SHY.

CAN'T BE SHY. YOU'RE ON THAT FIELD. YOU'VE BEEN HERE ALL MORNING LONG. IF YOU'LL JUST COME AND STAND BEHIND HIM. THERE ARE SOME DEDICATED GIRLS. MR. KURTZ, IF YOU'D LIKE TO HAVE YOUR PUBLIC SPEAKING TIME. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF. MY NAME IS MARTIN KURTZ. I'M THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL POSITION I'VE HELD SINCE 2023. I WAS THE DAD WHO ANSWERED THE WE NEED A T-BALL COACH EMAIL IN THE FALL OF 2020, AND I'M HAPPY TO REPRESENT THIS ORGANIZATION TODAY, AN ORGANIZATION WITH A VERY RICH HISTORY OF CHAMPIONS AND A LEGACY OF DEVELOPING GIRLS AND YOUNG WOMEN THROUGH THE SPORT OF SOFTBALL. TODAY, I'M JOINED BY SOME PLAYERS AND PARENTS WHO CARE DEEPLY ABOUT THIS ORGANIZATION. MY THREE DAUGHTERS ARE HERE WHO ARE ALSO WHO ARE CURRENTLY PLAYING IN THE PROGRAM, AND I WORK HERE RIGHT IN THE CITY. LIKE MANY PARENTS I REPRESENT, MY ONLY AGENDA IS MAKING SURE THIS LEAGUE STAYS STRONG SO THAT MY GIRLS AND ALL OF OUR GIRLS CAN DEVELOP ATHLETIC SKILLS, CONFIDENCE AND LIFE LESSONS THAT ONLY TEAM SPORTS CAN CAN TEACH. I WANT TO COMMEND DIRECTOR MERRITT AND HIS STAFF. IN THE PAST THREE YEARS, WE HAVE BUILT A COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIP. THEY ARE TRUE PROFESSIONALS IN THEIR SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY, AND THEY DO CARE DEEPLY ABOUT YOUTH SPORTS, AND WE'RE VERY LUCKY TO HAVE THEM ON BEHALF OF OUR BOARD AND FAMILIES. NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL FULLY SUPPORTS THE PROPOSED USAGE FEES AND THE PER PLAYER FEE STRUCTURE BEING DISCUSSED TODAY. WE BELIEVE THEY'RE FAIR

[01:20:06]

AND WILL HELP ENSURE THE LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF GIRLS SOFTBALL IN NAPLES. WE'RE ALSO FULLY COMMITTED TO RESOLVING THE OUTSTANDING BALANCES FROM PRIOR AGREEMENTS. WE DO TAKE THAT RESPONSIBILITY SERIOUSLY, AND WE'RE ALREADY TAKING CONCRETE STEPS TO RESOLVE THIS BY THE END OF THE NEW TERM. I WILL SAY THAT RESOLVING THE BALANCE CAN'T BE DONE JUST THROUGH PARTICIPANT FEES. WE DO NEED SUPPORT OF CURRENT MEMBERS, ALUMNI AND COMMUNITY LEADERS.

COACH KRAMER COUNCIL. COUNCIL MEMBER KRAMER MENTIONED OUR DECEMBER 21ST COACH ROBERT AMORY IS IS BRINGING BACK SOME OF HIS PAST CHAMPIONS. WE'RE GOING TO DO A CAMP FOR GIRLS AGES 8 TO 11 RIGHT HERE AT CAMBIER PARK. WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THAT. ALL THE PROCEEDS ARE GOING TO GO TOWARDS THIS BALANCE NEXT SUMMER AND EVERY SUMMER GOING FORWARD, WE'RE GOING TO HOST A WEEK LONG CAMP AT CAMBIER PARK, WHICH WILL GO TOWARDS THE BALANCE, AND WE'RE HAPPY ABOUT THAT. WE ALSO, MAYOR HEITMAN MENTIONED STARTING A FUNDRAISER TOMORROW. WE ACTUALLY HAVE ONE TODAY. WE'VE INITIATED A CROWDFUNDING CAMPAIGN TO INVOLVE ALUMNI FOR A WALL OF CHAMPIONS CAMPAIGN. WE'LL PERMANENTLY HONOR EACH OF NAPLES 18 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP SOFTBALL TEAMS, DISPLAYING THE TEAM NAME, CHAMPIONSHIP YEAR, AND FULL ROSTER OF PLAYERS AND COACHES ON A HIGH QUALITY BANNER. WE ALSO HAVE A CAMPAIGN TARGETING OUR CURRENT MEMBERS TO COMPLIMENT THE FUNDS THAT WE'VE RAISED TO ERECT A NEW SCOREBOARD THAT ALSO REFLECTS OUR LONG TERM COMMITMENT TO THE PARKS VITALITY. THE SCOREBOARD ALSO RECOGNIZE THE PAST CHAMPIONS NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL.COM/CAMBIER PARK. YOU CAN LEARN EVERYTHING ABOUT IT. MY VISION IS SIMPLE TO BE A CONTINUED CONTINUE BEING A VALUED, SELF-SUFFICIENT PARTNER OF THE CITY WITH SHARED GOALS, ALL OF ALL WHILE PROVIDING THE VERY BEST RECREATIONAL GIRLS SOFTBALL OPPORTUNITIES FOR NAPLES KIDS. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE STATE OF OUR ORGANIZATION, OUR FUNDRAISING INITIATIVES, OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT'S ON YOUR MIND. THANK YOU. YES, KRAMER. ONE MORE. JUST ONE THOUGHT THAT FOR COUNCILWOMAN, WHEN I DID CAMPS FOR YEARS FOR THE CITY, WE DID HAVE A REDUCED FEE FOR CITY RESIDENTS. THAT WAS A THING. AND THEN IF YOU'RE OUT OF THE CITY, YOU PAID MORE.

THAT WAS. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY STILL DO THAT. I DON'T KNOW, BUT THAT'S HOW WE ALWAYS DID IT.

SUMMER CAMP. WE'LL DO THAT. YEAH. SUMMER CAMPS. SO I'M JUST SAYING I THINK IT'S POSSIBLE.

YEAH IT IS. I WOULD SAY THOUGH FOR THE SPORTS, I, I THINK WHEN WE SEPARATE CITY FROM COUNTY AND THOSE COUNTY KIDS NEED TO KNOW THAT THIS IS THEIR CITY ALSO TO ME. WELL, THE OTHER THING IS IF ANYBODY I, I GAVE I DIDN'T CHARGE ANYBODY THAT COULDN'T AFFORD IT. SO THAT WAS ALSO A THING. LIKE I JUST I JUST WROTE IT OFF. MADAM MAYOR, MAY I MAKE A SUGGESTION. JUST JUST MY RECOMMENDATION. I MEAN, BASED ON THE COMMITMENT THAT THEY MADE IN THE AGREEMENT OF THE TERMS, RATHER THAN MESS AROUND WITH THE ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION AS IT'S DEPICTED TO AUTHORIZE THE RESOLUTION AND THEN THE WHATEVER FUNDRAISER EVENTS THAT ARE THERE. I THINK I'VE HEARD COUNCIL AS A WHOLE AND SOME OF THE SUGGESTIONS AND THEN WE, YOU KNOW, MAYBE REEVALUATE IT IN THE BEFORE THE SUMMER BREAK AND SAY, IF WE WANT TO MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO RELINQUISH ANY PART OF THE OUTSTANDING DEBT, THAT WOULD JUST BE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRING IT TO BE PAID IN THE FIVE YEARS. SO IT'S SOMETHING WE CAN CONTINUE TO LOOK AT. BUT RATHER THAN TRY TO HASH THAT OUT, WHAT THAT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE TODAY, I THINK LET THESE THINGS UNFOLD. AND THEN WE CAN HAVE THAT PART OF THE CONVERSATION. GREAT. I, I APPRECIATE THAT RECOMMENDATION. AND CAN YOU ONCE AGAIN JUST SAY THE YOU HAVE AN EVENT COMING UP THE DATE. SO ON DECEMBER 21ST THIS MONTH, COACH ROBERT MURRAY IS GOING TO BRING BACK RYAN AND JACKIE AND A LOT OF HIS CHAMPIONS FROM THE 2006 NAPLES GIRLS SOFTBALL WORLD SERIES CHAMPION, AND ALSO THE 2008 NAPLES HIGH SCHOOL STATE CHAMPION TEAM. SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THAT. THAT'S GOING TO BE A FUN EVENT WITH A LARGE PARTICIPATION, AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A REALLY GOOD TIME. WHERE IS IT AT? IT'S RIGHT HERE AT CAMBRIDGE PARK. OKAY. AND THE TIME IT'S GOING TO BE IN THE AFTERNOON, I THINK IT'S 1 TO 5. SO I THINK THAT IF NO ONE'S OPPOSED TO THIS, THAT SHOULD BE ON OUR CALENDAR. AND ALSO I THINK THE SOFTBALL GAMES SHOULD BE ON OUR CALENDAR BECAUSE THEN THE COMMUNITY KNOWS WE'VE HAD A LOT OF REQUESTS FROM RESIDENTS TO TO POST THE CALENDAR. SO I THINK THAT'D BE REALLY WELL RECEIVED. AND I THINK YOU'RE AN ANGEL. NEW PRESIDENT. AND I CERTAINLY

[01:25:01]

APPRECIATE YOUR LEADERSHIP, MR. KURTZ, AND WHAT THE OTHER MOTHERS THAT ARE HERE TODAY, THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU'RE DOING. AND THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. THANK YOU. OKAY, COUNCIL, I THINK THAT WE HAVE A DIRECTION THAT THIS RESOLUTION GOES TOWARDS THAT MR. YOUNG SAID. WE CAN APPROVE AND MAKE AN AMENDMENT IF NECESSARY. I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW JUST FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY. I KNOW WE DISCUSSED IT YESTERDAY THAT YOU MADE CHANGES TO THIS THAT WERE JUST MORE LEGALLY SUFFICIENT. THERE AREN'T ANY OTHER MAJOR CHANGES THAT BESIDES THE ONES WE'VE DISCUSSED WITH THE FEES OR WITH THAT OUTSTANDING DEBT. NO, I THINK WHEN THE AGREEMENT WAS SENT TO ME, IT HAD BEEN QUITE SOME TIME SINCE IT HAD BEEN UPDATED. SO I JUST TOOK THE LIBERTY OF OF UPDATING THE TEMPLATE FOR ALL THE AGREEMENTS LIKE I DO WITH, YOU KNOW, RIGHT OF WAY, ETC. SO I DO BELIEVE IT'S MORE LEGALLY SUFFICIENT.

OBVIOUSLY MY PRIORITY IS INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE, BUT I WORKED WITH STAFF AND I THINK THESE ARE GOOD FOR THE NEXT FORESEEABLE FUTURE. OKAY. WELL THANK YOU, STAFF VICE MAYOR.

YEAH. FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY, DO YOU BELIEVE AFTER THE DISCUSSION TODAY IN THE RESOLUTION AS WRITTEN IN 13 A AND I BELIEVE WE'RE WE WOULD CONSIDER A MOTION TO APPROVE EACH OF THESE ON A STANDALONE BASIS. IS THAT CORRECT? YES. OKAY. AND BASED ON WHAT YOU HEARD IN THIS DISCUSSION, IS THERE ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES THAT WOULD NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MOTION? NO, I THINK THE MOTION WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AS IT READS. BUT TO MR. YOUNG'S POINT, I THINK HE'S ALREADY GOTTEN THE CONSENSUS HE NEEDS REGARDING THE PRIOR RESOLUTION. SO I THINK THAT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR TODAY'S PURPOSES. SO, MADAM MAYOR, WHENEVER IT'S APPROPRIATE, I'M READY TO THERE'S NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. I'LL AND YOU CAN MAKE THE MOTION. OKAY. I MOVE TO APPROVE 13 A THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NAPLES AND NAPLES. GIRLS SOFTBALL FOR THE USE OF CAMBIER PARK AND PARK FACILITIES. A MOTION BY VICE MAYOR. I HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BARTON. MADAM CLERK, PLEASE PULL THE COUNCIL. COUNCIL MEMBER. KRISEMAN. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BARTON. YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER. CRAMER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. PENNIMAN. YES. VICE MAYOR. HUTCHISON. YES. MAYOR. HEITMAN. ABSOLUTELY. YES. SO THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. AND GOOD LUCK WITH THE FUNDRAISING AND HOPE TO SEE YOU AT A GAME. AND, MAYOR, IF I MAY. YES. IS THAT APPROVING OPTION ONE, THE THAT PAYMENT SCHEDULE, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

MADAM MAYOR, FOR CLARIFICATION THAT THE RESPONSE IS YES. ON 13 A TO INCLUDE APPROVAL OF OPTION ONE, THE PAYMENT PLAN OR PAYMENT SCHEDULE. THANK YOU. AND THE SECOND STANZA. OKAY.

[13.B) A Resolution Approving a License Agreement Between the City of Naples and Greater Naples Little League, Inc. for the Use of Fleischmann Park Facilities to Conduct a Youth Baseball League at Fleischmann Park for a Three-Year Term with Two One-Year Extensions; Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the License Agreement; Providing for Scrivener’s Errors; and Providing an Effective Date. ]

THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. IT THAT TAKES US TO ITEM 13 B MR. MCCONNELL. YES.

THANK YOU MAYOR. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NAPLES AND GREATER NAPLES LITTLE LEAGUE, INC. FOR THE USE OF PARK FACILITIES TO CONDUCT A YOUTH BASEBALL LEAGUE AT FLEISCHMANN PARK FOR A THREE YEAR TERM WITH TWO ONE YEAR EXTENSIONS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LICENSE AGREEMENT, PROVIDING PRESCRIPTIONS ERRORS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. GOOD MORNING, CHAD MERRITT, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR. THIS IS KIND OF SAME CONCEPT AS FAR AS REDOING ANOTHER USE AGREEMENT FOR OUR LICENSE AGREEMENT. EXCUSE ME WITH THE BASEBALL LEAGUE, SAME FEE STRUCTURE WOULD APPLY TO THIS. SO I DON'T UNLESS YOU WANT ME TO GO BACK THROUGH THAT. IT'S STILL THE SAME THING. OPTION ONE WOULD APPLY TO THIS LEAGUE AS WELL. I WILL NOTE THAT THIS LEAGUE ALSO RUNS SEPTEMBER TO NOVEMBER FOR THE FALL LEAGUE, JANUARY TO MAY FOR THE SPRING LEAGUE. IT'S ABOUT AGAIN 28 WEEKS AND THE CITY SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 63,000 A YEAR BASED ON TWO AND A HALF FIELD USE. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE DONE SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO MAINTAIN THE FACILITIES. AND THE BATTING CAGE WAS ACTUALLY ONE OF THE MOST RECENT ITEMS IS WE'VE ALSO DONE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS, THESE FIELDS AS WELL. AND AS DAVID MICHAEL STATED, WE WENT IN AND ACTUALLY MADE ONE OF THE FIELDS WHERE IT COULD BE MULTI-USE, WHERE BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL COULD UTILIZE IT. SO IF WE NEEDED TO HAVE BASEBALL OR WE NEEDED TO HAVE SOFTBALL THERE, THEN WE COULD WE RECEIVE ABOUT 15,000 REVENUE BASED ON THE USER FEE AND THE BUILDING

[01:30:06]

FEE. ABOUT 47% OF THE PARTICIPANTS RESIDE IN THE CITY. AND I THINK THIS IS AGAIN, THIS WOULD RUN START JANUARY 1ST, AND WE WOULD CONTINUE TO UPDATE THAT WITH THE REST OF THE ATHLETIC FEES. THERE ARE NO OUTSTANDING BALANCES FROM THIS SIDE, AND I'M OPEN TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE THAT. OBVIOUSLY, WE AS I STATED BEFORE, OUR RECOMMENDATION FROM CSAB WAS GOING WITH OPTION ONE AND AS WELL AS STAFF. I WAS REMISS IN ASKING WERE THESE WAS THIS INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE LEAGUES PRIOR TO OUR APPROVAL? SO THEY'RE AWARE OF OF THIS? OH YEAH. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER PETRANOFF. YES. I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T HEAR THAT. WHAT PERCENT ARE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE CITY? 47% IN THE CITY. 47. OKAY, A MUCH HIGHER PERCENTAGE, YOU KNOW. THAT'S THAT. THAT GIVES ME A LITTLE BIT MORE COMFORT CONSIDERING WE ARE AN INDEPENDENT MUNICIPALITY AND. I WOULD RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE THAT SOME OF THESE EVENTS ARE 14% ARE CITY LIKE THE FARMER'S MARKET. IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN THERE, OKAY, OKAY. WELL ANYWAY, SO I'M GLAD THAT IT'S MORE THAN MORE THAN THAT. BUT IT'S I STILL STRUGGLE WITH SUBSIDIZING SOME OF THESE SOME OF THESE EVENTS. IT'S WHERE DO WE STOP AS TAXPAYERS? WE'RE GETTING A LOT OF HEAT ON THE OTHER SIDE TO ELIMINATE PROPERTY TAXES. SO WHAT HAPPENS THEN? I THINK WE GO TO THE COUNTY AND ASK FOR MORE. AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.

YES, BECAUSE IT TAKES IT TAKES CITY AND COUNTY TO TO RAISE CHILDREN. AND WE HAVE TRADITION HERE. AND I DON'T WANT TO SEE THIS TRADITION GO, I, I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU, BUT I THINK THAT IT NEEDS TO COME IN LOCKSTEP WITH AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. THANK YOU. I'LL BE NEXT ON MR. A MORE HAWKISH WITH FINANCES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. YES. VICE MAYOR IF APPROPRIATE I'M PREPARED TO MAKE A MOTION ON ITEM 13 B. I MOVE APPROVAL OF 13 B A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NAPLES AND THE GREATER NAPLES LITTLE LEAGUE, INC. FOR THE USE OF FLESHMAN PARK FACILITIES TO CONDUCT A YOUTH BASEBALL LEAGUE AT FLESHMAN PARK FOR THREE YEAR TERM AND TWO YEAR, ONE YEAR EXTENSIONS.

THIS IS WITHIN THIS ITEM ADOPTING OPTION ONE, AS WELL AS ADOPTING WHAT IS DESCRIBED AS THE NEW LICENSE AGREEMENT. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION BY VICE MAYOR AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BARTON. MADAM CLERK, PLEASE PULL THE COUNCIL. VICE MAYOR. HUTCHISON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. KRISEMAN. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. BARTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER.

CRAMER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. PETRANOFF. YES. MAYOR. HARTMAN. ABSOLUTELY. YES. AND I HOPE

[13.C) A Resolution Approving a License Agreement Between the City of Naples and Naples Gators, Inc. for the Use of Fleischmann Park Facilities to Conduct Youth Football League at Fleischmann Park for a Three-Year Term with Two One-Year Extensions; Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the License Agreement; Providing for Scrivener’s Errors; and Providing an Effective Date. ]

SOMEBODY BOUGHT THEM A NEW HOT DOG MACHINE WITH THAT. MOVING ON TO ITEM 13 C. THANK YOU.

MAYOR. RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NAPLES AND NAPLES GATORS, INC. FOR THE USE OF FLESHMAN PARK FACILITIES TO CONDUCT A YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE AT FLESHMAN PARK FOR A THREE YEAR TERM WITH TWO ONE YEAR EXTENSIONS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE LICENSE AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. YES. CHAD MERRITT, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR. AGAIN, THIS IS A LEAGUE, THE FOOTBALL LEAGUE, THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. NAPLES GATORS. THIS IS A 27 WEEK LEAGUE. THEY OPERATE FALL LEAGUE JULY TO NOVEMBER. SPRING LEAGUE FEBRUARY TO MAY. THEY DO EXCUSE ME. THEY DO USE A FIT. WE CALL IT ONE AND A HALF FIELDS BECAUSE IT'S A IT'S NOT A FULL FIELD BESIDE IT. THEY ALSO HAVE USE OF THE CONCESSION AREA, A LOCKER ROOM AREA AND A PRESS BOX AREA. SO THEY'RE BUILDING FEE IS A LITTLE BIT HIGHER THAN WHAT YOU SAW FROM THE PREVIOUS TWO LEAGUES. WE RECEIVE ABOUT 19,000 OF REVENUE FROM THIS WITH THE BUILDING FEE AS WELL AS USER FEES. ABOUT 5% OF THE PARTICIPANTS RESIDE IN THE CITY, AND THIS WOULD STILL BE OPTION ONE AS THE SAME FEE WOULD EXIST

[01:35:05]

WITHIN THIS. CSAB MADE THE RECOMMENDATION TO GO WITH OPTION ONE, ALONG WITH THE FIVE YEAR AGREEMENT, AND AS WELL AS STAFF RECOMMENDS GOING WITH OPTION ONE. AND THIS WOULD START ON JANUARY 1ST, 2026. NOW. MR. MAYOR, DID WE PAY TO REPLACE THE FOOTBALL FIELD TURF? WE HAD THE TURF PROJECT UNDERWAY AND DUE TO SOME, IF YOU REMEMBER WHEN WE BROUGHT THAT BACK TO YOU, WE HAD TO RESCIND THE RESOLUTION BECAUSE THE CONTRACTOR INCREASED THE FEE BY ALMOST HALF $1 MILLION ON THE PROJECT. SO WE HAD TO BACK OUT OF THAT OR NOT HAD TO WE DID BACK OUT OF THAT BECAUSE IT DIDN'T MAKE FINANCIAL SENSE, BECAUSE IT WE DIDN'T HAVE IT.

WE SAY IT THAT IT WASN'T. THAT PROJECT COULD HAVE BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY LESS IF WE BACKED OUT OF IT. SO IT IS IN A FUTURE CONVERSATION. BUT WE FELT THAT WE NEEDED TO HAVE THIS AGREEMENT UPDATED BEFORE WE HAD THAT CONVERSATION LATER ON. YEAH. SO WE WERE WILLING TO PAY TO REPLACE THAT SOD AT THAT FOOTBALL FIELD. YES, IT WAS GOING TO BE ARTIFICIAL TURF. SO IT WAS 1.2. AROUND 1.2, $1.3 MILLION IS WHAT WE WOULD HAVE BEEN PAYING. AND NOW TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER, THIS IS A LEAGUE THAT'S AN IMPORTANT LEAGUE, BUT IT'S ALSO A LEAGUE THAT IS DEFINITELY MAJORITY OF COUNTY PLAYERS. NOW I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO, YOU KNOW, WHO'S MORE IMPORTANT. BUT THE THING THAT CONCERNS ME ABOUT THESE. AGREEMENTS IS THAT WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF LOOKING AT OUR PARKS AND WHAT WE WANT THEM TO BE. SO IS FLESHMAN ONE OF THE PARKS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TO SEE WHAT WE WANT IN THE PARK IN THE FUTURE? IT WASN'T A PART OF THE SURVEY. YEAH. SO ALL OF THE PARKS WILL BE PART OF THAT NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHAT THE COMMUNITY IS WANTING IN TERMS OF RECREATIONAL NEEDS. SO IT WILL INCLUDE ALL OF THEM. AND SO IF WE DECIDE THAT WE'RE GOING TO RENEW THIS FOR THREE YEARS.

YEAH. WHAT'S THE TIME FRAME IN THE SURVEYS AND WHEN WE'RE GOING TO BE MAKING THE DECISION ON ON WHAT WE WANT OUR PARKS TO LOOK LIKE. SO THE MASTER PLAN WILL BE COMPLETE IN THE SUMMER OF 26. AND OBVIOUSLY IF IF IT GIVES RECOMMENDATIONS, THEN THERE HAS TO BE A DISCUSSION.

IF THERE'S CIP ITEMS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THAT, THEN YOU WOULD HAVE TO PUT IT INTO THE BUDGET PROPOSAL, WHICH IF WE USED 26 SUMMER OF 26, THAT WOULD MEAN THE SOONEST THAT IT WOULD COME IN FRONT OF YOU WOULD BE THE BUDGET YEAR OF THAT. WE WOULD DISCUSS IN THE SPRING OF 27, WHICH MEANS IT WOULD BE FY 28, WOULD BE AS SOON AS THAT YOU GO. SO THIS TERM WOULD GO 26. SO YEAR THREE WOULD MEAN 29. BUT EVEN IF YOU APPROVE A PROJECT OR YOU APPROVE SOMETHING, A MOVE TO GO TOWARDS SOMETHING, WE'VE GOT TO GO THROUGH A DESIGN. YOU'VE GOT TO GO THROUGH A BID PROCESS. SO I WOULD SAY THAT'S AT LEAST ANOTHER YEAR. SO THAT WOULD TAKE US THROUGH THE TERM OF THE FIRST THREE YEARS FOR SURE. I DISCUSSED THAT WITH THE CITY MANAGER, BUT I THOUGHT THE RECORD DESERVED THAT. YEAH. SO. JUST TELL ME ABOUT WE HIRED WHO TO DO THE SURVEY. WESSON AND SAMPSON IS CONSULTING GROUP AND THEY YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. IT'LL BE THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE SURVEYS THAT ARE GIVEN OUT. YES.

SO THEY BASED THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL OF THE INPUT THAT THEY RECEIVED THROUGH COMMUNITY AS WELL. AS THEY GO THROUGH STAFF INPUT, THEY GO THROUGH ELECTED OFFICIAL INPUT. THEY HAVE STAKEHOLDERS. IT'S A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL PROCESS THAT THEY GO THROUGH WHEN THEY DEVELOP THESE RECOMMENDATIONS AND WILL ALL BE BASED ON WHAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED FROM THAT FEEDBACK. AND OF COURSE, TRENDS AND, AND, AND WHERE WE STAND FROM A STANDPOINT OF WHAT WE OFFER. OKAY. THANK YOU. BECAUSE I. AND THEN I THINK WE NEED TO DISCUSS OUR POLICIES IN GENERAL ON MAINTENANCE AND REDOING FIELDS, BECAUSE IF WE WERE WILLING TO REDO THE FIELD FOR THE FOOTBALL FIELD, AND WE HAVE A LONG OUTSTANDING HISTORY WITH THE

[01:40:01]

SOFTBALL FIELD, SOME FAIRNESS AND CONSISTENCY MIGHT BE ORDERED. YEAH. WELL, I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT THERE HASN'T BEEN A WE'RE STILL PUTTING ATTENTION ON IT. WE HAVE REPLACED THE FENCE. WE'VE REPLACED THE LIGHTS, WE PUT THE WINDSCREEN UP. WE WENT IN AND COMPLETELY REDID THE WARNING TRACK, THE FIELD ITSELF. SO WE SPEND JUST AS MUCH TIME ON ON ALL OF THEM.

OUR JOB AND OUR GOAL IS TO MAINTAIN OUR FACILITIES TO THE HIGHEST EXPECTATION AS POSSIBLE.

THAT'LL BE SOMETHING THOUGH, THAT TOTAL COST OF WHAT? THAT I MEAN, LOOKING FORWARD, WE CAN TELL THESE THINGS, YOU KNOW, NEED TO BE LOOKED AT, WHICH I CAN TELL YOU'RE ALREADY DOING.

BUT JUST SO THAT WE HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE COST IS WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT OUR MASTER PLAN. OKAY. THANK YOU. I HAVE KRAMER AND THEN BARTON. SAME SIMILAR HISTORY.

NOT 18 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS, BUT CERTAINLY THE NAPLES GATORS WERE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS BACK IN THE DAY, OR NATIONAL CHAMPIONS, I SHOULD SAY. AND FOR THOSE THAT DON'T KNOW WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT LEE AGE GROUPS, SO YOU HAVE EVERYTHING FROM SIX USE EIGHT, SEVEN, EIGHT, NINE. EVERY AGE IS ANOTHER GROUP OF OF KIDS. AND I THINK SOMETIMES WE THINK THERE'S A LEAGUE. IT'S IT'S MIXED AND IT IS JUST A CERTAIN EXTENT. BUT IT'S VERY STRIATED.

ANTHONY PARK AND I'VE THOUGHT THIS FOREVER. I WAS I REMEMBER I WALKED IT WHENEVER THEY WERE REDOING THE SOD. I WASN'T ON COUNCIL OR ANYTHING, I JUST WE JUST USED THAT PARK AND I WAS WONDERING ABOUT WHAT PUTTING IN ARTIFICIAL TURF THERE. IS IT BIG? I DON'T THINK IT'S NOT BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE A WHOLE FOOTBALL FIELD, IS IT? IS IT? SO JUST A BRIEF HISTORY OF WHAT THAT HOW THAT CAME ABOUT. SO THE ORIGINAL PLAN WAS TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE MULTI-USE FIELDS, AND THEN IT GOT COMBINED. WHEN WE BROUGHT IT INTO HERE AS ONE, I'D HAVE TO DO THE MEASUREMENT AND WE MEASURED IT. IT WOULD FIT A FIELD CONFIRMED BY BY MY MAN, BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING TO JUST THINK ABOUT MOVING FORWARD. YOU COULD, IF YOU WANTED TO MOVE THE FOOTBALL VENUE. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT STANDS AND ALL THAT, HOW ALL THAT WOULD FIT, BUT I'M THINKING IT WOULD LOOK, WHEN I WALKED, I THOUGHT WE COULD DO IT HERE IF WE NEEDED TO. YEAH, THE PARKING'S A CHALLENGE THERE. THAT'S IS THE ISSUE I WAS GOING TO. THAT'S MY NEXT THING I KNOW PARKING WOULD BE. I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT WOULD WORK. YEAH. THE PARKING IS A CHALLENGE, YOU KNOW. AND THIS WAS AGAIN BEFORE ME. I KNOW WHEN THAT PARK WAS DEVELOPED, THERE WAS SOME FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY NOT PUTTING LEAGUES ON THE THE SPACE THERE. THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY PREVENT IF WE NEED TO HAVE PRACTICE SPACE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE PRACTICE, BECAUSE WE COULD HANDLE SOME OF THE TRAFFIC FOR THAT AND MORE THAN WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU HAVE PRACTICE, MOST KIDS ARE DROPPED OFF FOR PRACTICE AND PICKED UP. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'VE LOOKED AT. BUT WE WANTED TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AND ALSO GO THROUGH THIS MASTER PLAN PROCESS SO THAT WE COULD COME BACK AND EYES WIDE OPEN, HAVE THAT CONVERSATION. OKAY. IS IT OKAY FOR US TO PROCEED WITH HAVING PRACTICE AT THIS LOCATION? BECAUSE IT'S A BEAUTIFUL FIELD. WE MAINTAIN IT. WE'VE GOT A I MEAN, IT LOOKS PRISTINE. UNFORTUNATELY, WE'VE HAD TO RUN PEOPLE OFF FROM HITTING GOLF BALLS ON IT. AND WELL, THAT'S BECAUSE WHEN YOU PUT THAT GRASS ON THERE, THE TYPE YOU PUT ON, I WAS LIKE, I THINK IT'D BE GOOD. YEAH, YEAH, BUT IT'S GREAT GRASS. SO I JUST BRING THAT UP BECAUSE HISTORICALLY, WHETHER THE GATORS THERE, A LOT OF THEIR PARTICIPANTS WERE AT RIVER PARK. AND I ALWAYS THOUGHT, WELL, I USED TO DO CLINICS THERE AT THE FIELD, IF YOU REMEMBER, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE HERE OR NOT, BUT AT DIFFERENT TIMES IT'S HAD A SOFTBALL FIELD ON IT, BASEBALL FIELD ON IT, BACKSTOPS AND ALL THAT STUFF. SO I THINK THAT'S JUST AN UNDERUSED RESOURCE. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT OUR WHAT'S IN OUR, OUR QUEUE FOR FOR PARKS AND REC. AND I DO WANT TO I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THAT WE DO RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF THAT OF THE, OF THE NAPLES GATORS TO THE RIVER PARK COMMUNITY BECAUSE IT'S BEEN A BIG DEAL FOR A LONG TIME. YEAH. GREAT. BARTON, QUESTION FOR YOU.

I REALIZE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE NAPLES GATORS AGREEMENT HERE, BUT ARE THE FIELDS USED FOR OTHER LEAGUES? I KNOW I PLAYED IN FLAG FOOTBALL LEAGUE, SO I WAS ABOUT 42 AND IT WAS EVERYTHING TOOK PLACE. THERE ARE THOSE OTHER LEAGUES STILL PARTICIPATING AND USING THAT LOCATION. SO WE HAVE SOME LEAGUES IN THERE. WE'VE GOT WE RENT IT TO SOME TRAVEL TEAMS, BUT WE'VE KIND OF MADE THE STANCE THAT OUR, AT LEAST FROM MY SIDE AS A DIRECTOR, THAT OUR GOAL IS TO FIRST MAKE SURE THAT WE MEET THE NEEDS OF THE ACTUAL LEAGUE, THAT WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH, WHICH IN THIS CASE IS GREATER NAPLES BASEBALL AND THEN NAPLES SOFTBALL. SO EVERYBODY ELSE COMES SECOND WHEN WE PUT THEM IN THERE. BUT STAFF HAS BEEN ABLE TO GO ON AND DO SOME OTHER LEAGUES IN ADDITION TO OUTSIDE OF THE THAT AS WELL. AND I CAN YEAH, WE

[01:45:07]

HAVE SOCCER AND LACROSSE OVER ON THE BASEBALL AND AND OKAY THE WAX NOT BASEBALL. SORRY ON THE SOFTBALL THERE'S TOO MANY LEAGUES RUNNING AROUND. I'M AGAIN A BASEBALL PLAYER. SO IT'S STUCK IN MY HEAD ON THE FOOTBALL FIELD. AND THEN THAT LITTLE SIDE FIELD THAT'S THERE.

YEAH. SO WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, UTILIZATION OF THAT AREA OF THAT LOCATION, IT'S NOT JUST FOR NAPLES GATORS EITHER. THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER LEAGUES THAT ARE USING THAT FOOTBALL FIELD. AND LIKE I SAID, I KNOW I HAD I QUIT PLAYING FLAG FOOTBALL WHEN I COULDN'T GET THROUGH A SEASON WITHOUT PULLING A HAMSTRING. SO MY MY AGE PREVENTED ME FROM CONTINUING THAT. WELL, MANY OTHER THINGS, AGE AND SIZE PREVENTED ME FROM DOING THAT.

BUT NONETHELESS, MY POINT IS, YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S NOT JUST NAPLES GATORS OVER THERE WHO WHO NEED THAT FACILITY, BUT ALSO THAT WE'VE GOT OTHER LEAGUES THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN FLOURISHING USING THAT LOCATION AS WELL.

AND WE USE THEM FOR SUMMER CAMPS AS WELL. OPEN SPACE. WE WHEN IT'S AVAILABLE, THE PUBLIC.

I MEAN, EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE THE PUBLIC WILL GO OUT AND WANT TO THROW A FOOTBALL OR KICK A SOCCER BALL. YEAH, OKAY, GOOD. VICE MAYOR. THANK CHAD. AND APPN THE YOUR TEAM'S EFFORT ON FOR COUNCILMAN CRAMER ON THIS ONE. THIS THIS ITEM SPECIFICALLY CALLS OUT THE ORGANIZATION NAMED THE NAPLES GATORS. AND THERE'S BEEN DISCUSSION UP HERE ON THE DAIS ABOUT THE NAPLES GATORS AND THE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PARTICIPATION IN AGE GROUPS WITHIN NAPLES GATORS. BUT MY QUESTION IS THIS IS THERE A DOTTED LINE THAT YOU'VE BEEN ABLE TO IDENTIFY FROM PARTICIPANTS IN NAPLES GATORS TO NAPLES HIGH SCHOOL THAT AT ANY POINT IN TIME? I CAN'T SPEAK TO IT RIGHT NOW, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT HISTORICALLY THAT IS THE CASE. YEAH, THAT THAT'S JUST THANK GOODNESS. YEAH. VERY GOOD. SO COUNCIL IT'S IT'S IT'S THE PERCENTAGE OF COUNTY PARTICIPANTS ON THIS ONE. RIGHT. THE VERSUS CITY PARTICIPANTS. BUT IT HAS A IT HAS EXTENSIONS AND IMPACTS ON OUR EVEN OUR LOCAL HIGH SCHOOL. AND IT'S A PROGRAM I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE CONTINUED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND VICE MAYOR TO BURNS PART ABOUT THE PROGRAMING JUST FOR THAT AREA NAPLES. NAPLES GIRLS LACROSSE WAS KIND OF BORN THERE WITH FRANK AUDITORY. I MEAN HE'S HE COULD USE THE HIGH SCHOOL FIELD SOME BUT AND THEY THEY THAT'S A THAT WAS A MUST MUST NEED OR A MET NEED FOR NAPLES GIRLS LACROSSE AND MAYBE STILL BE I DON'T KNOW I DON'T FOLLOW IT ANYMORE. BUT TO USE THAT FACILITY ARE THEY STILL DOING THAT OR. NO. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH WE HAVE THE COLLIER COUNTY LACROSSE ASSOCIATION WHICH THEY DO HAVE SOME SOME FEMALE OR GIRL PARTICIPANTS IN IT. THEY UTILIZE OUR FACILITY ALL THE TIME. WE ALSO HAVE A KICKBALL LEAGUE THAT WE RUN ON SUNDAYS, AND WE ALSO HAVE OUR SOCCER LEAGUE THAT RUNS THROUGHOUT THE WEEK AS WELL WITH WITH OBVIOUSLY THE NAPLES GATORS AS OUR NUMBER ONE USER OF THE RECTANGLE FIELDS THERE AT FLEISCHMANN. THANK YOU. GOOD QUESTION. AND I THOUGHT THAT'S WHERE YOU WERE SCOUTING. I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED IT, VICE MAYOR. AND IT'S A GOOD THING. OKAY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR HAVE A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE 13 C A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NAPLES AND NAPLES GATORS FOR USE OF FLEISCHMANN PARK FOR YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE FOR THREE YEAR TERM WITH TWO ONE YEAR EXTENSIONS. MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTMANN AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PENMAN. MADAM CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE COUNCIL. COUNCIL MEMBER PENMAN. YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER CRAMER. YES. VICE MAYOR. HUTCHISON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. CHRISTMANN. YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER. BARTON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. PETRANOFF. YES. MAYOR. HEITMAN. YES. THANK YOU.

PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MR. MCCONNELL. ITEM 13. OH, WAIT. STAFF. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME TALK SPORTS IN THE COUNCIL MEETING. YES. AND AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, BEFORE 12,

[13.D) Executive Session regarding Naples Pride v. City of Naples, Naples City Council, Teresa Heitmann, Terry Hutchison, Raymond Christman, Beth Petrunoff, Bill Kramer, Linda Penniman, and Berne Barton, in their official capacities as City Council members; Naples Police Department; and Ciro Dominguez, in his official capacity as Naples Chief of Police, Case No. 2025-CV-00291-JES-KCD, United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division.]

RIGHT. THANK YOU. GOING TO ITEM 13 D. YES. THANK YOU MAYOR. SO PURSUANT TO 286 .011 SUBPARAGRAPH EIGHT, YOUR CITY ATTORNEY IS ANNOUNCING HIS REQUEST FOR AN EXECUTIVE

[01:50:03]

SESSION CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE PURPOSE OF SEEKING ADVICE CONCERNING ONE OF TWO THINGS EITHER SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS OR STRATEGY RELATED TO LITIGATION EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH LITIGATION, STYLED NAPLES PRIDE VERSUS CITY OF NAPLES, NAPLES CITY COUNCIL, TERESA HEITMANN, TERRY HUTCHINSON, RAYMOND CHRISTMANN, BETH PETRANOFF, BILL KRAMER, LINDA PENMAN, AND BERNARD BARTON IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, NAPLES POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CIRO DOMINGUEZ AND HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS NAPLES CHIEF OF POLICE. CASE NUMBER 2025 CV 00291-JESK, C D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, FORT MYERS DIVISION. ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2025, AT APPROXIMATELY 1:30 P.M. OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PREVIOUS EXECUTIVE SESSION, SCHEDULED AT 1230 IN THE CITY'S CONFERENCE ROOM ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS EXPECTED TO LAST APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR. THE ENTIRE SESSION SHALL BE RECORDED BY THE CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER. NO PORT OF A NO PORTION OF THE TRANSCRIPT WILL BE LEFT OFF THE RECORD. COURT REPORTERS NO SHALL BE FULLY TRANSCRIBED AND FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AFTER THE MEETING. AS YOU KNOW, CITY COUNCIL WILL TAKE NO ACTION DURING THE EXECUTIVE SESSION, BUT MAY TAKE ACTION ONCE WE RECONVENE IN THE PUBLIC.

FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS WILL BE PRESENT DURING THE EXECUTIVE SESSION. MAYOR TERESA HEITMANN, COUNCIL MEMBERS TERRY HUTCHISON, RICK KRISEMAN, BETH PETRANOFF, BILL KRAMER, LINDA PENMAN, BRIAN BARTON, CITY MANAGER GARY YOUNG, INSURANCE COUNCIL DAVID JORDAN, CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW MCCONNELL, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ANDREW DICKMAN, ATTORNEY ODESSA DICKMAN, ATTORNEY PETE PATTERSON, AND A REPRESENTATIVE FROM DION'S COURT REPORTING AND A FEW OF THESE MEMBERS ATTORNEYS APPEARING MAY APPEAR VIA ZOOM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT CONCLUDES 13 DAYS ANNOUNCEMENT. IT'S 1024. WE'LL TAKE A TEN MINUTE BREAK A

[15.A) An Ordinance Amending Section 30-336 Stormwater Management Utility Fees Set Forth in Appendix “A” Fees and Charges Schedule of the Code of Ordinances, City of Naples, to Reflect a Four-Year Annual Rate Adjustment;  Providing for Codification; Conflicts; Severability; Correction of Scrivener’s Errors; Construction; Publication; and an Effective Date.]

OKAY, WE'RE BACKM OUR SHORT BREAK. CONTINUING ON WITH ITEM 15, A MR. MCCONNELL.

YES. THANK YOU. MAYOR. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3336 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY FEES SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF NAPLES TO REFLECT A FOUR YEAR ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION.

CONFLICT. SEVERABILITY, CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS. CONSTRUCTION, PUBLICATION, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU, MR. YOUNG. YES, MAYOR. I'LL BE BRIEF. FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK LISA FOR ALL OF HER HARD WORK IN HELPING ME GET THIS PREPARED AND AND DOCTOR GOMEZ HELPING ME CARRY IT OVER THE FINISH LINE WITH LISA. THIS IS THE SECOND READING INSTITUTING A FOUR YEAR INCREASE IN STORMWATER RATES FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING 20 OR IN 20 PLUS YEARS, AND MULTI-YEAR INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AND GENERATING 168 MILLION OVER THAT PERIOD OF TIME, OF WHICH WE WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO LEVERAGE AGAINST CONTINUED FEDERAL AND STATE ASSISTANCE, BECAUSE, AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE OVER 280 MILLION JUST SHORT TERM HORIZON ON OVERALL INFRASTRUCTURE. BUT AS YOU LOOK AT THE MULTI BASIN ASSESSMENT, IT COMES IN AT WELL OVER 600 MILLION. SO THIS IS PUTTING A LONG TERM FUNDING MECHANISM IN PLACE. AND AS WE BEGIN TO DESIGN THE ITEMS THAT YOU'VE ALREADY BUDGETED FOR AND THIS YEAR'S BUDGET, IT PUTS A FUNDING MECHANISM THAT WILL THAT WILL, YOU KNOW, SET US UP TO BE IN POSITION TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROJECTS ONCE THEY'RE DESIGNED AND BID. SO WITH THAT, I'M ASKING FOR YOUR APPROVAL TO INSTITUTE A FOUR YEAR PHASED IN INCREASE TO GENERATE THOSE REVENUES. AND I WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT. SO THANK YOU. THAT'S ON BEHALF OF COUNCIL, MISS DOUGLAS AND DOCTOR GOMEZ. THANK YOU. ON BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY. THANK YOU, MR. YOUNG. THIS COUNCIL SHOULD BE SO PROUD I DON'T PROUD ISN'T SOMETHING I USUALLY SAY, BUT SATISFIED THAT WE HAVE FULFILLED A MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR THIS CITY THROUGH THE HELP OF OUR STAFF AND THE WILLINGNESS OF OUR COMMUNITY TO PAY THE INCREASE, AND FOR US TO FINALLY ACCOMPLISH INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS WELL OVERDUE AND IN NEED OF UPGRADES AND CHANGES. AND THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING. THIS IS A BIG TASK OF COORDINATION AND PROJECTS, AND I'M JUST VERY HUMBLED AND THANKFUL AND GRATEFUL THAT THIS IS HAPPENING FOR US. SO WITH THAT, I DO NOT HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT. DO I HAVE ANY DISCUSSION OR EMOTION? MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM 15 A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 30 DASH 336 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY

[01:55:06]

FEES SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE THE ORDINANCES SECOND. MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CRAMER AND A SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER PETRANOFF. MADAM CLERK, PLEASE PULL THE COUNCIL. COUNCIL MEMBER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. CRAMER. YES. VICE MAYOR.

HUTCHINSON. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. PENMAN. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. KRISEMAN. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER.

BARTON. YES. MAYOR. HARTMAN. YES. COUNCIL PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU AND GOOD LUCK. AND GO

[17) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND STAFF]

FORTH. GET IT DONE. WITH THAT WE ARE GOING TO ITEM 16 PUBLIC COMMENT OR WE HAVE NO PUBLIC COMMENT SLIPS. WE'LL GO TO COMMUNICATIONS, CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS. COUNCIL MEMBER CRAMER ONLY ONE THING I MISSPOKE. I SHOULD NOT HAVE USED THE FARMERS MARKET AS AN EXAMPLE BECAUSE WE HAVE SO MANY FOLKS GO TO THAT. BUT I'M JUST SUGGESTING THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF EVENTS IN OUR CITY THAT HAVE A VERY SMALL PERCENTAGE OF OUR CITIZENS THAT ARE REALLY INVOLVED, THAT'S ALL. AND. REMINDER TO EVERYBODY, WE'LL SEE YOU BACK HERE THIS WEEK, TOMORROW FOR CRA. AND NEXT MONDAY FOR WORKSHOP, AND A WEEK FROM THE DAY FOR COUNCIL.

JUST REMINDING ALL OF THOSE FOLKS AT HOME. HI, HON. THAT'S ALL THANKS. AND WITH THAT, WE HAVE THE TREE LIGHTING ON FIFTH FRIDAY. LIGHTING UP TREE. I'VE NEVER BEEN THERE, BY THE WAY, FOR THIS ONE. I ALWAYS GO TO THE OTHER ONE, BUT I'M I'M EXCITED TO BE AT THE TREE LIGHTING ON FRIDAY. FRIDAY. COUNCIL MEMBER PETRANOFF. THANK YOU CRAMER. JUST ONE QUICK COMMENT REGARDING THE PROPOSED WATER PARK AT NAPLES GRAND, WHICH IS JUST NORTH ON SEAGATE.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE HAD A CHANCE TO TO SPEAK WITH, YOU KNOW, OUR CONSTITUENTS AND THEIR CONCERNS. I THINK THEY ARE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS THAT THEY HAVE. I'M ACTUALLY MEETING THIS EVENING WITH. NAPLES GRANT TO UNDERSTAND MORE DEEPLY SOME OF THE CONCERNS, WHICH INCLUDE NOISE FROM A SLIDES AND WATER PARKS, ETCETERA. IT INCLUDES TRAFFIC ON SEAGATE, WHERE WE ALREADY HAVE, YOU KNOW, A SCHOOL, A COUPLE CHURCHES, A VERY CLUNKY SOUTH TO SOUTHBOUND TURN LANES. IT'S IT THEIR CONCERN IS WITH TRAFFIC, PARKING, ETCETERA, AND MAKING THAT AREA MORE INTENSE AND POSSIBLY LESS SAFE. SO IT I'LL BE MEETING WITH THEM. I YOU KNOW, I HOPE THAT MY FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS GET A CHANCE TO AT LEAST TALK TO THE NEIGHBORS, MAYBE TALK TO THE HYATT, OR RATHER NAPLES GRAND TO UNDERSTAND MORE OF THE SPECIFICS ON WHAT THEY'RE PLANNING. PELICAN BAY IS REALLY DRIVING. YOU KNOW THIS FOR RIGHT NOW. IT HAS IT'S IT'S A COUNTY. YOU KNOW, IT'S A COUNTY APPROVAL. BUT THE PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION DOES TAKE A LOOK AND HAS A BALANCING ACT OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. SO THEY'RE THEY'RE CHEWING THROUGH THAT. BUT THERE'S THREE. ONE OF THE CONDO COMPLEXES HIRED AN ATTORNEY OVER IN PELICAN BAY AND AND HAS MADE SOME PRETTY COGENT ARGUMENTS ON WHAT THE SOME OF THE ISSUES ARE WITH AN INTRODUCTION OF A WATER PARK.

SO THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU. WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT. I HAVE HEARD FROM A LARGE GROUP OF OUR RESIDENTS, AND WE NEED TO PROTECT THEIR INTEREST OF COMMERCIAL INTRUSION UPON THEIR RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. I BELIEVE THAT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD JUST AGREE UPON TO SEND A LETTER TO THE COUNTY OPPOSING THIS. INTRUSION UPON RESIDENTIAL AREA. SO IF THERE'S ANYONE'S OPPOSED TO THAT, I'D LIKE TO HEAR THE OPPOSING. IT'S A GREAT IDEA, A GREAT IDEA.

THANK YOU. KRISTEN, I WAS GOING TO ACTUALLY BRING THIS UP MYSELF. I'M GLAD COUNCILWOMAN PETRANOFF DID. AND JUST WE'VE RECEIVED ALL OF US, I'M SURE, HAVE HAD MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS WITH RESIDENTS CONCERNED ABOUT THIS. AND WE DID RECEIVE CORRESPONDENCE FROM PATRICK WACK, THE HEAD OF THE SEAGATE ASSOCIATION, AND THE THE. I WAS GOING TO SIMPLY BRING IT UP AND

[02:00:06]

ALSO ASK, YOU KNOW, HOW AND WHEN WE MIGHT HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS, PERHAPS NOT JUST IN COURT COMMUNICATIONS, BUT GIVEN THE RECOGNIZING WE ONLY HAVE A LIMITED NUMBER OF MEETINGS, BUT ALSO THAT THIS IS SOMEWHAT OF A TIME SENSITIVE MATTER TO AGREE ON APPROPRIATE ACTION. MAYBE WE CAN JUST DO IT IN COMMUNICATIONS. BUT BUT I YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S JUST A FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE PROJECT, I THINK IT'S A TERRIBLE IDEA. I MEAN, PUTTING IN AN AMUSEMENT PARK IN THAT LOCATION, EFFECTIVELY WHAT IT IS, IS JUST A BAD IDEA. BUT ASSUMING WHAT'S BEING REPORTED IS WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING PROPOSED. BUT I KNOW MR. WACK WAS ALSO SUGGESTING A STRATEGIC APPROACH THAT, FOR EXAMPLE, DID NOT INVOLVE GOING TO THE COUNTY AT THIS TIME. IF I'M REMEMBERING HIS EMAIL CORRECTLY.

SO. SO THE QUESTION MY ONLY CAUTION, MAYOR, IS NOT THAT WE SHOULDN'T COME DOWN WITH A POSITION ON THIS, BUT WHAT IS THE BEST STRATEGIC APPROACH TO BE EFFECTIVE? THAT'S ALL. WELL.

I WOULD AGREE, BUT HE'S NOT GIVEN HIS STRATEGIC APPROACH. I THINK IT'S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ELECTED OFFICIALS TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THOSE RESIDENTS. OPPOSING IT. AS SIMPLE AS THAT. SO I UNDERSTAND HIS EFFORTS, BUT I ONLY AND HE'S HE'S NOT JUST HE HE IS THE HEAD OF THE HOA REPRESENTING THE MOST IMPACTED AREA. THAT'S THE REASON I'M BRINGING IT UP.

THAT'S ALL. WELL, IF THERE'S A CONSENSUS THAT WE'RE ALL OPPOSED TO IT, IF THERE'S NOT, I WONDER IF WE COULD MAYBE BEFORE THE A LETTER WOULD GO OUT, JUST HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THE HEAD OF THE HOA BECAUSE WE DO WANT TO WE WANT TO BE HELPFUL. YES, YES. RIGHT.

AND JUST AND MAYBE HE'LL JUST SAY, HEY, THAT'S GOOD. THAT'S A GOOD CALL. YEAH. WHAT STRATEGICALLY WHAT WHAT WHAT CAN WE NOT WE WANT TO WE WANT TO EXPRESS OUR POINT OF VIEW.

BUT HOW CAN WE DO IT IN THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY? YEAH. FROM AND COORDINATE BEST WITH WHAT THEY'RE DOING. YES. WE CAN SAY THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU ON BEHALF OF OUR RESIDENTS. AND I HATE TO BRING THIS UP, BUT Y'ALL KNOW ABOUT AND IT WAS APPROVED. I THINK THE HORSE HAS LEFT THE BARN ON THE TRIANGLE PROJECT WITH A FIVE STORY BUILDING. AND ALL THOSE UNITS IN THE MARINA, RIGHT BY WHERE THE PAWN SHOP IS THERE, 66 HOMES. YEAH, YEAH. WHERE WHERE THE PAWN SHOP IS ON DAVIS. RIGHT THERE BY ALL THE WAY UP TO AIRPORT. IT'S. I BELIEVE IT WAS APPROVED. I COULD BE WRONG. I HOPE I'M WRONG. BUT IF MY REASON I'M MENTIONING IT IS, I DON'T KNOW HOW WE GET AHEAD OF THIS AND EXPRESS OUR CONCERN FOR ALL OF THESE PROJECTS THAT ARE PINCH POINTS FOR THE CITY WHERE WE'RE GOING TO. EVERYTHING'S COMING TO US. IN THE SEAGATE CASE, IT WOULD BE THE SOUTH, AND THIS CASE IT WILL BE WEST. AND WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE POLICE AND FIRE AND AND MAINTAIN THE ROADS AND JUST ALL OF THE STUFF THAT THAT KIND OF GETS IGNORED, THAT WE'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATER. YEAH. YEAH. RIGHT. SO I THINK THAT YOU BRING UP THE LARGER POINT THAT MR. YOUNG IS VERY IS AWARE OF THAT WE I KNOW THAT STAFF HAS BEEN DOING RESEARCH ON THAT PROBABLY NEEDS TO BE EXPEDITED AND MORE OF A STRATEGIC CONVERSATION OF HOW WE'RE GOING TO ADDRESS THE OVERALL. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHEN THAT PROJECT IS GOING BEFORE THE COMMISSION. AND I DON'T WANT TO BE LEFT SAYING NOTHING.

YES, I AGREE, I WANT TO BE HELPFUL. BUT, YOU KNOW, SIMPLY JUST SAYING NOT THE BEST INTEREST, NOR DOES THE CITY, THE RESIDENTS WANT IT. AND IT'S AN INTRUSION OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL, JUST AS OUR COMP PLAN WOULD SAY IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION.

BUT I THINK TO YOUR POINT, COUNCILMAN KRAMER, THERE IS A BIGGER CONVERSATION THAT NEEDS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR SURE. YEAH. ONE THING THAT MIGHT BE HELPFUL IS TO HAVE SOME OF OUR EXPERTS TAKE A CURSORY LOOK AT WHAT THESE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ARE LIKE. ONE IS DEFINITELY THE STREET SEAGATE. AND, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THE KIDS IN THE CITY GO TO GO TO THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. AND THAT THAT REALLY STACKS UP, AND IT'S GOING TO STACK UP MORE IF THIS GOES THROUGH, BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE OFFERING DAY PASSES TO FOLKS TO COME IN AND AND ENJOY THE WATER PARK. AND SO AND THE TWO FUNNY TURNS, WHAT, YOU KNOW, WHAT IS GOING TO BE THE IMPACT

[02:05:06]

ON ON SEAGATE. TRAFFIC WISE, SAFETY WISE, ETC. THE OTHER PIECE IS, AND I'VE ALREADY SPOKE WITH OUR CITY ATTORNEY ABOUT THIS, IS WE DO HAVE A NOISE ORDINANCE IN IN PLACE.

AND I GUESS IT VARIES BY TIME OF DAY AND NIGHT AND WHAT REALLY TAKING A LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENS IF SOMEBODY OUTSIDE OF THE JURISDICTION IS CREATING THE NOISE ISSUE, WHAT ARE OUR RIGHTS, ETCETERA. AND LIVING OVER IN A HOME IN SEAGATE WHERE THEY'RE HITTING 70DB OR 80DB, YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT, IF ANYTHING? BECAUSE THAT WILL UNDOUBTEDLY COME UP IF THIS GOES FORWARD. CAN I ADD ON HERE, BEING ON TDC, IT'S ODD TO ME THAT THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WOULD APPROVE ANY A WATER PARK BASED ANYTHING ELSE WHEN SUN AND FUN. THEY'VE JUST HAD TO SINK MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN LIKE ALL PARKS, THEY IT'S A NET LOSER. I MEAN, WHY WOULD YOU ENCOURAGE COMPETITION? AND WE HAVE ONE COUNTY PLUS WE HAVE. YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD POINT. YEAH. GREAT WOLF I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW. OH, NO, BUT WE HAVE A WATER PARK. THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. SOUTHERN FRONT. NO, THE THERE'S GREAT WOLF LODGE AND.

OH SORRY. AND THERE'S, AND THERE'S SUN FUN SUN AND FUN COUNTY OWNS IS WHAT I'M SAYING.

AND IT'S A NET LOSER FOR THEM. LIKE WHY WOULD YOU ENCOURAGE SOMEBODY TO BUILD A COMPETITION TO SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE LOSING MONEY ON ALREADY? I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE LOGIC. RIGHT. SO ANYWAY, I THAT'S I DON'T KNOW. THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. YEAH. SO AS SIMPLE AS A LETTER GOING TO THE COUNTY OPPOSING THIS FOR THE REASONS STATED ASAP, I THINK IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY NEED TO KNOW BEFOREHAND IF THEY'RE IN NEGOTIATIONS OR DISCUSSING WITH ANYONE OR WHERE WE STAND. COULD WE WAIT UNTIL BETH HAS A CHAT WITH THE HOTEL MANAGER? I'D BE HAPPY TO AND GIVE A REPORT BACK TO TOMORROW IF YOU WANT, WITH HOTEL MANAGER WITH PETER LUNENBURG, WHO'S THE NEW THE NEW OWNERS WHO ARE BUILDING THIS PARK. AND ALSO, I THINK WHATEVER LETTER IS WRITTEN SHOULD GO AHEAD. PATRICK SHOULD GO BY PATRICK FIRST, JUST AS A COURTESY, SINCE HE'S THE HEAD OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND ASKED US, I AGREE. I'D LIKE I'D LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THE MANAGER HAS TO SAY. BETH, I THINK, AND IF THERE WOULD BE A WAY FOR YOU TO SEND SOME SORT OF A COMMUNIQUE THAT ISN'T BREAKING SUNSHINE, I CAN DO IT IN THE PUBLIC AND CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATION, IF YOU KNOW, OR I CAN BRING YOU SEND IT TO ME.

OR YOU COULD OR YOU COULD WAIT AND DO IT UNDER COMMUNICATIONS ON MONDAY THE EIGHTH, WHICH IS NEXT WEEK, TWO THREE BUSINESS DAYS FROM TODAY. AND THEN WE COULD HAVE THE COMMUNICATION DRAFTED. IN THE MEANTIME, I CAN HAVE THE CONVERSATION WITH PATRICK AND AND MAKE SURE THE DRAFT VERSION AND THEN DIFFERENT THINGS LIKE THIS AS A COURTESY TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL GOING IN THE SAME DIRECTION. WE CAN FINALIZE IT THAT DAY AND THEN AND ON IN TERMS OF THAT MONDAY, AND THEN WE'LL SEND IT OUT ON TUESDAY. NOT TO ADD TO YOUR YOUR LIST, MR. YOUNG, BUT I KNOW PARK SHORE ASSOCIATION PARTICULARLY AND EVEN GSAC HAVE AN INTEREST IN THIS MATTER AS WELL. NOT PERHAPS NOT AS DIRECTLY IMPACTED AS SEAGATE BUT BUT AND AND NAPLES CAY HAS ITS OWN HOA AS WELL. SO. I CAN REACH OUT TO ALL OF THE HOA PRESENTS AND JUST HAVE A GENERAL CONVERSATION AS WELL. THAT WAY IT INCORPORATES ASPECTS OF THEIR OPINIONS. YOU KNOW, AGAIN, WE'RE TRYING TO DO ONE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT, SO IT'S NOT GOING TO I THINK WE'RE ALL TALKING FROM THE SAME CONCERN. SO I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO DEVIATE THAT MUCH. SO THAT'S FINE. WELL I AGREE YEAH. AND SPEAKING OF THE DEVIL, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THAT, IF THAT ON THE SOUTH SIDE WAS APPROVED ON OFF OF DAVIS IF THAT YOU KNOW DEVELOPMENT IT WOULD BE NICE TO GET I DON'T KNOW HOW WE GET IN THE LOOP OF, OF OPINING ON THIS STUFF BECAUSE I KNOW THAT ROYAL HARBOR AND OYSTER BAY ARE PARTICULARLY AFFECTED. AND, YOU KNOW, THEY THEY WE MET ABOUT THE MARRIOTT THAT'S GOING IN IT'S KITTY CORNER FROM THE DAVIS TRIANGLE. AND YEAH, I'M STILL TRYING TO CLOSE THAT LOOP. AS YOU'VE NOTICED, EVEN IN THE LAST TWO WEEKS, YOU'VE GOTTEN INFORMATION ON PROJECTS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF OUR BORDERS THAT WE WEREN'T OTHERWISE GETTING. AND SO AS SOON AS ERICA RECEIVED IT, WE HAD FORWARDED IT TO EVERYONE. SO WE STILL WE HAVE HAD MEETINGS WITH THEM TRYING TO MAKE SURE WE GET IT

[02:10:02]

SOONER RATHER THAN LATER, BUT THERE STILL SEEMS TO BE LAG AND THAT IT THE COMMUNITY FINDS OUT BEFORE OUR FOR WE ARE. SO I'LL I'LL CONTINUE TO TRY TO MAKE THAT LOOP SMALLER SO THAT I GET IT SOONER. YEAH. I REALLY I ALSO DO TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS FROM OUR STAFF PERSPECTIVE. I IMMEDIATELY GO TO IS OUR IS IT OUR WATER? THAT'S WHY I SENT IT TO YOU SO THAT I KNEW THAT WHETHER OR NOT IT'S OUR WATER WE'RE TALKING ABOUT AND AND OUR SEWER DISTRICT. SO WE'LL CONTINUE TO TRY TO IMPROVE THAT. AND SPECIFICALLY ON ON THE ONE ON WE WILL I'LL REACH OUT ON THAT ONE BECAUSE I HADN'T HEARD ABOUT THAT ONE UNTIL THE GRAPEVINE, WHICH IS WHAT I HAD ASKED, THAT I NEVER HAVE TO HEAR THAT WAY. SO I'LL DOUBLE DOWN WITH THE COUNTY ON THAT REQUEST AS WELL. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MAYOR. TO THAT POINT, MR. YOUNG, I THINK BEING I KNOW WE HAVE NEW COUNCIL COMING ABOUT, BUT IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA THAT WE GO AND REVIEW THE WATER. I'M SORRY. THE. NOT THE YES, THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, BUT THE. WATER MASTER PLAN. YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. YES, MA'AM. IT WILL BE A GOOD TIME TO DO THAT.

AND AND AND AGAIN, THE ONE THAT THE ONE THING IS, IS CHANGE BRINGS REREVIEW. AND AS YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, MR. MIDDLETON LEFT AFTER 33 YEARS. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NEW LEADERSHIP IN PLACE. AND THAT'LL WARRANT A REVISITING ANYWAY. SO I THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD, GOOD TIME TO HAVE EVERYBODY ON THE SAME PAGE AS WELL. EXCELLENT.

INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN. THANK YOU. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER. YEAH. JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY. SO MARTY DOESN'T JUST HISTORICALLY PULL THE THE COMMISSION'S AGENDAS EACH WEEK OR WHENEVER THEY MEET. SO WE KNOW WHAT WHAT IT IS THAT THE THE COUNTY'S IT'S A GOOD IDEA. IF NOT SO WE KNOW WHAT THEY'RE BECAUSE SO MUCH IS THAT SO MUCH OF WHAT THEY'RE DOING IS AFFECTING US NOW WOULD SEEM TO ME TO PULL THE AGENDA SO WE KNOW AHEAD OF TIME THAT NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT, MA'AM, BUT RESPECTFULLY, WE HAD ASKED OTHER PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS WHEN IT HIT THEIR DESK AND IT WAS IN ON OUR BORDERS TO ASK FOR THAT RELATIONSHIP. I'M TRYING TO GET THE INFORMATION EVEN PRIOR TO TO IT BEING ON AN AGENDA, THAT BECAUSE THERE'S WHEN WE GET THE I MEAN, THERE'S INITIALLY, ESPECIALLY IF IT'S IN OUR WATER SERVICE AREA, THERE'S A LETTER THAT COMES IN AND THERE'S NOTIFICATION. YEAH, THE ONES IN QUESTION ARE OUTSIDE OF ANY SERVICE AREA, BUT IT IS ON OUR BORDER. SO THAT SAME THAT'S THE ONE THAT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE ON A COURTESY PERSPECTIVE I WOULD ALSO APPRECIATE. SO I JUST WANT TO CONTINUE THAT DIALOG. IT'S A FAIR POINT YOU'RE MAKING THERE. AND I'M NOT. IT'S A GREAT POINT. I JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW I ACTUALLY DON'T WANT TO FIND ABOUT IT THE FIRST DAY WHEN IT'S PUBLISHED. I'D LIKE TO KNOW EVEN BEFORE THAT, THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I'M TRYING TO GET AT. UNDERSTOOD. WE ALL WANT TO KNOW BEFORE TIM AND THE KNOW KNOWS. YEAH, YEAH. AND I DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF TIME, SO.

OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER PETRANOFF COMPLETE. I'M COMPLETE. THANK YOU. OKAY.

THANKS. COUNCIL MEMBER CUSHMAN. NOTHING ELSE TODAY. MAYOR. OKAY. BARTON. NOPE. MY ALL MY CONCERNS WERE ALREADY ADDRESSED, WHICH IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN DISCUSSING FOR THE LAST TEN MINUTES. JUST A THOUGHT AFTER TODAY'S DISCUSSION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT AT SOME POINT IN TIME, MAYBE WE OUGHT TO CHARGE MORE FOR SPECIAL EVENTS, WHICH WOULD THEN OFFSET PERHAPS THE COST TO THE YOUNG, THE YOUNG CHILDREN PLAYING BASEBALL, AND MAYBE START TO CONTROL SOME OF OUR SPECIAL EVENTS RELATIVE TO OUR WISHES THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT HERETOFORE. SO WE MIGHT WANT TO LOOK AT HOW MUCH WE WANT TO CHARGE NOW FOR SPECIAL EVENTS. AND THAT COULD OFFSET SOME OF THESE LITTLE LEAGUE TEAMS. AS JUST AS A THOUGHT, WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT SPECIAL EVENTS, I THINK THE CHARGES AND FEES SHOULD BE DETAILED FOR US, WHICH THAT'LL BE A BETTER PIECE.

ALONG WITH THE POLICE SEPARATE BECAUSE THAT POLICE HAS INCREASED. SO WE CAN REALLY LOOK AT THE TOTAL PICTURE. GOOD AS CAN THE PERSON THAT IS APPLYING FOR THE RIGHT. YES, EXACTLY. MAY THE JUICE MAY BE WORTH MAY NOT BE WORTH THE SQUEEZE. RIGHT? COMPLETE. THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR. I MEAN, IT'S 11:00, MADAM MAYOR, AND SOMETHING'S WRONG. WE'RE GETTING VERY CLOSE TO FINISHING THIS MEETING, SO I, I HAD I, I HAD A COMMENT I WAS GOING TO

[02:15:02]

MAKE TOMORROW, BUT IN LIGHT OF OUR ABUNDANCE OF TIME, I JUST WANT TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE THIS USING THIS CORRESPONDENCE COMMUNICATION BECAUSE I THINK IT IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO DO IT NOW. SO I WANTED TO MAKE A COMMENT. AND THIS IS RELATED TO THE NEW PROCESS WE DESIGNED FOR SELECTING CANDIDATES TO THE NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY. AND I WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE SELECTED NA CANDIDATES. THIS IS MORE ABOUT THE PROCESS. AND WE ALL LIVE THIS JUST NOT TOO LONG AGO. OKAY. SO WE WE KIND OF FORGE THROUGH IT. IN MY OPINION, IT WAS A LITTLE MESSY AND IT WASN'T. WE LEFT IT BECAUSE WE GOT THE WORK DONE RIGHT. AND THERE'S THERE'S OTHER CITY COUNCILS AROUND THE COUNTRY EVEN CLOSER TO HOME HERE THAT CAN'T SEEM TO GET THAT DONE. BUT WE MANAGED TO GET IT DONE. BUT AFTER MY STATEMENTS HERE, YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR MY ASK AND THE CONSIDERATION THAT WE DON'T JUST LEAVE IT WHERE IT IS, BECAUSE I THINK THERE'S SOME WORK UNDONE. SO AGAIN, THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE SELECTED NA CANDIDATES, ALTHOUGH THEY'RE NOT MY SELECTIONS. MY INTENTION IS NOT TO DISPARAGE THOSE APPOINTEES, BUT RATHER TO COMMENT ON THE PROCESS. I BELIEVE WE GOT IT WRONG IN AT LEAST TWO WAYS. FIRST, I WANT TO APPLAUD COUNCILWOMAN PETRANOFF AND IDENTIFYING THAT THE RANKING SYSTEM WAS NOT REFERENCED IN THE AIRPORT ACT THAT DEALS WITH SUCH MATTERS, AND THE ACT SIMPLY SAYING AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS IS SUFFICIENT TO APPOINT A COMMISSIONER TO THE NA. COUNCILWOMAN PETRANOFF NOTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN CONCERN IN THE COMMUNITY, WHICH WAS AFFIRMED BY ALL OF US, THAT THE RANKING SYSTEM COULD BE MANIPULATED. I BELIEVE IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO TO SET IT ASIDE, BUT THE NEXT RIGHT MOVE WOULD HAVE BEEN TO CONSIDER THE COMPLETE LIST OF CANDIDATES ACCEPTING MOTIONS FOR A CANDIDATE AND VOTING THAT CANDIDATE UP AND DOWN, UP OR DOWN. IT MAY HAVE TAKEN LONGER, BUT THE CANDIDATES DESERVE THAT CONSIDERATION IN DOING SO WOULD HAVE BEEN AS COMPLIANT AS POSSIBLE WITH THAT AUTHORIZING ACT THAT THAT DESCRIBES WHAT WE SHOULD DO IN THIS SITUATION.

NOWHERE IN THE LAW DID IT SAY WE SHOULD REDUCE THE POOL. REMEMBER THE POOL OF CANDIDATES, REDUCE THAT POOL BY DISCUSSION OR VOTE TO A SUBSET OF CANDIDATES COMING UP WITH ANOTHER SHORT LIST FOR CONSIDERATION. IN OTHER WORDS, WE HAVE WE HAVE THESE CANDIDATES, THESE APPLICANTS, THEY NEED TO STAND ON THEIR OWN MERIT. BUT THAT'S WHAT WE DID.

WE CAME UP WITH A SUBSET. AND I BELIEVE THAT THAT WAS WRONG. THERE WAS ANOTHER MISSTEP THAT I BELIEVE SHOULD NOT GO UNNOTICED. AT THE START OF THE MEETING, THE CITY ATTORNEY INFORMED US HOW THE VOTE WOULD BE CONDUCTED. WE ALL AGREE. IN RETROSPECT, I'M SORRY I AGREED.

AND FOR THE RECORD, I HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY. TELLING HIM BEFORE THE MEETING THAT I BELIEVE CREATING ANY KIND OF A SUBSET WOULD BE WRONG, THAT WE NEED TO JUST VOTE UP OR DOWN, THAT A NAME COMES FORWARD. IF YOU RECALL HOW THAT SEQUENCE WENT, COUNCILMAN BARTON BROUGHT A NAME FORWARD. IT WAS SECONDED. A VOTE WAS MADE. THEN ANOTHER NAME CAME FORWARD. A MOTION WAS MADE. IT WAS SECONDED. BUT THEN IT WAS HALTED. OKAY. IT WAS HALTED IMMEDIATELY. SO THAT'S THE PROCESS THAT BECOME BECAME THE REAL UGLY SAUSAGE MAKING THAT WE FINALLY ABLE TO FORGE THROUGH THAT AND MAKE MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT VOTE. COUNCILMAN KRISEMAN WAS ALLOWED TO OBJECT TO THAT PROCESS. AND RATHER THAN SELECT CANDIDATES IN TWO SEPARATE VOTES AS AGREED BY THIS COUNCIL, THE PROCESS WAS CHANGED SUCH THAT BOTH SEATS WERE FILLED IN ONE VOTE. THE CITY ATTORNEY INFORMED US THE CHANGE IN THE PROCESS WAS OKAY BECAUSE ANYTHING IS FIXABLE, AS HE STATED AT THAT POINT, AND I BELIEVE THAT THAT WAS WRONG. I THINK THAT IT DIDN'T. I DON'T THINK IT REALLY REFLECTED PROCEDURAL RULES FROM ROBERT'S RULES. OKAY. NOW THE CHANGE, IN MY OPINION, WAS DISRESPECTFUL TO COUNCIL'S AGREEMENT. PRE VOTE, PRE VOTE. IT WAS DISRESPECTFUL TO THE CANDIDATES.

REMEMBER WE CREATED THAT SUBSET. AND IT HAS LED TO SOME MISTRUST BY THE PUBLIC. SO MOVING FORWARD MY ASK IS THAT WE SHOULD AVOID THESE MISSTEPS WITH A CLEAR PROCESS THAT

[02:20:02]

ALLOWS EACH CANDIDATE TO COMPETE WITH A VOTE, AND THAT WE HOLD THE PUBLIC'S TRUST BY NOT CHANGING THE PROCESS IN THE MIDDLE OF A FORMAL VOTE. SO HERE'S MY ASK. MY ASK IS THAT WE USING THAT WE USE CONSENSUS TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO WORK WITH THE CITY CLERK IN FURTHER REVISING THE PROCESS, THE VOTING PROCESS, IN A MANNER WHICH ELIMINATES CONFUSION.

THAT'S WHAT WE ENDED UP WITH. WE ENDED UP WITH SOMETHING THAT WAS CONFUSING. THAT'S WHY THERE WAS RECONSIDERATIONS ALL KINDS OF STUFF HAPPENED. SO ELIMINATE CONFUSION AND COMPLIES WITH THE LAW. AND FURTHERMORE, THE CITY ATTORNEY SHOULD BRING THE MATTER FORWARD ON THE JANUARY 21ST, 2026 AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION AND HOPEFULLY ADOPTION WELL BEFORE THE NEXT AIRPORT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS ARE MADE. SO MY ASK IS LET'S TAKE THE TIME. HAVE HAVE THE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS, THE CITY CLERK, THE CITY ATTORNEY GET THIS. WHERE WE'RE COMPLY WITH THE LAW, WE DISCUSS IT, THEY BRING IT, WE PUT IT ON AN AGENDA. WE DISCUSS IT. THE COMMUNITY KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE DOING, AND WE ADOPT A PROCESS. AND WE SHOULD BE GOOD.

PLEASE, BARTON, I, I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOUR INTENT HERE. AND THAT IS TO REEVALUATE AND MAKE SURE WE'RE DOING IT RIGHT. YEAH. SO WITH THAT SAID, I AGREE WITH YOU AND I WILL I AGREE WITH THE CONSENSUS. NOW WITH IN THE SAME BREATH, I WILL ALSO STATE THAT I BELIEVE THAT ULTIMATELY THE PROCESS THAT WE ENDED UP USING LAST TIME, WHILE IT DID COME ACROSS AS CONFUSING BECAUSE WE ENDED UP HAVING TO, WE WERE MAKING IT UP AS WE WENT, SO TO SPEAK, AND WE HAD TO BACK UP AND MOVE FORWARD AND TAKE, TAKE, TAKE ONE STEP BACK SO WE CAN TAKE TWO STEPS FORWARD. AND I AGREE THAT THAT, THAT, THAT THE PROCESS THAT WE WENT THROUGH WAS A LITTLE BIT AWKWARD AND CONFUSING. I THINK THAT THE PROCESS ULTIMATELY ENDED UP WORKING. BUT AGAIN, WITH THAT SAID, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY HAVING CONVERSATIONS WITH CITY CLERK TO MAKE SURE THAT IF IN FACT, THAT WAS NOT THE RIGHT PROCESS AND THERE'S A BETTER ONE TO TO TO PRESENT US WITH WHAT HE WHAT THEY MIGHT CONSIDER TO BE A BETTER OPTION. AND I'M ALL FOR IT. AND I MIGHT MENTION THAT OUT OF THAT PROCESS THAT WE USE THE LAST TIME THREE CANDIDATES ENDED UP WITH FOUR VOTES. SO MATHEMATICALLY, THERE'S A THERE'S SOMETHING THAT HAS TO CHANGE AND WE HAVE THE TIME TO GET IT RIGHT. SO WE DON'T MUDDLE THROUGH THAT. THAT IS IT'S PROBLEMATIC IN MY OPINION. THERE'S PROBABLY A BETTER SOLUTION OUT THERE. AND I'M ALL EARS FOR IT. I'M OPEN MINDED AND HAPPY TO, AND I'M NOT TRYING TO INFLUENCE A CERTAIN WAY. I JUST I'M WITH YOU. THAT'S IT. YEAH. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. YES. I, I AGREE WITH YOU. I THINK IT WAS IT WAS CLUNKY AND AWKWARD A LITTLE BIT.

YOU KNOW, WE DID CHANGE THE PROCESS A BIT. I THINK THAT IN CONSIDERATION OF OUR CITY ATTORNEY LOOKING AT, AT THE THE PRIMA FACIE LANGUAGE ON, ON WHAT IS, WHAT ARE OUR ROLES THAT WE SHOULD ALSO LOOK AT MAYBE APPOINTING ONE PERSON AT A TIME? I THINK THE PROCESS GETS MUDDLED UP WHEN YOU HAVE A COUPLE DIFFERENT APPOINTMENTS, AND IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A LOT CLEANER HAD WE HAD JUST ONE CANDIDATE. SO JUST FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THIS, THANK YOU. SO, MADAM MAYOR, THAT THAT WAS THE EXTENT OF IT WAS AN ASK FOR A CONSENSUS FOR THE 21ST TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY. THANK YOU. YES, I I'M A YES. YES, I WANT TO COMMENT FIRST. SO I HAVE CUSHMAN AND THEN KRAMER ON THAT. SO I'M A YES IN THE SAME SPIRIT THAT COUNCILMAN BARTON ARTICULATED THAT THIS IS I HAVE I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE BEST PROCESS IS. I, I AGREE WITH SOME OF. VICE MAYOR HUTCHISON'S COMMENTS REGARDING WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE PROCESS AT THE LAST MEETING. WOULD DISAGREE WITH A COUPLE OF THINGS. I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO THAT TODAY, BUT THE POINT IS THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A PROCESS, WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT IT GOING FORWARD AND REACH AGREEMENT, AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF US, AS TO WHAT THAT PROCESS SHOULD BE. SHOULD IT BE WHAT WE USED IN THE MEETING LAST TIME OR SOMETHING DIFFERENT? AND AND I THINK WHAT SO I'M SUPPORTIVE OF STAFF AND OUR CITY ATTORNEY LOOKING AT THIS AND COMING BACK TO US IN JANUARY. THE OTHER POINT I

[02:25:02]

WANTED TO RAISE, THOUGH, IS THAT I'M ASSUMING, BUT MAYBE I'M WRONG, THAT WHATEVER PROCESS WE WANT TO USE GOING FORWARD FOR THE NA WOULD BE THE PROCESS WE WOULD USE FOR ALL OUR ADVISORY BOARDS. CORRECT? SO IT HAS. REACHING CLOSURE ON THIS. IT'S NOT JUST BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT A YEAR FROM NOW, WHEN THE NEXT NA BOARD APPOINTMENT COMES UP, BUT IT'S IMPORTANT WITH RESPECT TO ALL ADVISORY BOARD APPOINTMENTS BECAUSE WE WANT TO BE, I THINK, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROCESS. SO, SO, SO I'M I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH THE REQUEST BY THE VICE MAYOR WITH WITH THOSE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. AND I WILL ADD. IF IT GIVES FIRST OF ALL, IF, IF YOU'RE IF WHOEVER YOU WANTED ON THAT WASN'T APPOINTED, THEN YOU'RE GOING TO FIND A FLAW WITH SOMETHING. PROBABLY IF YOU'RE IF THERE'S ROOM FOR THAT. AND UNFORTUNATELY OUR PROCESS GAVE ROOM FOR THAT. WE HAD THE SAME SITUATION WITH PREVIOUS APPOINTMENT WITH FOLKS.

HATED THAT PROCESS WHEN THE ADMIRAL WASN'T APPOINTED. SO JUST THIS SIDE OF IT, YOU'RE ON, RIGHT? I WILL SAY THIS IF IT'LL MAYBE IT'LL HELP SOMEBODY. BASICALLY WHAT WHAT WE DID WAS HOLD A PRIMARY AND THEN VOTE ON THE WINNERS OF THE PRIMARY, WHICH IS A VERY LEGITIMATE WAY TO DO THINGS. JUST TO BE CLEAR, THAT IS A LEGITIMATE WAY TO DO THINGS. AND IF WE HADN'T HAD MATH ALLOWS IT, DEPENDING ON HOW MANY CANDIDATES. THERE'S DIFFERENT MATH EVERY TIME. BUT THIS MATH ALLOWED THAT THERE COULD BE A TIE FOR, FOR IT JUST HAPPENED TO GO THAT WAY. IF WE HAD DIFFERENT NUMBER OF CANDIDATES, IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THAT WAY OR A DIFFERENT NUMBER OF OF COUNCIL MEMBERS. POINT IS, YES, THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION, BUT LET'S NOT PRETEND LIKE THAT WASN'T LEGITIMATE BECAUSE IT'S A IT'S A VALID PROCESS. OUR CITY ATTORNEY ALSO WAS HERE AND ENSURED THAT. BUT I'M DEFINITELY I WAS I WAS THE ONE I WAS PRETTY ADAMANT THAT WE NEEDED JUST TO STICK WITH THE FLAWED PROCESS, BECAUSE THIS WAS INEVITABLE, THAT WE WERE GOING TO COME BACK AND HAVE TO FIX SOMETHING. SOMEBODY'S GOING TO GET HEATED ABOUT IT, WHICH IS THE CASE. FOLKS ARE HEATED, SOME FOLKS ARE, SOME VOCAL FOLKS ARE. SO HAVING SAID ALL THAT, I AM IN FULL SUPPORT, BUT I DO NOT SUPPORT. I MEAN, MAYBE IT'LL WIND UP THAT WAY, BUT WE'RE PULLING OUT OF A HAT AGAIN. WHICH WHICH WE LEFT.

WELL, THAT'S IF YOU GO ONE AT A TIME, THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE DOING. YOU'RE EITHER DOING IT ALPHABETICALLY OR YOU'RE DOING IT RANDOMLY. EITHER WAY, YOU'RE PULLING OUT OF A HAT. THAT'S WHAT ONE AT A TIME EQUATES. SO I AM NOT FOR THAT IF THAT MATTERS. BUT I AM FOR FOR MAKING IT VERY CLEAR, AS THE VICE MAYOR SAID, AND MAKING IT CONSISTENT AMONGST ALL OF THE APPOINTMENTS THAT WE DO. WELL, AS A REMINDER, WE HAVE GOOD GUIDANCE ALREADY BECAUSE THEY THE STATE LAID OUT THE PROCESS, WE LAID OUT THE PROCESS OF HOW WE'RE APPOINTING, OR MAYBE IT WAS THE CITY THAT WE KNOW AND EXACTLY HOW WE'RE TO DO IT. BY AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF FOUR. AND SO WHAT WHAT PROCESS MOST, MOST CLOSELY FOLLOWS? WHAT IS THE PLAIN WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN OUR LAW? SO IF I MAY, MAYOR. YES. THE STATE DID NOT LAY OUT A PROCESS OF HOW TO SELECT THE MEMBERS AND THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY ACT. THE STATE SIMPLY SAID, A MAJORITY OF YOU NEED TO SELECT THE MEMBER. THAT'S ALL FOUR. SO YOU NEED A MAJORITY OF YOU TO MAKE ANY DECISION. YOU NEED A MAJORITY OF YOU TO GIVE ANY DIRECTION. SO THAT'S JUST RESTATING THE FACT THAT THIS IS A SEVEN MEMBER BOARD. AND FOUR OF YOU NEED TO AGREE ON THE PERSON YOU'RE SELECTING. MY READ OF THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY ACT, THEY DID NOT LAY OUT A PROCESS ON HOW TO MAKE THAT SELECTION. THEY SIMPLY SAID THAT A MAJORITY OF YOU HAVE TO AGREE IN ORDER FOR THAT SELECTION TO BE FINAL. YEAH, THEY LAID OUT A PARTIAL PROCESS BECAUSE I DON'T THINK PULLING NAMES OUT OF A HAT WOULD FOLLOW THE LANGUAGE, THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THAT LAW. WHICH IS THE WAY WE USED TO DO IT. OKAY, SO, MAYOR, BEFORE WE GET CONSENSUS, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, BECAUSE I'M, I'M HAPPY TO PUT TOGETHER A RESOLUTION. I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA. JUST WANT TO REMIND YOU ALL THAT WE ACTUALLY DID HAVE A PROCESS THAT COUNCIL WAS USING FOR FIVE YEARS THAT WE DECIDED TO CHANGE. SO I WON'T START WITH THE RANKING PROCESS, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE JUST DID AWAY WITH. BUT TO COUNCIL MEMBER KRISEMAN'S POINT, IS THIS PROCESS SPECIFIC FOR THE NA OR FOR ALL BOARDS SO THAT I CAN DRAFT THE RESOLUTION ACCORDINGLY? I LIKE ALL BOARDS FOR ONE TO HAVE HAVE A SIMILAR PROCESS BECAUSE IT'S IT'S A

[02:30:01]

LITTLE FAIRER. I THINK THE RACK AND STACK METHOD WHERE WE, YOU KNOW, WHERE WE RANK ORDER PEOPLE, IT OFTEN DOES NOT PRODUCE THE THE TOP CANDIDATES. IT'S A MATHEMATICAL EXERCISE AND IT CAN GET YOU SOMEWHERE IN THE MIDDLE IF YOU'VE GOT A SPLIT DECISION HERE. SO I WOULD, I WOULD I THINK WE OUGHT TO FOLLOW ONE PROCESS. I WOULD SAY IN THAT SAME VEIN THAT THAT CONSISTENCY WILL WILL HELP ELIMINATE CONFUSION. SO I WOULD ALSO SUGGEST THAT MAYBE IT NEEDS TO BE ACROSS FOR ALL APPOINTMENTS. AND I WOULD ALSO WANT TO EMPHASIZE, THOUGH, THAT MATTHEW, THIS IS NOT MY UNDERSTANDING ON THIS CONSENSUS, IS THAT THIS CONSENSUS IS NOT DIRECTION FOR YOU TO FIND A DIFFERENT METHODOLOGY FROM WHAT WE JUST USED. THAT MAY BE THE RIGHT ONE. WE JUST WANT YOU TO, TO GO THROUGH THE EXERCISE OF MAKING SURE THAT IN YOUR OPINION, IN WORKING WITH STAFF, THAT THAT IS WHATEVER YOU COME TO THE TABLE WITH IS THE THE IN YOUR OPINION, THE BEST SOLUTION FOR MAKING THESE APPOINTMENTS? AND BY THE WAY, THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE ELIMINATING THE ONE THAT WE JUST USED. THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. OKAY. AND I WOULD ALSO ADD THAT I WOULD OPPOSE ANYTHING THAT IS FASTEST TO MAKE. THE MOTION CREATES AN ADVANTAGE. YES, THAT'S WHICH IS WHY THE WHOLE THEM BEING READ, THE BALLOTS BEING COMPLETED AND ENTERED SIMULTANEOUSLY ELIMINATES THAT. I DON'T I DON'T I JUST WANT TO I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO THAT DEAL WHERE SOMEONE DISCUSSION. YEAH OKAY. CLEAR DIRECTION. YES.

THANK YOU MAYOR I THINK THERE'S A CONSENSUS AMONG US IN THE DIRECTION THAT'S BEEN GIVEN.

OKAY. WHERE WAS I, VICE MAYOR? THE FINAL NOTE ON THAT SUBJECT. WE ALL RECEIVED A LETTER FROM A COALITION OF INDIVIDUALS, NAMELY, THEY WERE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS, BUT A COALITION WHO SAID THEY WOULD SUPPORT HOUSE BILL 4005. NOW, WHAT IS HOUSE BILL 4005? THAT'S THE BILL THAT'S SPONSORED BY REPRESENTATIVE HAUTANEN. THAT SUGGESTS THAT OUR APPOINTING AUTHORITY. NEEDS TO CHANGE. AND AND THEN ALLOW ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES TO THE NA. SO THIS LETTER THAT CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED SAID THEY THESE FOLKS SAID THEY WOULD SUPPORT THE HOUSE BILL 4005, REMOVING OUR AUTHORITY TO APPOINT COMMISSIONERS IF WE DID NOT SELECT ONE OF THEIR CHOICES FOR THE NA COMMISSION SEATS. THEY WENT ON TO SAY THEY BELIEVE THE BILL WOULD NOT MOVE FORWARD IF WE DID SELECT ONE OF THEIR CHOICES WELL, AND THEY PROVIDED US A LIST. SO THERE'S A LATIN TERM FOR THAT. IT'S CALLED QUID PRO QUO. THAT MEANS SOMETHING FOR SOMETHING OR THIS FOR THAT. AND WHAT DO YOU KNOW. THEIR ONE OF THEIR CANDIDATES WAS SELECTED. SO I'M SURE THAT YOU ALL WILL JOIN ME IN LOOKING FORWARD TO THESE PEOPLE. THE COALITION ACTIVELY WORKING TO FULFILL THE QUID PRO QUO. SO I'M HOPING THAT THAT HAPPENS.

THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. WELL, JUST FOR A CLARIFICATION ON THE COALITION LETTER, SPEAKING FOR A ENTIRE. H. OH. THERE'S A PROBLEM IN THAT PROCESS. PERIOD. THROUGHOUT THE YEARS, SOME COALITIONS, I MEAN, SOME HOA'S HAVE BEEN BETTER AT REPRESENTING THEIR ENTIRE HOMEOWNERS THAN OTHERS. AND THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE TO BE EXTREMELY CAREFUL WHEN WE SAY, LET'S LOOK AT WHAT THE HOA SAYS, BECAUSE IT'S ALL ABOUT HOW MUCH INPUT THEY HAVE RECEIVED FROM THEIR ENTIRE MEMBERSHIP, NOT JUST A FEW THAT MIGHT BE RUNNING THAT MEMBERSHIP. THEY ARE VOLUNTEERS. SO AGAIN, IF WE HAD TAKEN THAT, ALL OF US HAD TAKEN THAT AS A REASON TO VOTE IN SOME WAY OR ANOTHER. THE CONSIDERATION FOR ME WAS I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHO IS A PART OF THIS, EXCEPT FOR THE PERSON THAT STOOD UP AND SPOKE ABOUT IT, SAYING THAT THERE WAS THREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS. I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY TOOK THAT VOTE AND HOW I COULD STAND AND

[02:35:01]

SAY THAT THAT WAS ACTUALLY A FAIR REPRESENTATION. AND WE SHOULD JUST ALWAYS BE MINDFUL OF THAT. WHENEVER PEOPLE STAND UP AND SAY THEY REPRESENT EVERYBODY. AND I DON'T THINK ANYONE HERE MADE ANY KIND OF AN APPOINTMENT BASED ON A QUID PRO QUO. BUT IT DID WORK OUT THAT WAY, AND I'M JUST KIND OF INTERESTED TO SEE IF THE OFFER OF THAT QUID PRO QUO ACTUALLY COMPLETES, AS IT WAS STATED IT WOULD. SO THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU, MR. MCCONNELL.

YES, THANK YOU MAYOR. I'LL BE QUICK, BUT I DO HAVE A FEW THINGS I WANT TO MENTION.

NUMBER ONE BEING THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE. SO OBVIOUSLY THIS IS A COMMITTEE, AS YOU ALL KNOW, THAT HAS BEEN FORMED BY YOUR CHARTER. IT'S REFERENCED IN SECTION TWO. EVERY FOUR YEARS THEY REVIEW SALARIES AND PREPARE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AND CITY COUNCIL CAN EITHER AGREE AND MAKE THOSE CHANGES VIA ORDINANCE OR NOT. NOW WHAT THOSE CHANGES DO IS ACTUALLY AMEND LANGUAGE, AKA THE AMOUNTS THAT ARE ACTUALLY DEPICTED AND LISTED IN THE CITY CHARTER. SO I ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION, AND IT'S RESULTED IN WHAT I'M ABOUT TO TELL YOU, WHICH IS PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE CHAPTER 166 .031. THERE ARE A FEW EXEMPTIONS TO WHERE CHARTER AMENDMENTS DO NOT HAVE TO GO TO VOTER REFERENDUM. ONE OF THEM IS EXPANDING THE CITY'S BOUNDARIES, AND ONE OF THEM HAS TO DO WITH CHANGING ELECTION DATES. THIS IS NOT ONE OF THEM.

SO IT IS MY OPINION. AND ALTHOUGH THAT IT'S BEEN DONE A CERTAIN WAY BEFORE, I STAND BY MY OPINION THAT BECAUSE WE ARE AMENDING VERBIAGE AND LANGUAGE THAT IS DEPICTED IN THE CHARTER, THIS MUST GO TO A REFERENDUM OF THE VOTERS. THAT BEING SAID, I WORK DILIGENTLY YESTERDAY TALKING TO THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS AND TO THE CITY CLERK. THERE IS NO WAY WITH THE ADVERTISEMENTS THAT HAVE ALREADY OCCURRED FOR THE FEBRUARY 3RD ELECTION AND THE OUT OF STATE AND FOREIGN BALLOTS THAT ARE MAILED AS EARLY AS DECEMBER 20TH, THAT WE WILL MEET THE FEBRUARY 3RD ELECTION. HOWEVER, I COME WITH A FOLLOW UP OPTION, WHICH IS WE HAVE A PRIMARY ELECTION NEXT YEAR IN AUGUST. IT'S AUGUST 18TH. CONFIRM WITH THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS THAT WE COULD ADD BALLOT LANGUAGE TO THAT ELECTION. THAT LANGUAGE WOULD HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED BY JUNE 12TH, WHICH MEANS FIRST AND SECOND READING WILL HAVE TO OCCUR BEFORE THEN. BUT THAT DOES GIVE US MORE TIME TO KIND OF WORK THROUGH IT AND IN MY OPINION, ENSURE THAT WHATEVER IS APPROVED IS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTES AND THE LAW AS I INTERPRET IT. SO I WANTED TO MAKE YOU ALL AWARE OF IT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT YOU WILL NOT BE SEEING THAT ON DECEMBER 10TH. I KNOW IT WAS ON YOUR LOOK AHEAD FOR FIRST READING. IT WILL PROBABLY BE CLOSER TO FEBRUARY OR MARCH FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING, AND I WILL WORK WITH THE CLERK ON THE REQUIRED BALLOT. LANGUAGE, WHICH IS VERY SPECIFIC, HAS TO BE 75 CHARACTERS, TITLE HAS TO BE 15, ETC. VICE MAYOR. YEAH, THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR, AND THANK YOU, MR. MCCONNELL, FOR BRINGING THAT TO OUR ATTENTION.

SO COUNCIL AND FOR THE COMMUNITY, WHAT HE SAID THERE IS THAT WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING THE PROCESS FOR YEARS THAT, IN OUR ATTORNEY'S OPINION, IS FLAWED AND NOT COMPLIANT WITH THE LAW AS IT BECAUSE IT'S A CHARTER ISSUE. RIGHT. THAT'S SO IT DOESN'T MEET ONE OF THOSE TWO CRITERIA. SO MY ONLY ASK IS THIS WE THAT THAT ADDRESSES THIS TIME. BUT WE STILL HAVE THIS BLUE RIBBON PROCESS THAT NOW IF THIS IS THE NEW WAY, WE PROCEED AFTER BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEES MEET, THEN MY ASK IS A CONSENSUS TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO LOOK AT THE TIMING OF OUR BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE PROCESS AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE BACKING INTO IT IN A WAY THAT ALLOWS US TO GET IT ON WHATEVER BALLOT INITIATIVE. IT'S TIMELY IN THAT FASHION.

OKAY. BUT IT'S EVERY FOUR YEARS. CORRECT. SO. DOES THAT ANSWER THE QUESTION? BECAUSE NO, BECAUSE NO, NO, THERE'S DETAILS INSIDE OF THE TIMING. AND AS IT DOVETAILS WITH ELECTIONS. THANK YOU. BUT OKAY, SO CLARIFY FOR ME THAT THIS REFERENDUM IS GOING TO CLARIFY THE PROCESS OF SALARIES THAT HAS BEEN DONE CLARIFIED THROUGH RESOLUTIONS AND THAT ONCE IT GOES TO REFERENDUM, YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO TO REFERENDUM EVERY TIME. THAT IS NOT THE CASE. OKAY. SO

[02:40:07]

CLEAR. SO AND I THINK EVERY FOUR YEARS I THINK VICE MAYOR'S POINT IS WELL TAKEN. I THINK IF WHEN YOU ADD MY INTERPRETATION OF IT HAVING TO GO REFERENDUM, WE MAY NEED TO INCLUDE AN AMENDMENT ON WHEN THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE, IT'LL STILL BE EVERY FOUR YEARS, BUT IT MAY NEED TO BE FOUR MONTHS BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION OR FIVE MONTHS BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION, TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE ALLOWING US ENOUGH TIME TO ACTUALLY ADDRESS THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS AND ADD IT TO A BALLOT. I THINK THAT WAS THE POINT HE WAS MAKING. YEAH. WELL, SO MY POINT IS, WHEN WE HAD THIS DISCUSSION, THERE ARE OTHER CITIES AND COUNTIES THAT HAVE A PROCESS SIMILAR TO THIS. MOST JURISDICTIONS THAT I'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR SALARIES ARE IN THE CHARTER, AND THEY'RE IN THERE FOR A REASON, BECAUSE IF YOU CHANGE THEM, THEY HAVE TO GO TO THE VOTERS. SO UNLESS YOU ALL DECIDE WHICH YOU CAN TO REMOVE YOUR SALARIES COMPLETELY FROM THIS, FROM THE CHARTER, MY OPINION WOULD CHANGE. BUT IF WE CHANGE CHECKS A TEXT IN THE CHARTER, THAT'S NOT ONE OF THOSE FEW EXAMPLES I JUST LISTED. ANY AMENDMENT TO THE CHARTER MUST GO TO VOTER REFERENDUM. SO WOULDN'T THE LANGUAGE IN THE CHARTER BE CHANGED TO SAY EVERY FOUR YEARS THERE WOULD BE A BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE THAT WOULD REVIEW THE SALARIES? IS THAT WHAT THAT LANGUAGE IS ACTUALLY ALREADY IN YOUR CHARTER? SO SO THE ONLY THING THAT I'M SUGGESTING WE HAVE TO DO IS THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE MET. THEY COMPLIED WITH THE CHARTER REQUIREMENTS. THEY SUGGESTED AN INCREASE.

THAT INCREASE IS GREATER THAN WHAT'S CURRENTLY IN THE CHARTER. IN ORDER TO CHANGE THOSE NUMBERS IN THE CHARTER, WE WOULD HAVE TO GO TO VOTER REFERENDUM. MR. YOUNG YEAH. I JUST TO YOUR POINT THOUGH, MATTHEW, IF YOU CHANGE THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE'S CHARGE, WHICH IS IF YOU VOTED TO, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT SHALL BE ADOPTED PRIOR TO THE ELECTION, WHICH HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST, IF THAT WAS IN THE CHARTER AND REPEALED THE SECTION WHERE THEY WERE THERE, IT STILL IT COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THAT WAY.

I'M NOT SAYING THAT THIS COUNCIL DECIDE ONE VERSUS THE OTHER, BUT IT IS AN OPTION. IS THAT CORRECT? I THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU SAID. YOU SAID YOU'VE SEEN IT IN THERE. BUT I THINK TO THE MAYOR'S QUESTION SPECIFICALLY, THE BLUE RIBBON IS ALREADY IN THE CHARTER. AND IF THAT WAS AFFORDED THE LATITUDE, THAT COUNCIL MUST ADOPT THEM, AND THE CHARTER ALLOWS FOR THAT TO HAPPEN TO RESET IT, THAT'S WHAT WOULD GO IN THE BALLOT LANGUAGE, AS THEY ARE ALLOWING THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE AND SUBSEQUENT SUBSEQUENT COUNCILS AFTER THAT RECOMMENDATION TO AFFIRM A CHANGE, YOU WOULD HAVE TO TAKE IT OUT OF THE SECTION AND BY REFERENDUM IN ORDER FOR THAT TO OCCUR. IS THAT I'M JUST I'M JUST MAKING SURE I UNDERSTAND BECAUSE YOU SAID YOU COULD DO IT BOTH WAYS. IT'S JUST YOU WOULD HAVE TO YOU. EITHER WAY, YOU'RE AMENDING THE CHARTER AND IT MUST BE EXCLUDED FROM IT IN ORDER FOR THAT TO BE SO. WHEN YOU FINALIZE THIS, COUNCIL IS GOING TO HAVE TO EXPRESS WHAT THEY WANT THAT TO BE, OR THEY EVEN WANT THAT AUTHORITY TO REST IN COUNCIL, OR WHETHER THEY WANT IT TO BE AS PART OF IT, BECAUSE THE REFERENDUM ISN'T GOING TO BE AN IF, THEN GO TO IF YOU LIKE THIS, IT'S THIS, AND IF YOU DON'T, IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE WHAT BALLOT LANGUAGE DO YOU WANT AND WHAT IS YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. IS THAT A FAIR STATEMENT, GENTLEMEN? OH, SORRY.

YEAH. I'M SORRY. I'M JUST A LITTLE CONFUSED BY WHAT WAS SAID. WELL, WHAT I'M SAYING IS, IS RIGHT NOW YOU HAVE TWO THINGS IN THE CHARTER. CHARTER SAYS THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE MAKES A RECOMMENDATION, WHICH THEY DID. HISTORICALLY, IT HAS GONE TO AN ORDINANCE. AND THEN IT WAS IT WAS PUT IN THERE. AND THAT'S AGAINST THE LANGUAGE. IN A SEPARATE SECTION, IT SAYS THAT THE SALARIES ARE SET HERE. IF IT SAYS THE MAYOR, SETTING SALARIES SHALL BE RESET EVERY FOUR YEARS BY AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE IN A TWO READINGS. BASED ON THE DECISION OF THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE, IT COULD RESET IF THE CHARTER REFERENDUM SAID THAT WAS THE LANGUAGE. IF IT IS SET THERE WITH A SET AMOUNT, IT MUST, THEN THE NEW SET AMOUNT MUST GO BACK TO REFERENDUM. I'M ONLY SAYING WHEN YOU AMEND, THE CHARTER CAN BE AMENDED TWO DIFFERENT WAYS.

IT CAN BE TO INCLUDE THE AMOUNT, OR IT CAN SAY THAT THE BLUE RIBBON PANEL AND CORRESPONDING ADOPTION BY FIRST AND SECOND READING SHALL RESET THE SALARIES BASED ON THAT EVERY FOUR YEARS. I'M ONLY SAYING THAT THAT IS A DISCUSSION TO HAVE BEFORE YOU HAVE IT, BECAUSE THAT WAS WHAT THE MAYOR, I THINK WAS ALLUDING TO. AND I'M JUST SAYING BOTH ARE

[02:45:02]

POSSIBLE. SO JUST ONE OR THE OTHER MUST BE CHOSEN IF I CAN ASK A SECOND. YES. JUST CLARIFY.

SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS MAKE SURE I GET IT RIGHT THAT WE COULD. EITHER WAY, WE HAVE TO CHANGE THE CHARTER. YEAH, THAT'S FIRST WE GOTTA EITHER. CORRECT. YEAH. IF WE WE COULD CHANGE IT TO MAKE THE PROCESS THAT'S BEEN USED SINCE INCEPTION A LEGAL PROCESS. IF WE FAIL TO DO THAT AND GO THE OTHER WAY, THEN EVERY FOUR YEARS, IN THE EVENT THAT THERE IS A CHANGE TO COMPENSATION FOR THE MAYOR AND OR COUNCIL, THAT WILL HAVE TO BE A REFERENDUM.

IS THAT AM I CORRECT? CORRECT. AND THE ONLY REASON RIGHT NOW COUNCIL COULD SAY WE APPRECIATE YOUR RECOMMENDATION. BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE, WE'RE NOT GOING TO MAKE ANY CHANGES. AND THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR A REFERENDUM. WHICH I DON'T NECESSARILY AGREE WITH BECAUSE IT'S NEVER GONE TO REFERENDUM. AND I THINK WE NEED TO POSE THIS QUESTION TO THE VOTERS. SO I'M PURSUING THIS WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU ALL AGREED WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE. IT DOES HAVE AN INCREASE. BUT TO YOUR POINT AND TO WHAT MR. YOUNG SAID, YOU ARE CORRECT. WE COULD ESSENTIALLY YOU'D HAVE TO DRAFT BALLOT LANGUAGE, BUT YOU COULD HAVE THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION AND COUNCIL APPROVE IT BY ORDINANCE WITHOUT VOTER REFERENDUM, IF THAT LANGUAGE WAS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN THE CHARTER. WELL, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I THINK THE PROCESS HAS WORKED PRETTY GOOD SINCE THE CITY WAS FOUNDED, AND IF WE CAN CODIFY IT, THAT'D BE GREAT. AND AVOID EVERY FOUR YEARS IF THERE IS A CHANGE, HAVING TO CREATE A REFERENDUM. GOOD ENOUGH. THERE'S A CONSENSUS.

YES. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT YOU NEED. I WILL SAY, HERE'S THE HERE'S THE HERE'S THE DEVIL'S BARGAIN IN THAT, THAT THE TOTAL CYNIC'S GOING TO SAY, WELL, THEN THEY'RE JUST GOING TO POINT PEOPLE TO THE BLUE RIBBON IS GOING TO GIVE THEM A RAISE EVERY TIME. SO JUST SO YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S THE HEADWINDS THAT IT FACED FROM PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THAT WOULD BE THE CASE.

FOUNDED THE APPOINTEE. CORRECT. WHICH WE WILL SOON HAVE A PROCESS FOR. NONETHELESS, I STILL STAND BY WHAT I SAID. I THINK IT'S IT'S MORE REASONABLE AND AND IT'S A TRANSPARENT PROCESS. I DON'T THINK IT HASN'T BEEN AN ISSUE. I DON'T FORESEE IT BEING AN ISSUE. AND I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANYBODY SITTING UP HERE FOR ALL THE BIG CASH WE'RE MAKING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. JUST A FEW MORE THINGS. I JUST WANTED YOU TO BE AWARE. SORRY, BUT I APPRECIATE YOU INDULGING ME. SO, AIRPORT REGULATIONS, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES. AS YOU ALL KNOW, I LAID OUT A TIMELINE A COUPLE MEETINGS AGO IN WHICH ANDREW AND I ATTENDED THE NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY. ON NOVEMBER 20TH. WE RECEIVED FEEDBACK. WE'VE SET A FOLLOW UP MEETINGS WITH MR. BARR AND MR. KIRSCH JOINTLY TO TALK ABOUT SOME POTENTIAL FEDERAL PREEMPTIONS, ETC. SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT THE PRODUCT THAT WE PROCEED WITH AND PRESENT TO PLANNING BOARD IS THOROUGHLY VETTED THROUGH ALL THE APPROPRIATE CHANNELS AND ALL THE APPROPRIATE BOARDS, ETC. THAT BEING SAID, ALTHOUGH THE TIMELINE THAT WE LAID OUT INCLUDED US GOING TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD ON DECEMBER 11TH, I HAD TO MAKE A JUDGMENT CALL IN THAT THERE WAS SOME FEEDBACK THAT WE GOT BACK. AND I JUST WITH THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, THERE WAS NO WAY TO MEET THE PUBLISHING DEADLINE OF DECEMBER 11TH.

HOWEVER, THE GOAL I WORKED BACK FROM WAS HAVING FIRST READING ON JANUARY 21ST IN FRONT OF COUNCIL. SO THAT BEING SAID, WE ARE MOVING FORWARD WITH PRESENTING THE ORDINANCE AND CHANGES TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD ON JANUARY 14TH AND THEN FIRST READING TO CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 21ST. SO I WANTED YOU ALL TO KNOW THAT ALTHOUGH THE PLANNING BOARD CHANGED THE DATE, THAT COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE THESE FOR REVIEW AND DISCUSSION HAS NOT. BUT IN CASE YOU'RE WATCHING THE MEETING ON DECEMBER 11TH AND DON'T SEE IT, THAT'S WHY. RIGHT.

SO WE WILL BE PRESENTING IT JANUARY 14TH GIVES US PLENTY OF TIME TO WORK THROUGH THE VARIOUS MEETINGS AND REVIEWS THAT WE HAVE TO DO WITH THE VARIOUS PLAYERS INVOLVED, AND WORK WITH STAFF AND THEN PRESENT SOMETHING THAT WE BELIEVE IS A PRODUCT THAT EVERYONE HAS FULLY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON, AND THEN SO SEEING NO QUESTIONS, NO.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. I WON'T, NOT RIGHT NOW WHAT THE CONCERNS WERE PROPOSED. FROM WHOEVER OF THE PROCESS. YEAH, THAT WOULD DEFINITELY BE PART OF THE PRESENTATION. BUT YEAH, WE CAN MEET AS WELL ONCE I HAVE THOSE MEETINGS AND I THOROUGHLY DIGEST SOME OF THE POTENTIAL FEDERAL PREEMPTIONS AND WHETHER OR NOT OUR ATTORNEY ACTUALLY BELIEVES THOSE ARE FEDERAL

[02:50:03]

PREEMPTIONS, THEN HAPPY TO MEET AND DISCUSS WITH EACH OF YOU WHENEVER. OKAY. AND THEN LASTLY, ALSO DEALING WITH THE AIRPORT. AND I APPRECIATE THE VICE MAYOR BRINGING UP HB 4005. SO OBVIOUSLY THERE'S EMAILS THAT WENT AROUND AND WENT TO ITS FIRST COMMITTEE YESTERDAY. IT DID PASS. IT WAS VERY BRIEF FOUR MINUTE HEARING. I DO HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH OUR LOBBYISTS COMING UP, BUT I DID WANT TO JUST MENTION THAT THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY ACT, BECAUSE ME AND MR. YOUNG HAVE RECEIVED VARIOUS EMAILS THIS WEEK THAT NOT ALL OF YOU ARE COPIED ON FROM SOME MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT THINK FOR SOME REASON THAT I AM WORKING THINGS BEHIND A CLOSED DOOR THAT COUNCIL HAS NOT SEEN OR AGREED WITH, AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR, SINCE WE'RE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT NOW, THAT, AS YOU ALL KNOW, I ACTED AT THE PLEASURE OF A MAJORITY OF YOU. I BELIEVE THAT WHAT I AM DOING IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU'VE ASKED ME TO DO. I AM NOT AMENDING DOCUMENTS. I AM NOT PROPOSING CHANGES. I'M SIMPLY THE POINT PERSON FOR THE LOBBYIST THAT YOU ALL HAVE HIRED WHO IS UPDATING ME SO THAT I CAN UPDATE YOU BECAUSE I AM NOT IN TALLAHASSEE ACTUALLY LOBBYING THESE CHANGES OR THIS ACT OR OPPOSITION, ETC. THAT BEING SAID, WHEN YOU LOBBY, OBVIOUSLY OUR GOAL AS A CITY AND THE GOAL THAT I'VE ARTICULATED CLEARLY TO THE LOBBYISTS IS WE FULLY OBJECT TO THIS AND IN ENTIRETY. BUT THERE IS GOING TO COME A TIME WHERE WE ALL HAVE TO BE REALIST IN THIS SITUATION. IN MY OPINION, THE FORM THAT THIS IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN IS PRETTY MUCH FROM WHAT I'VE GATHERED FROM YOU.

WORST CASE SCENARIO, AND I UNDERSTAND WE WANT TO DEFEAT THIS, BUT IT WOULD BE NICE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT CHANGES, IF AT ALL, WOULD MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE PALATABLE, BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION, AND I PERSONALLY DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF COUNCIL IN THAT REGARD, NOR WOULD I EVER DO THAT. SO I KNOW WE ONLY HAVE A FEW MEETINGS LEFT THIS YEAR, BUT THESE COMMITTEES AND GOING THROUGH THE COMMITTEE'S WORK KIND OF QUICKLY. SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO DO THIS IN PUBLIC. I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WANT TO HANDLE IT, BUT I DO NEED SOMETHING BECAUSE, AGAIN, I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE MAKING THOSE DECISIONS FOR COUNCIL. I JUST KNOW WHAT I'VE HEARD FROM YOU ALL AT THE DAIS AND THE FORM THAT IT'S IN RIGHT NOW. IS HORRIBLE. SO ARE THERE THINGS THAT CAN MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE PALATABLE? UNDERSTANDING THAT THE OVERALL THEME IS TO DEFEAT THE DEFEAT IT IN ITS ENTIRETY. SO I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE GO WITH THAT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO MENTION IT BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT NOW THAT IT MOVED THROUGH ITS FIRST COMMITTEE. SO I AM ADAMANTLY THAT I OBJECT TO THIS IN ITS ENTIRETY. THIS HAS BECOME AND IS A POLITICAL TOOL AND RHETORIC OF THE FACT THAT THIS COUNCIL HAS OVERREACHED ITS AUTHORITY, AND IT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE. AND YOU'RE TRYING TO CLARIFY A PROCESS WHILE THEY ARE TRYING TO A GROUP SAYING THAT WE HAVE OVERREACH. IF ANYTHING, WE'VE BEEN NEGLIGENT IN PAYING ATTENTION TO OUR OWN DUTIES, IN MY OPINION. SO I'M NOT WILLING TO NEGOTIATE ANYTHING. ON THIS BASED ON THE REASONS THAT WERE GIVEN FOR THIS ENABLING ACT TO BE CHANGED, BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN RECKLESS IN APPOINTING PEOPLE WHEN THE PROCESS OF APPOINTING PEOPLE HAS ALWAYS BEEN POLITICAL, IT JUST ALWAYS HAS. AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY DON'T GET PEOPLE THAT THEY WANT, OR THEY BLAME IT ON THE FACT THAT. TWO MEMBERS SAID THEY DIDN'T WANT TO TAKE GRANTS. HOWEVER, THEY HAVE AN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THAT'S RESPONSIBLE ENOUGH TO SAY, IF I HAVE TO TAKE GRANTS FOR SAFETY ISSUES, I'M GOING TO TAKE GRANTS. SO IT BECAME TO ME A POLITICAL FOOTBALL THAT IS NOT WORTH ANY NEGOTIATIONS. THIS I THINK THAT THIS COUNCIL IN THE PAST HAS PICKED THEIR CANDIDATES FOR WHATEVER POLITICAL WILL ON WHATEVER SIDE, AND THERE'S NO GOOD REASON, IN

[02:55:02]

MY OPINION, FOR CHANGING ANYTHING TO WHAT THEY WANT TO CHANGE. THERE'S NO LOGIC, THERE'S NO REASONING THAT THEY'VE GIVEN. AND IF IF ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBER CAN GIVE ME A REASON THAT THIS IS HAPPENING AND ANYTHING THEY WOULD AGREE TO, I THINK THEY NEED TO DO IT NOW BECAUSE WE WE HAVE PEOPLE LOBBYING IF THEY'RE GOING TO NEGOTIATE FOR US AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY'RE NEGOTIATING ON. SO KRAMER AND THEN KRISEMAN, I JUST WANT TO I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, AND I AGREE. I THINK IT'S A TERRIBLE OVERREACH AND VIOLATION OF HOME RULE AND ALL THAT IS TRUE. MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, SO JUST ASSUMING WE ALL TAKE THAT POSITION, WE ARE ENTRENCHED AND WE WILL NOT. WHAT DO YOU THINK'S GOING TO HAPPEN NEXT? WELL, THAT'S WHY WE HIRED ANOTHER ATTORNEY TO TELL US WHAT OUR OPTIONS ARE. AND UNFORTUNATELY. WE'RE GOING TO PROTECT OUR HOME RULE. UNDERSTAND. THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S YES, WE WANT TO PROTECT HOME RULE. THAT STILL DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION BECAUSE THE REALITY IS THIS IN TALKING TO OUR REPRESENTATIVES, TALK TO SEVERAL OF THEM. EVERYBODY AGREES. YEAH, WE WISH WE DIDN'T HAVE TO DO THIS. THAT'S KIND OF THE MINDSET. YEAH, THIS IS TERRIBLE. BUT WE FEEL LIKE WE HAVE NO CHOICE BECAUSE OF MISMANAGEMENT. NOW, I DON'T AGREE WITH THAT. YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THAT. NONETHELESS. AS ONE OF OUR REPRESENTATIVES TOLD ME, EVERYBODY'S GOT A BOSS AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO LIKE IT. OH, BUT IT'S TRUE. AND SO ARE WE'RE GOING TO WHEN THIS BILL PASSES AND WE DON'T, AND WE WIND UP WITH PEOPLE FROM THE COUNTY ON THIS BEING APPOINTED TURNS INTO A GENERAL ELECTION WITH ALL THE PAC MONEY INVOLVED AND ALL THIS INSANITY THAT CAN ENSUE. IN ANY INFLUENCE WE COULD HAVE HAD. ARE WE GOING TO.

I'M JUST ASKING, ARE WE GOING TO ABDICATE IT? ANY INFLUENCE WE COULD HAVE IN MAKING SOMETHING LESS ABUSIVE OR NOT? AND IF WE AS A BODY IS, THE MAJORITY SAYS, YEAH, WE'RE NOT GOING TO. WE'RE NOT GOING TO. TRY TO INFLUENCE THIS OTHER THAN TO SAY WE COMPLETELY OPPOSE IT. OKAY, THERE YOU GO. IN MY I AM SPEAKING FROM A IN MY ARENA. I WAS IN FOOTBALL AND NOW FOOTBALL FANS, EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT HOW TERRIBLE THE CALENDAR IS AND NIL IS AND THE PORTAL IS AND ALL THESE A NUMBER OF FACTORS HAD TO DO WITH MY SPORT THAT WE SOMETIMES TOOK SIMILAR VIEWS, AND THEN PEOPLE WHO HAD NOTHING REALLY TO DO WITH IT MADE DECISIONS FOR US THAT WE HAD NO IMPACT ON. AND I WAS SAYING, HEY GUYS, THIS IS COMING DOWN THE ROAD.

WE BETTER WE BETTER DO SOMETHING TO TRY TO MITIGATE THIS TERRIBLE THING. BUT WE DIDN'T. AND SO IT WAS IMPOSED UPON US. THERE WAS NOTHING WE COULD DO ABOUT IT. AND SO THAT IS PEOPLE ARE LIVING THAT RIGHT NOW. KIDS IN HIGH SCHOOL OR WHATEVER, LIVING IN THAT WORLD.

SO I SAY THAT TO SAY, JUST AND I THE MAJORITY IS WHATEVER. AND I'M NOT TELLING YOU I KNOW THE ANSWERS, BUT I AM TELLING YOU WHAT'S HAPPENING, WHAT'S PROPOSED NOW, I THINK IS WORST CASE SCENARIO. I THINK IT CAN BE IMPROVED UPON. IT STILL WON'T BE PALATABLE. I MEAN, IT'S STILL GOING TO TASTE. IT'S GOING TO BE TERRIBLE. AND I THINK IT'S REALLY BAD IDEA.

I'VE TOLD THEM ALL THAT, BUT IF IT'S PROBABLY NOT RELEVANT. SO I'M LISTENING TO MY COLLEAGUE TALK ME INTO SOMETHING. TALK ME INTO. YEAH, I JUST I WANT TO GO THROUGH. BUT I'LL JUST SAY BASED ON HOME RULE, EGREGIOUS TAKE TWO 5180 THE ENABLING ACT LOT SPLITS LIVE LOCAL. THEY THEY'VE TAKEN AWAY MORE THAN JUST THIS ISSUE. I AGREE 100% SO THAT NONETHELESS ARE WE GOING TO. YES. BUT I'M JUST THAT STILL DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A CHOICE TO MAKE, WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO. DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD NEGOTIATE, THEN? I WOULD DEFINITELY SAY THAT WE DON'T WANT ANYBODY FROM THE COUNTY ON IT. LET'S START THERE. AND THEY DON'T HAVE TO HAVE AVIATION EXPERIENCE. I THINK THOSE ARE TWO. IF HAVING APPOINTED PEOPLE, WE GOT TO FIND PEOPLE WITH AVIATION EXPERIENCE RIGHT NOW, THERE WILL BE A TIME WHEN WE REACH HOMEOSTASIS WITH THE AIRPORT, AND IT'S NOT

[03:00:02]

CONTROVERSIAL LIKE IT IS. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GOING TO BE 30, 40, WHATEVER IT'S GOING TO BE YEARS FROM NOW, AND THEN IT MAY BECOME VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND PEOPLE THAT HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR FOR THE BOARD. SO I'M NOT JUST THINKING ABOUT FOR NOW, BUT I'M THINKING DOWN THE ROAD TOO, BECAUSE EVENTUALLY THIS WILL REACH HOMEOSTASIS NOW.

BUT I AND BECAUSE IT'S OUR, OUR PROPERTY THAT WE OWN AND BECAUSE WE'VE RUN IT AS LONG AS WE HAVE AND BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN BY ALL ACCOUNTS, I'VE READ THE LETTER, IT'S BEEN MANAGED INCREDIBLY WELL. I WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT AS CLOSE TO WHAT EXISTS NOW AS POSSIBLE. AS SOON AS COUNTY FOLKS GET INVOLVED, THEN COUNTY PARKS GET INVOLVED. AND IF WE CAN AT LEAST ELIMINATE THAT, I THINK THAT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE ALREADY. COUNTY IMPACT I KNOW BELIEVE YOU. THANK YOU. BUT OKAY, LET'S SEE IF WE CAN GO. CHRIS. AND THEN PETRANOFF. WELL, I THINK.

YOU KNOW, HERE WE ARE AGAIN WITH OUR FAVORITE TOPIC. COMING ON THE FIRST HOUR OF COMMUNICATIONS CONVERSATION ON OUR FAVORITE SUBJECT. I THINK EVERY TIME WE TRY TO TALK ABOUT THIS AS A GROUP, WE WE MAKE IT HARDER FOR OURSELVES IN TERMS OF THE PEOPLE WE HAVE TO WORK WITH OR TRY TO PERSUADE. AND SO I, I, I THINK IT IS. NOT VERY PRODUCTIVE WITH SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT GET MADE PAST MEETINGS AND, WELL, THIS MEETING LET ME FINISH. I'VE ONLY HAD THE FLOOR FOR 30S. THE THE QUESTION IS THAT MR. MCCONNELL RAISED WAS HOW DO YOU WANT TO HOW DO YOU WANT TO? HOW DOES COUNCIL WISH TO COMMUNICATE WITH HIM ON THIS? AS OUR POINT MAN? AND I THINK HAVING THESE GROUP CONVERSATIONS HAS A LIMITED IMPACT. IT HAS LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS AND PRODUCTIVITY. I THINK THIS IS WHY WE'VE HIRED A LOBBYIST. THE LOBBYIST IS OUR LOBBYIST, GRAY ROBINSON, ARE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT SO SUPPOSED TO COMMUNICATE OUR POINT OF VIEW. AND WE'RE UNITED IN SAYING, WE WE WE DO NOT SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION, AND WE WISH IT TO BE THAT THE PAUSE BUTTON BE BE HIT ON IT OR IT NOT PASS. BUT THEY'RE ALSO THERE TO TELL US ABOUT WHAT THE ART OF THE POSSIBLE IS AND WHERE THE OPPORTUNITIES MIGHT BE IF IT'S GOING TO MOVE FORWARD. WHAT WHAT OUR OPTIONS AND CHOICES ARE. AND SO I THINK THAT THE MORE PRODUCTIVE WAY TO PROCEED IS FOR MR. MCCONNELL, WITH INPUT FROM OUR LOBBYIST, IS TO HAVE INDIVIDUAL CONVERSATIONS WITH US AND TO GET OUR OUR FEEDBACK AND IDEAS IN THAT REGARD. I THINK THAT'S ALREADY BEEN HAPPENING TO SOME DEGREE. I AND, AND AND SEE THAT THROUGH THAT, WHETHER THERE IS SOME SORT OF A CONSENSUS. THAT THAT THAT EMERGES AND THERE MAY BE THERE MAY NOT BE. AND ALSO, AS THIS BILL CONTINUES THROUGH THE TRAPS, AND BOTH BEFORE THE SESSION ACTUALLY BEGINS IN MID-JANUARY AND AFTERWARDS. SO I THINK WE JUST HAVE TO RELY HEAVILY ON OUR LOBBYIST AND THEIR INTELLIGENCE AND AND OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS OF THIS BE ABLE TO REACT TO THIS.

BUT I THINK WE SHOULD BE THE DISCUSSIONS WE HAVE AS A GROUP HERE. COLLECTIVELY, WE SHOULD BE. YOU KNOW, TRY TO HAVE THOSE BE MANAGED VERY CAREFULLY SO THAT WE'RE PERHAPS ULTIMATELY WE WILL NEED TO, IN THIS SETTING ON THE DAIS, REACH A CONSENSUS. BUT TO HAVE IT BE A LONG, RAMBLING CONVERSATION WITH COMMENTS MADE THAT OFTEN MAY BE TAKEN FAIRLY OR UNFAIRLY, IN A NEGATIVE WAY BY OTHER PARTIES, IS NOT PRODUCTIVE. SO THE QUESTION IS WHAT IN THE ENABLING ACT, IF ANYTHING, ARE YOU WILLING TO NEGOTIATE? AND MAYOR, I THINK THAT IS A.

[03:05:01]

YOU'VE ALREADY SAID NOTHING APPARENTLY. RIGHT. THAT'S MY OPINION. THAT'S YOUR OPINION.

SO I, I THINK THAT IT'S IT'S ALREADY FOR EXAMPLE, I ALREADY GOT A. A I THINK SEVERAL OF US DID GOT A COMMUNICATION FROM REPRESENTATIVE BOTANA SAYING. IF YOU HAVE LANGUAGE ON HOW THE QUALIFICATION SECTION OF THE BILL COULD BE CHANGED AND IMPROVED, LET ME KNOW. AND YOU KNOW, I, I DIDN'T RESPOND SPECIFICALLY TO THAT. BUT THE POINT IS, IF YOU. THE DIFFICULT POSITION WE'VE BEEN PUT IN IS IF YOU START NEGOTIATING ON INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS OF THE BILL, WHEN YOUR POSITION IS IS THAT WE DO NOT SUPPORT THE BILL AND WE DO NOT WANT TO SEE IT MOVE FORWARD, YOU'RE IN EFFECT, NEGOTIATING AGAINST YOURSELF. YOU KNOW, LET'S BE CANDID. AND FOR US TO BE ASKED ON THIS DAIS, ESPECIALLY PUBLICLY, TO SAY, WELL, WHAT IF, YOU KNOW, IF THIS IF YOU KNEW THIS BILL WAS GOING TO PASS NEXT WEEK, YOU KNOW, WHAT, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO AGREE TO CHANGE ON IT? THAT KNOWING THAT IT'S GOING TO PASS ANYWAY, AT THIS POINT, I DON'T KNOW IF THE BILL'S GOING TO PASS OR NOT. AND SO IT'S THIS IS NOT A THIS IS NOT A MATTER THAT A PUBLIC NEGOTIATION IS USED FOR PRODUCTIVE WITH. AND THAT'S THE BASIC POINT I'M MAKING. OKAY, I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. AND I WILL JUST SAY THIS. IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ATTORNEY TO TO DISCUSS IT WITHOUT TRANSPARENCY AND DECIDE THAT HE HAS FOUR VOTES ONE WAY OR FOUR VOTES THE OTHER WAY. I DON'T TRUST THAT PROCESS, AND HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD TO THAT AT ALL. SO TO DO THAT, MAY I SAY SOMETHING? ABOUT WHAT I JUST SAID ABOUT WHAT YOU AND COUNCIL MEMBER KRISEMAN JUST SAID? YES. SO I THINK AND I PROBABLY COULD HAVE WORDED IT BETTER, BUT I THINK COUNCIL MEMBERS KRISEMAN'S POINT OF THE QUESTION I WAS ASKING IS ACCURATE. DO YOU WANT TO DISCUSS THIS PUBLICLY, OR WOULD YOU PREFER TO JUST CALL ME, WHICH, YOU KNOW, I HAVE CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS WITH ALL OF YOU, AND I'M NOT GOING TO SAY WHAT WE DISCUSSED, BUT SOME OF THESE CONVERSATIONS CAN OCCUR OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE, BECAUSE THAT'S NOT TRANSPARENT, MR. MCCONNELL, THAT THAT IS SAYING THAT YOU'RE GOING TO MEET, TALK TO THEM ON THE STRATEGY, AND THEN I'M GOING TO WATCH IT AND AND FIND OUT WHAT THE STRATEGY WAS. CAN WE DO IT IN EXECUTIVE AND THEN IT'S RECORDED? NO, WE CAN'T UNFORTUNATELY I'VE ASKED I'M SURE WE CANNOT DO WE CANNOT. WE'RE NOT ISN'T IT STRATEGY. WE'RE NOT IN. YEAH. BUT WE HAVE TO BE NAMED NAMED IN A LAWSUIT AGAIN. THEN WHAT? WHY DON'T WE DO THIS THEN? IF IF EVERYONE WANTS TO HAVE IT, HAVE IT HAPPEN IN PUBLIC, THEN WHY DON'T I WORK WITH MR. YOUNG? WE'LL PUBLISH SOMETHING ON DECEMBER 10TH, AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT WHATEVER YOU GUYS WANT ON DECEMBER 10TH. AND YOU CAN PROVIDE ME. YOU CAN PROVIDE ME COMMENTS, AND WE CAN HAVE ALREADY STARTED. I'VE BEEN SO ADAMANT WE CAN'T BE BEHIND THE EIGHT BALL. THEY ALREADY HAD A SESSION AND WE ALREADY I MEAN, THEY ALREADY SPOKE YESTERDAY ON OUR BEHALF. HIGH FIVES AND EVERYTHING. SO YOU KNOW I DON'T TIME IS OF ESSENCE. MAYOR WHO SPOKE OR DID YOU WATCH YESTERDAY. I KNOW THERE WAS A COMMITTEE HEARING AND OUR AND OUR AND OUR LOBBYISTS. I DIDN'T WATCH IT. I DIDN'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WATCH IT. SO. OKAY, SO YOU DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS IT IN PUBLIC? I WANT TO DISCUSS IT IN PUBLIC. COUNCIL MEMBER KRAMER HAS TWO THINGS THAT HE JUST IS ADAMANTLY OPPOSED TO. SO I'LL MOVE ON. WE DON'T NEED TO NEGOTIATE HOW WE CAN COME TO SOME KIND OF CONSENSUS. THEN I, I HAVE PETRANOFF AND THEN VICE MAYOR.

OKAY, ONE QUESTION IS, CAN WE BE A PLAINTIFF AND HAVE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION UNLESS WE'RE SUING, CAN WE IF WE ARE NAMED IN A LAWSUIT, WHETHER WE ARE ON ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER, THEN WE CAN HAVE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION ON TWO THINGS TO DISCUSS. TWO THINGS SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS OR STRATEGY RELATED TO LITIGATION EXPENDITURES, PERIOD. THAT'S WHAT THE STATUTE SAYS.

[03:10:01]

EVERY OTHER DISCUSSION THAT WE HAVE ON ANYTHING ELSE HAPPENS IN THE PUBLIC. OKAY. SO WE WOULD EITHER NEED TO HAVE A PRIVATE OR PUBLIC. IN TERMS OF. WHAT WE WOULD WHAT WE WOULD NEGOTIATE, BECAUSE WE'RE THERE'S MULTIPLE PATHS WE CAN GO DOWN, WHICH INCLUDE, YOU KNOW, LOOKING AT OUR LEGAL, WHAT OUR RIGHTS ARE, AS WELL AS LOBBYING. I THINK THAT FOR ME, THE MOST DAMNING THING, IT'S NOT AT ALL THE QUALIFICATIONS ON WHO'S ON THE BOARD. I THINK THAT'S JUST A NONSENSICAL THING THAT YOU WOULD YOU WOULD WANT A ROBUST BOARD THAT DOESN'T I THINK THEY WOULD WANT TO, YOU KNOW, THINK ABOUT THAT AND REMOVE THAT. ANYWAY, NO BOARD HAS SUCH A HOMOGENEOUS REQUIREMENT OR IT DOESN'T FUNCTION PROPERLY. SO BUT THAT WAS THAT WAS SORT OF A GIVE ME AND YOU COULD TELL IT WAS A GIVE ME. WHEN THE FORMER NA MEMBER CAME IN DURING THE LEGISLATIVE, YOU KNOW, MEETING AND SORT OF THREW THAT OUT THERE. SO THAT WAS SOMETHING PRE-PLANNED. AND THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT. I THINK THAT IS THE THE EASY SACRIFICE FOR THEM TO MAKE. I THINK THE MOST IMPACTFUL FOR US IS THE FACT THAT THE COUNTY IS VOTING ON THIS. AND AND THESE ARE COUNTY PEOPLE VOTING ON AIRPORT. THAT IS IT'S ON OUR PROPERTY. IT IS OUR IT WOULD BE LIKE NORTHERN FLORIDIANS VOTING ON THE GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA BECAUSE THEY'RE NEARBY AND THEY'RE PARTIALLY IMPACTED BY, YOU KNOW, THEIR ROADS, ETCETERA. SO I LIKEN IT TO THAT. AND AND UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE THERE, WE'RE 5% OF THE POPULATION THERE. SO WE MIGHT AS WELL FROM PORT ROYAL TO GSAC, WE MIGHT AS WELL JUST CHECK OUT BECAUSE WE WILL BE IRRELEVANT AND THERE WILL BE BIG PAC MONEY MOVING IN THERE. SO FOR ME IT'S IT'S WHO WHO GETS TO PICK WHO'S ON THE NA. YOU KNOW, I DON'T LIKE THIS WHOLE, THIS WHOLE LEGISLATION JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. BUT IF WE HAVE TO RACK AND STACK FOR SOMETHING TO GIVE TO LOBBYISTS, IT WOULD DEFINITELY NOT BE THE QUALIFICATIONS BECAUSE THEY'VE WHEN THEY THINK ABOUT THAT, THEY SHOULD DO THAT ANYWAY. IT WOULD BE MORE ALONG THE LINE OF WHO GETS TO VOTE. AND I JUST SENT YOU A POWERPOINT DOCUMENT THAT I THINK IN POWERPOINT. SO ON WHAT I WOULD DO IN THE ORDER OF SEQUENCE AND WHAT IS THE MOST DAMAGING TO THE LEAST DAMAGING. SO THAT'S ALL MY COMMENT. THANK YOU. IF I MAY, MAYOR, I WOULD IF WE HAVE TO RANK THEM. I AGREE 100% WITH YOU. THE MOST COMPELLING PART IS THAT THE CITY SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS AND NOT THE COUNTY. IT IS NOT THE QUALIFICATION THAT IT SEEMS ABSURD RIGHT ON ITS OWN. BUT YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT, AND IT'S ODD TO THINK ABOUT THE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION OF THE COUNTY THAT WE ARE, AND ALSO THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE THAT WE ARE FOR THE COUNTY. 27%.

YEAH. SO ANYWAY, IT'S IT'S I AGREE WITH YOU 100%. I'M SORRY. YOU KNOW, AND I WOULD SAY THAT MY PRIVATE PRIVATE, MY PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS WITH MR. MCCONNELL TO OUR LOBBYISTS TO CONVEY TO OUR LOBBYIST HAS BEEN VERY SIMILAR IN TERMS OF IF THE LEGISLATURE IS ULTIMATELY BOUND AND DETERMINED TO CHANGE THIS FROM AN APPOINTIVE TO AN ELECTORAL PROCESS, THEN LET THE CITY VOTERS VOTE. MAYOR, IF I WANT TO ADD ONE THING BECAUSE THIS IS IMPORTANT, I THINK THE REASON THE MAYOR DOES NOT WANT OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO SPEAK WITH US INDIVIDUALLY IS NOT BECAUSE HE DOESN'T TRUST OUR CITY ATTORNEY IMPLICITLY, IT'S BECAUSE OF THEIR THAT WAS JUST A THAT'S A PLACE FOR OTHERS WHO AREN'T GOING TO GET THEIR WAY ON WHICHEVER SIDE THEY ARE OF IT. TO SAY THIS WAS DONE INAPPROPRIATELY, THAT'S ALL TO TO CAST ASPERSIONS ON ON THAT PROCESS AND ON OUR CITY ATTORNEY IN PARTICULAR. I, I DON'T WANT ANYBODY TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT EITHER. SO BECAUSE WE TRUST HIM IMPLICITLY THAT HE COULD MEET WITH US INDIVIDUALLY AND THEN HAVE THE CONSENSUS AND IT WOULD BE REAL. YEAH. I'M NOT, I'M NOT, I WASN'T IN I'M NOT SAYING THAT I DON'T THINK THAT'S HIS POSITION TO HAVE TO DO THAT. I DON'T WANT TO PUT HIM IN THAT POSITION. THAT'S RIGHT. I DON'T THINK HE'D WANT TO BE IN THAT POSITION. RIGHT.

THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S EXACTLY MY POINT, RIGHT? BUT I'M REMISS IN NOT SAYING WHAT ARE THE POINTS THAT THEY'VE ASKED FOR SO THAT IT'S ON THE RECORD. WHAT ARE THE. REQUESTS WITHIN THIS AMENDMENT? DO WE HAVE THOSE EVEN AT THE TOP OF OUR HEADS? I MEAN, WE'RE ALL FOCUSED IN ON WE DON'T WANT VOTING AND WE DON'T WANT WHAT ARE THE THE POINTS THAT THEY ARE GOING FOR IT. I'M ASSUMING THAT THIS IS QUESTIONS DIRECTED TO ME. SO THEY'RE NOT GOING FOR ANYTHING

[03:15:05]

THAT THE POINT OF ME BRINGING THIS UP WAS EXACTLY WHAT YOU ALL HAVE SAID IS NO, I'M SORRY.

THE LET ME CLARIFY BEFORE YOU GO DOWN THAT WHAT IN THE ENABLING ACT IS BEING ASKED TO BE CHANGED. SO WE'RE ALL CLEAR. NOTHING IS BEING ASKED TO BE CHANGED. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO TELL ME THAT RIGHT NOW IT'S AS WORST AS IT COULD GO, BUT IT WOULD. WHAT HAS BEEN PUT FORWARD FOR CHANGES TO THE ENABLING ACT? NOTHING, MAYOR. HE'S LIKE THE WHOLE POINT IS TO DIRECT OUR LOBBYISTS TO SAY, HEY, IF THIS IS GOING TO MOVE FORWARD, PLEASE AT LEAST LOBBY THESE CHANGES. WHAT IS MOVING FORWARD? THE ENTIRE ACT IN ITS CURRENT FORM THAT JUST WENT TO THE COMMITTEE, THERE ARE SPECIFIC CHANGES THAT ARE IN THAT ACT I'M TRYING TO PUT OUT.

OKAY. SO FOR SO WHAT IT DOES BECAUSE CURRENTLY THE ACT ALLOWS YOU ALL TO APPOINT BY AFFIRMATIVE VOTE. WHAT THE ACT DOES IS THEY WILL NO LONGER BE AN APPOINTED BOARD. THEY WILL BE ELECTED BY THE COUNTY AT LARGE. TWO MEMBERS WILL BE COUNTY RESIDENTS. THREE MEMBERS WILL BE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY. THAT'S THAT'S SUCCINCT AS I CAN PROVIDE, THERE'S ONE MORE QUALIFICATION PURSUANT TO STATUTE FOR AERONAUTICAL. ANYTHING ELSE? NO. I'LL GO AHEAD WHILE YOU'RE LOOKING AT THAT. AND. YOU ARE OKAY. WHO IS NEXT? I'M SORRY, VICE MAYOR.

OKAY. I JUST WANT TO GET THIS READ INTO THE RECORD. SO I SUPPORT VIGOROUSLY FIGHTING ANY CHANGE TO THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY OF THE NAPLES CITY COUNCIL. THAT MEANS NO TO HB 4005 OR ANY VARIATION THEREOF. I BELIEVE WE SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY MEMBER OF OUR CITY STAFF OR ANY ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE CITY OF NAPLES NEGOTIATING ANY ELEMENT. OF THIS ATTEMPT TO HIJACK OUR AUTHORITY. NOW, I'M GOING TO REMIND YOU THAT THE. KATHLEEN PASSIDOMO AND THREE OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR COLLIER COUNTY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION, THEY'RE NAMED INDIVIDUALS WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT. MR. REPRESENTATIVE BOTANA BENAROCH AND LAUREN MARLOW. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT, THEY VOTED 4 TO 0 TO MAKE THE NAPLES AIRPORT AND AUTHORITY INDEPENDENT OF THE NAPLES CITY COUNCIL. SO THAT'S THEIR INTENT, RIGHT? IT'S NOT NICE. IT'S IT'S THEIR INTENT. THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO. WE HAVE HIRED A CITY. WE'VE HIRED AN ATTORNEY TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHT TO RETAIN OUR APPOINTING AUTHORITY. SO IF ANYONE AND THIS IS ME, I'M ONE OF SEVEN. IF ANYONE ATTEMPTS TO NEGOTIATE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, YOU SHOULD BE ON NOTICE THAT YOU MAY BE UNDERMINING THE ABILITY OF THE CITY TO DEFEND OUR ARGUMENT OF HOME RULE IN THE COURTS. HERE WE HAVE AN ATTORNEY THAT WE'VE HIRED TO DEFEND OURSELVES, BUT YET WE'RE WE'RE NOW BEING TEMPTED TO ENTER NEGOTIATIONS ON SOMETHING THAT WE SAID WE'RE GOING TO FIGHT. SO THAT THAT REALLY RUBS ME THE WRONG WAY. IT MAKES IT IT PUTS, IN MY OPINION, AND THIS IS ME, PUTS US IN LEGAL JEOPARDY OF DOING ONE THING ON ONE HAND AND THEN TRYING TO CRAFT SOMETHING ON THE OTHER. THAT PROBABLY IS GOING TO GET PASSED. AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE WE POTENTIALLY WOULD HAVE A SAY IN IT. NO, I, I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU GUYS FIGHT, BUT THAT'S NOT THE WAY I FIGHT AND I DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANY PART OF IT. BUT IF IF ONE OF US, IF WE'VE BEEN IN INVOLVED IN NEGOTIATION, THEN SHAME ON US. WE'RE I DON'T THINK THAT THIS COUNCIL HAS APPROVED OR AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO GO NEGOTIATE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL WITH HB 4005. FURTHERMORE, ANY SO-CALLED NEGOTIATIONS BY ANY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR FULL ACCOUNTABILITY AS TO EVERY

[03:20:01]

DETAIL OF THE NEGOTIATION DISCUSSION AND INCLUDES STEP BY STEP HOW THAT DISCUSSION STARTED, WHO WAS INVOLVED, WHAT WAS OFFERED AT EACH STEP, AND SPECIFICALLY HOW THE NEGOTIATED ITEM WAS AMENDED, WHY IT WAS AMENDED, AND BY WHAT AUTHORITY. IN OTHER WORDS, WHEN THE SUNSHINE, IF AND WHEN THE SUNSHINE SHINES ON THIS, IT NEEDS TO BE CRYSTAL CLEAR WHO DID WHAT AND WHEN AND WHY. WHAT WAS OFFERED. WHAT DID YOU CHANGE? BECAUSE UNLESS IT'S IN THE SUNSHINE AND WE CONDUCT BUSINESS THE WAY THAT WE NORMALLY DO BUSINESS, THEN THERE'S ALL CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT WILL DEVELOP. SO LET'S ELIMINATE THAT AND BE VERY CRYSTAL CLEAR ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON. CONSOLIDATION OF OUR COMMENTS TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY AND THEN CONSOLIDATING THOSE. REMEMBER WE CAN'T WE CAN'T TALK TO EACH OTHER. RIGHT. WE IF THAT WOULD BE A DISCUSSION WITH OUR CITY ATTORNEY AND THEN THAT BEING CONSOLIDATED AND FORMED INTO A POSITION AND NEGOTIATION POSITION, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THAT'S APPROPRIATE. INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY DOES NOT EQUATE TO DIRECTION UNLESS IT MEETS THE DEFINITION FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION. AND I THINK WE JUST HEARD FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THAT. AND AGAIN, ANY SUCH FEEDBACK SHOULD BE WELL DOCUMENTED, WELL DOCUMENTED, AND BE CONSISTENT WITH FLORIDA SUNSHINE LAW. THESE ARE SERIOUS MATTERS. I SAY WE MADE THE RIGHT DECISION HIRING AN ATTORNEY AND LOBBYIST. THE INTENT OF OUR COLLIER COUNTY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION, AND STRIPPING THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY FROM THE CITY COUNCIL IS APPARENT. THAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON. SO LET THEM RUN THEIR COURSE WITH IT AND AND THEN LET THE LEGAL PROCESS RUN. SO THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU. MEMBER. YEAH. SO MY QUESTION I GUESS IS TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY. DO WE KNOW YET TO THE TO THE WE ARE NOT PARTICIPATING. IN ANY NEGOTIATION POINT. DO WE KNOW YET WHETHER THE AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF NAPLES, ASSUMING THIS GOES THROUGH AND GETS AMENDED, WHICH EVERYTHING INDICATES, THAT'S GOING TO BE THE CASE. DO WE HAVE A LEGAL WHATEVER CAN WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE? DO WE REALLY NEED THAT? LIKE WHAT? BECAUSE MY I'M I'M OPERATING UNDER THE ASSUMPTION IS THE LEGISLATURE CREATED THIS AND THEY CAN AMEND IT HOWEVER THEY WANT TO. AND THEN THERE'S NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT. IF THAT'S NOT THE CASE, YOU CAN ALWAYS SUE ANYBODY. BUT THE ODDS OF US, OTHER THAN GETTING OTHER FOLKS ELECTED AND THEM GOING AND CHANGING IT AGAIN, WHAT ARE OTHER LEGAL OPTIONS AND WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT? SINCE WE'RE DOING THIS ALL IN SUNSHINE? I HAVE TO YEAH. BUT I MEAN, AND WE CAN FIRST OFF, THEY'RE STILL BEING LOOKED AT BECAUSE REMEMBER THE DIRECTION WAS TO TWOFOLD HIGHER MR. COLE FROM WHY SIROTA AND THEN JASON UNGER AND JOSEPH SALZBERG FROM GRAYROBINSON. BUT TO THOSE QUESTIONS CURRENTLY, I CAN SAY THAT HE'S WORKING ON IT, MR. COLE, TO REVIEW THEM. HOWEVER, IN NO WAY WILL I DISCUSS OUR POTENTIAL LEGAL ACTIONS THAT HAVE NOT OCCURRED YET IN PUBLIC BEFORE THEY HAPPEN. EVER. AND WHEN WILL WE HAVE THOSE APPROXIMATELY. THEY KNOW WE'RE ON A SHOT CLOCK, RIGHT? AGAIN, I'VE GOTTEN THEY DO, THEY DO.

BUT THE LEGAL ACTIONS THAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO POTENTIALLY MAY OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OCCUR UNTIL AFTER SOMETHING IS FORMALLY ADOPTED. SO I RECOGNIZE THAT. BUT STILL THEY NEED TO KNOW WHAT OUR POWER IS. YEAH. WHAT IF THERE'S ACTUALLY A COURSE. AND HE JUST SAID THAT THOUGH HE AND I MEAN VIABLE I MEAN VIABLE RECOURSE. NO ONE'S GOING TO GUARANTEE ANYTHING.

BUT I'LL JUST REITERATE MY ANSWER, WHICH IS THE PERSON THAT YOU AUTHORIZED ME TO BRING BACK TO YOU, THAT YOU AUTHORIZED THE CITY ENGAGE IS WORKING ON THE ANSWERS TO THOSE QUESTIONS THAT I WILL NOT MAKE PUBLICLY, THAT I WILL NOW NOT ANNOUNCE AT A PUBLIC MEETING.

OKAY. BUT I THINK AT THIS POINT, WITH YOU ALL BEING THE COUNCIL THAT I'VE WORKED WITH FOR AT LEAST THE LAST 17 MONTHS SINCE I WAS APPOINTED, THE MOMENT I GET UPDATES, YOU ALL GET UPDATES ON EVERYTHING THAT I'M INVOLVED IN. SO IF YOU HAVEN'T GOTTEN AN UPDATE YET, IT'S BECAUSE THERE'S NOTHING TO PROVIDE. BUT THE MOMENT I GET SOMETHING, I WILL MAKE SURE

[03:25:04]

THAT EACH ONE OF YOU KNOW, AS I ALWAYS DO WITH EVERYTHING. CAN WE PUSH HIM FOR DELIVERABLE? HE SO SO AGAIN, THINK ABOUT WHAT WE'RE SAYING AND THEN THINK ABOUT WHY WE WOULD WANT SOMETHING IN WRITING THAT'S A PUBLIC RECORD. SO WHEN YOU SAY A DELIVERABLE, THE DELIVERABLE I'VE ALREADY CONFIRMED WILL BE SOMETHING THAT I WILL PROVIDE TO YOU IN A FORMAT THAT I THINK IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT AND VIABLE FOR THE TOPIC BEING DISCUSSED. I'M JUST THINKING OF WHEN, YOU KNOW, CAN WE BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE YOU'RE TALKING WE WERE TALKING ABOUT LOBBYING AND YOU KNOW, WHAT KIND OF THINGS WOULD BE POWERFUL, WOULD BE PART OF A NEGOTIATION OR GOOD NEGOTIATION IS, YOU KNOW, WHERE YOUR POWER LIES AND YOU KNOW WHAT POTENTIAL OPTIONS ARE, WHICH WE HAVE NONE. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THOSE ARE YET. IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL TO HAVE IT SOONER THAN LATER, EVEN IF IT'S VERBAL IN WHATEVER FORMAT. MAINTAINS CONFIDENTIALITY. AND AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING AND RESPECTFULLY, I DON'T THINK THAT'S TRUE. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE NO OPTIONS. I THINK I'VE DISCUSSED A LOT OF THINGS WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE, AND I DON'T THINK THAT'S A FAIR STATEMENT TO SAY. I THINK THAT THERE ARE MEETINGS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AMONGST US ALL. THERE ARE PUBLIC RECORDS THAT HAVE OCCURRED TO THE NA. THERE ARE RECORDS BEING REVIEWED. THERE ARE THINGS HAPPENING THAT HAPPEN THAT HAVE BEEN HAPPENING FOR THE LAST 30 DAYS. SO I THINK MOST OF YOU ARE AWARE OF THOSE THINGS. SO I WE ARE I'M MORE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING VERBALLY THAT YOU CAN LIST. THESE ARE THESE ARE THE THESE ARE THE THINGS. THIS IS WHERE YOUR POWER MAY LIE I WE'RE NOT GOING TO DISCUSS THAT IN PUBLIC.

THAT'S WHAT HE SAID. CLEARLY I'M LOOKING FOR TIMING. OKAY. SO. WE WERE ON THE DIRECTION GIVEN. I STAND FIRM BY WHAT VICE MAYOR JUST SAID. WAS THERE SOMEONE ELSE? PARDON? DON'T SIMPLY SAY THAT. I WOULD IMAGINE. MATTHEW, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT THE THE THE PROCESS AND THE PROCEDURES THAT ARE LOBBYIST IS TAKING THEY'RE HAVING DISCUSSIONS. OBVIOUSLY THE LOBBYIST IS OBVIOUSLY HAVING DISCUSSIONS WITH THE LEGISLATORS. AND ULTIMATELY, IF LOBBYIST COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT OUR OUR GOAL, WHICH WAS WHICH WAS DIRECTED TO THE LOBBYIST THAT WE WANT THIS, THIS LEGISLATION TO BE REMOVED, IF THE IF THE LOBBYIST COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THAT'S NOT AN ACHIEVABLE OUTCOME WITH THE LOBBYIST, THEN COME BACK TO US AND SAY HI, THEY'RE NOT WILLING TO REMOVE THIS LEGISLATION.

YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO TO TO EAT IT. HOWEVER THEY'RE WILLING TO MAKE THESE CONCESSIONS. I MEAN, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE EXPECTED OF THE LOBBYIST FROM A STANDPOINT OF COMMUNICATION WITH US, OR IS THAT NOT IS IT JUST GOING TO BE? NOPE. YOU GUYS WANTED IT REMOVED AND IT'S NOT GETTING REMOVED. TOO BAD. YOU KNOW, GOOD LUCK SUING SOMEBODY. SO WHAT YOU JUST DESCRIBED IS THE DEFINITION OF WHAT EVERY LOBBYIST DOES IN TALLAHASSEE.

OKAY. THEN WITH THAT SAID, I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING SOMETHING BACK FROM OUR LOBBYIST ONCE THE PROCESS IS DONE. BUT THE POINT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE IS IT'S A IT'S A LOT BETTER WHEN THOSE CONVERSATIONS OCCUR, WHICH I'M NOT PRIVY TO, MAY COME UP TOMORROW OR TWO WEEKS. AND WITH THAT SAID, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO HAVE SOMETHING THAT HE ALREADY KNOWS IS THE POINT I WAS TRYING TO GET AT. BUT AGAIN, WE HAVEN'T AS A BODY, IT SEEMS THAT WE'RE NOT WILLING TO GIVE THEM GIVE CONCESSIONS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. SO AS A LOBBYIST, PART OF HIS PROCESS WOULD BE TO HAVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS AND BRING THEM BACK TO US. AND WE MAY SAY, NO, WE DON'T ACCEPT THOSE. WE'RE GOING TO SUE EVERYBODY IN THE WORLD. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO HEAR BACK FROM THE LOBBYIST. IS THAT IS THAT AN ACCURATE STATEMENT OR EXPECTATION OR. NO, I THINK THAT'S A FAIR EXPECTATION. OKAY.

THEN I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING BACK FROM THE LOBBYIST AND BE CLEAR. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER BARTON, IT'S ABOUT WHO IS APPOINTED OR ELECTED AND ABOUT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE CANDIDATES. SO IF THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE I'M MISSING THAT WE CAN NEGOTIATE ON, WELL, WHO GETS TO VOTE ON. THAT'S THE QUESTION. CORRECT. AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR FOR THE RECORD, BECAUSE WE'VE WE'VE USED THIS WORD AT LEAST 20 TIMES THROUGH THIS, THIS DISCUSSION. THIS IS NOT A NEGOTIATION. THIS IS NOT ONE PARTY. WE AGREE THAT WE SHOULD MOVE FORWARD. LET'S GO BACK AND FORTH ON CONTRACT LANGUAGE. THIS IS PROVIDING THE PERSON YOU HIRED WITH INFORMATION THAT THEY COULD UTILIZE TO DO THEIR JOB, WITH THEIR NUMBER ONE GOAL

[03:30:03]

BEING TO STOP THIS IN ITS TOTALITY. SO THIS IS NOT LIKE A I THOUGHT THAT THAT IS THE DIRECTION WE GAVE AS A VICE MAYOR SAID. AND I'M GLAD WE HAD THIS CONVERSATION BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER CONVERSATIONS THAT ARE NOT TRUE TO THE WE OBJECT TO THIS INTO ITS ENTIRETY. AND. AND LOOK, GUYS, THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN MAKING LEGISLATION. YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU'RE MAKING LEGISLATION, YOU GO UP THERE AND YOU NEGOTIATE. YOU GIVE AND TAKE SOME THINGS. THIS IS NOT MAKING LEGISLATION. THIS IS ABOUT TAKING AWAY HOME RULE. SO IT'S A DIFFERENT BALLGAME. SO IF I MAY JUST TO RESPOND TO WHAT YOU JUST SAID. THE TEXT THAT WENT TO THREE OF US. THAT'S WILD. IT SAID IT ASKED US IF WE WOULD LIKE BEFORE HE MOVED THE BILL FORWARD. IF THERE'S ANYTHING WE'D LIKE TO WEIGH IN AND PERHAPS AMEND IT, I CAN SPEAK FOR ME WHEN I SAY THE FIRST THING I DID WAS CALL OUR CITY ATTORNEY, SAY, LOOK, WE HAVE PEOPLE WORKING ON THIS, RIGHT? HE SAYS, YEAH. SO MY RESPONSE WAS THAT, DO YOU WANT ME TO READ IT? YEAH, YOU CAN READ IT. IT WENT TO COUNCIL MEMBER KRISEMAN, MYSELF AND COUNCIL MEMBER KRAMER, AND IT WAS FROM ADAM BOTANA AT THE STATE. GOOD MORNING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. I KNOW YOU CANNOT RESPOND TO THIS TEXT MESSAGE, BUT WANTED TO GIVE YOU A HEADS UP. THE AIRPORT BILL IS UP TOMORROW, AND I WANT TO HAVE AN AMENDMENT TO EXPAND THE QUALIFICATION. SO HE'S ALREADY LIMITED. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S WHAT HE IS. NEGOTIATION PLAYGROUND IS IF YOU GUYS WOULD LIKE TO SEND ME IDEAS INDEPENDENTLY, I WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE IT. HOPE Y'ALL HAD A GREAT THANKSGIVING. THAT WAS IT. THEN. SO MY RESPONSE, WHICH I'M ASSUMING MY COLLEAGUES WAS, WAS I TALKED TO OUR ATTORNEY AND WE HAVE A LOBBYIST UP THERE AND WORKING ON THIS, AND I'M NOT SUPPOSED TO GET INVOLVED. AND FOR THE RECORD, MAYOR, SINCE YOU'VE RAISED IT, I MY RESPONSE WAS SIMILAR. I CALLED FIRST MR. MCCONNELL AND MADE SURE HE WAS AWARE OF THIS TEXT. AND SUBSEQUENTLY, BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO NOT RESPOND IN ANY WAY TO REPRESENTATIVE BUNTON, I SENT HIM A TEXT SAYING THAT WE ARE OUR POSITION AS A COUNCIL IS OPPOSITION TO THIS BILL, AND WE AND COMMUNICATIONS ARE THROUGH OUR LOBBYIST IN TALLAHASSEE AND, AND, AND, AND I HAVE NO FURTHER INFORMATION TO PROVIDE TO YOU. AND I DID NOT RESPOND TO IT TO TO THE TEXT MESSAGE. AND I'LL SAY THIS, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WAITING FOR LOBBYIST TO TELL US IF THIS IS A DONE DEAL OR NOT. HE'S TOLD US IT'S A DONE DEAL, BUT OUR REPRESENTATIVES, OUR OUR DELEGATE HAVE SAID THIS IS A DONE DEAL. WE'RE NOT. I DON'T WAIT FOR ANYBODY TO TELL ME THAT. AND THE LAST THING HE SAID, AND I TALKED TO HIM ABOUT ON THE PHONE A COUPLE WEEKS AGO, THE JUST ALL THE FEARS WE'VE SAID AND IT BEING THE COUNTY RUNNING IT AND IT BEING ALL THIS, ALL THESE PACS GET INVOLVED AND ETCETERA. AND HE SAID, YEAH, I HATE ALL THAT, THAT THAT HAS ALL BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED AND IT DOESN'T MATTER. AND SO AGAIN, IT GOES BACK TO ME, WHAT I DON'T I'M ASSUMING WE DON'T HAVE ANY.

THERE'S ALL KINDS OF LAWS I DON'T LIKE. I DON'T LIKE THAT WE CAN'T JUST GO FIX US 41 WHEN IT'S ALL TORE UP. LIKE, WHAT CAN I TELL YOU? BUT MY POINT IS, IF AGAIN, ARE WE GOING TO I DON'T I'M NOT SELLING OUT BECAUSE I'M WILLING. BECAUSE I WANT TO MAKE IT AMENDED AS, AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE RATHER THAN JUST GET THE WHOLE ENCHILADA SHOVED DOWN MY THROAT. THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. DON'T. THAT DOESN'T MEAN I'M OR ANY OF ANY OF US ARE WILLING TO DO THAT.

THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE SELLOUTS. I CAN STILL BE COMPLETELY OPPOSED TO IT, BUT OKAY, TRYING TO MAKE IT PALATABLE. I THINK THIS CONVERSATION HAS MADE IT VERY CLEAR WE STILL ARE. THE ATTORNEY SAID IT. COUNCIL SAID IT. WE OBJECT TO THIS IN ITS ENTIRETY. SO GOING AROUND AND FINDING OUT WHAT IT IS WE CAN NEGOTIATE OR NOT IS A MOOT POINT. SO, MADAM MAYOR, JUST TO TIE THIS UP. SO I BELIEVE MESSAGES ARE BEING SENT FROM THE REPRESENTATIVE TO AT LEAST I DIDN'T RECEIVE IT. I DON'T KNOW WHO ELSE. I HAVEN'T HEARD

[03:35:05]

ANYONE ELSE SAY THAT, BUT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL CLEAR, I WANT TO MAKE AND I, I, I'M CATCHING FROM LOOKING AT. COUNCILWOMAN PETRANOFF HER ACCESS TO THE MESSAGING ON HER PHONE. I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR IN MY QUESTION THAT THE RESPONSES THAT EACH OF YOU HAD TO REPRESENTATIVE BOTANA YOUR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE OR SOMEONE ELSE'S INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE, WAS THAT SHARED WITH ANYONE ELSE ON THIS DAIS? NO. NO, NO. YEAH. MY MY RESPONSE TO REPRESENTATIVE WAS SENT DIRECTLY TO HIM ONLY. GOT IT. THANK YOU. NO, THAT'S WHAT I TOLD HIM. SO. SO NO ONE SAW ANYONE ELSE'S RESPONSE, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. AND FOR THOSE WHO REACHED OUT TO HIM TO STOP THIS PREPOSTEROUS PROPOSAL, THANK YOU. BECAUSE THAT'S I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT DOING, BUT IT'S ON ITS WAY. WE HAVE HIRED LEGAL LOBBYISTS AND GOING TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY AND SAYING THAT WE WOULD BE FLEXIBLE FOR THIS IS ABSOLUTELY NOT OKAY. SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, MR. MCCONNELL, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE? WELL, NO, I DON'T, BUT I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT'S NOT WHAT OCCURRED. THEY DID NOT COME TO ME AND SAY, WHAT WOULD THE CITY BE FLEXIBLE WITH? THIS WAS A DISCUSSION THAT I THOUGHT WAS APPROPRIATE BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT LOBBYISTS DO. I MEAN, WE HIRE MISS HURLEY, WHO GOES THERE AND DOES HER THING AND WE DON'T MICROMANAGE. BUT I WAS WITH AN IMPORTANT TOPIC LIKE THIS. I WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WAS SOMETHING FROM COUNCIL THAT I COULD ARTICULATE TO HELP THEM DO THEIR JOB WHILE STILL PRIORITIZING KILLING THE BILL. YOU DIDN'T ASK ME. I JUST ASKED EVERYONE, OKAY, BUT YOU HADN'T BEFORE TODAY. OKAY? AND I'LL JUST SAY, MAYOR, APROPOS OF A COMMENT YOU MADE A MOMENT AGO, WHAT I HEARD TODAY IS WE ARE WE REMAIN UNITED IN OUR VIEW THAT THAT THIS BILL SHOULD NOT PASS NUMBER ONE. BUT I THINK THERE IS A MIXED VIEW ON THIS COUNCIL AS TO WHETHER OR NOT IF, DEPENDING ON INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE WE GET FROM TALLAHASSEE THROUGH OUR LOBBYIST, THERE WOULD BE OPPORTUNITIES SHOULD THE BILL BE CERTAIN TO PASS TO MODIFY IT, THAT THERE ARE MIXED VIEWS ON THIS COUNCIL ON THAT AT THIS POINT. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT MR. MCCONNELL WILL, YOU KNOW, WILL HAVE TO CONTINUE TO TRY TO EVALUATE BASED ON HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH US AS A GROUP. YES. HE JUST CLARIFIED THAT. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO NO FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM. MR. MCCONNELL. YOU STILL HAD.

NO. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. WELL, OKAY. MR. YOUNG. NO, AND I HAVEN'T THERE'S ACTUALLY THREE ITEMS. NOTHING OF JUST TO SAY I HAVEN'T LOBBIED OR NEGOTIATED EITHER. I JUST MAKE THAT CLEAR.

AS MR. MCCONNELL HAD SAID, CHRISTENSEN UNVEILING OF CHRISTENSEN WAY TO FRIDAY AT 830. JUST WANT TO REMIND COUNCIL THAT IN ADDITION TO THAT, AT 10 A.M. ON FRIDAY IS THE PATROL CAR AND MPD TREE LIGHTING. SO JUST WANT TO REMIND EVERYONE OF THAT. AND THEN ALSO AT 1130 AT BAKER PARK IS THE 2025 HOLIDAY LUNCHEON. SO I JUST WANTED TO REMIND EVERYBODY OF THAT WEARS TO FILL THE CAR THING. YEAH. WHERE WILL THAT BE? OH, THAT'S OVER AT THE NPD AT OKAY, OKAY. AND OTHER THAN THAT AND WHEN YOU WERE SAYING I CAN UPDATE EVERYONE TOMORROW, I FORGOT ALL ABOUT THE CRA MEETING. SO I'LL SEE EVERYBODY TOMORROW. OTHER THAN THAT, I HAVE NOTHING ELSE. I JUST WOULD LIKE TO BECAUSE WE DISCUSSED IT YESTERDAY WITH IN CHARTER ON HOW WE WOULD NOTIFY ANYONE WHO WANTS TO BE UPDATED ON ANY LEGISLATION. TO. WELL, YOU ASKED ME. YOU. WELL, I BELIEVE YOUR STATEMENT WAS THERE WAS A DIRECTIVE GIVEN FOR US TO UPDATE THE WEBSITE TO HAVE IT THERE. AND I SAID, I DON'T RECALL THERE HAVING BEEN SUCH A THING. AND YOU SAID, COULD WE DO THAT? AND WE WERE TOGETHER, I THINK, UNTIL FOUR.

AND THEN I HAD TO PUBLISH THE AGENDA, AND THEN I LEFT AT SIX. AND I HAVEN'T SPOKE TO MONIQUE

[03:40:02]

YET BECAUSE WE WERE BACK IN HERE AT 830. SO WE I WILL LOOK INTO THE WEBSITE AS IT PERTAINS TO ALL LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES, BUT I HAVEN'T EVEN EXPLORED THAT REQUEST. AND IF IT WAS REQUESTED INFORMALLY, A CONSENSUS BY COUNCIL, I JUST NEVER RECALLED IT. SO AND I STILL DIDN'T. AFTER I CONTEMPLATED IT LAST EVENING AS WELL. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT. SO I RECALLED, AND HE'S CORRECTING MY RECOLLECTION THAT WE HAD DISCUSSED THAT IF THERE WAS ANY LEGISLATION THAT THE COMMUNITY WANTED TO ADVOCATE ON, OR THAT WE WANTED TO, AS A COUNCIL, THAT WE WOULD BE NOTIFIED TO BE ABLE TO DO OUR OWN ADVOCACY.

ALSO AS A BODY. SO THE QUESTION WAS, HOW DID ANYONE FIND OUT ABOUT H. THE ENABLING ACT? AND BECAUSE I DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE ON YESTERDAY'S AGENDA, AND SOME PEOPLE SEEM TO KNOW, WE IRONED OUT THE FACT THAT IMMEDIATELY, WHENEVER MANAGER, ATTORNEY, OR NOTIFIED OF ANY THING, THAT WE WOULD BE NOTIFIED, RIGHT. SO THAT WAS A CONFIRMATION. WE AGREED. I'M SORRY, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, WE AGREED THAT EVERYTHING AND THAT WE WOULD MAKE SURE COUNCIL WAS AWARE, RELATED TO THE AIRPORT AND OR OTHER LEGISLATIVE ITEMS. IF WE HEAR FROM OUR LOBBYISTS, WE WOULD MAKE SURE. BUT THE OTHER REQUEST WAS TO IF WE COULD HAVE A LINK ON THERE ON OUR WEBSITE TO IF SOMEBODY'S ANNOUNCING THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE HEARING OF SOME SORT RELATED TO ANY OF THE ITEMS IN OUR LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES, AND THAT'S THE PART I HADN'T LOOKED INTO YET. EXACTLY. AND IF THAT SEEMS, YOU KNOW, WAS WHAT COUNCIL WANTS, THEN YEAH, I, I'M ALREADY LOOKING INTO LIKE I SAID, I, I I'LL HAVE THE CONVERSATION WITH MONIQUE. I JUST DIDN'T I DIDN'T GET TO IT LAST EVENING. OH NO. AND AGAIN IT WAS SOMETHING I THOUGHT HAD BEEN IN DISCUSSION. SO TO BE CONTINUED. BUT OBVIOUSLY WHEN YOU'RE IN ADVOCATING OR LOBBYING, TIME IS OF ESSENCE. SO, YOU KNOW, AGAIN CLARIFYING THAT, YOU KNOW, ANY MEMBER OF, OF THE PUBLIC COULD EASILY SEND SOMETHING TO I MEAN, I'M JUST TALKING ABOUT GENERAL LOBBYING ADVOCACY ON ANY BILL THAT COMES BEFORE THE HOUSE OR THE SENATE THAT THEY CAN SEND A LETTER TO THAT REPRESENTATIVE AND MAKE SURE THAT THEIR REPRESENTATIVE GETS WHATEVER OPINION IT IS. AND I THOUGHT, AND I WAS MISTAKEN, THAT WE HAD HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT. AND BEING ABLE TO PUT ALERTS ON THE WEBSITE SO WE COULD INFORM THE PUBLIC. BUT THAT CONVERSATION CAN BE TO BE CONTINUED. EVEN IN YOUR COMPLETE MR. YOUNG. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. I WENT BACKWARDS. SEE, I THREW YOU OFF. SORRY THEY DIDN'T HAVE COMMENTS AT THIS TIME, RIGHT? YES. YEAH. OKAY. WITH THAT? I'M I'M GOING TO SAY YES. IT IS 1230. AND THANK YOU, MR. YOUNG, BECAUSE I LIKE THE COMMITMENT OF GETTING OUT EARLY AND GETTING THINGS ACCOMPLISHED. WITH THAT, WE ARE ADJOURNED TILL TOMORROW

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.